House Overwehelmingly Passes Amendments Blocking Funding For Undermining Encryption
from the closing-the-backdoor dept
As we've been saying, the passage of the USA Freedom Act is just a small first step in the long road to real surveillance reform. On Wednesday, the House took another small step, voting overwhelmingly in favor of an amendment to an appropriations bill put forth by Rep. Thomas Massie that blocks funding to the National Institute of Science and Technology (NIST) for working with the NSA or CIA to undermine or backdoor encryption. This appears to be quite similar to part of the similar amendment last year that banned both this kind of NIST coordination, but also the NSA's use of backdoor searches under Section 702. As far as I can tell, this new amendment does not include that latter bit. Either way, this amendment passed 383 to 43.It appears that another amendment, put forth by Rep. Ted Poe also passed by voice vote and it would block the use of funds from the DOJ/FBI from being used "to mandate or request that a person alter the product or service of the person to permit electronic surveillance of any user or service" except in cases required under existing wiretapping law.
Both of these are very big deals, and the fact that they passed so easily suggests that the House is nowhere near done on pushing for real surveillance reform. Of course, whether or not these actually go anywhere is another story. As you may recall, after passing overwhelmingly last year, under pressure to get a big omnibus bill done at the end of the year, the House leadership agreed to drop those provisions under pressure from the intelligence community.
Also, one other interesting amendment also appears to have passed easily by voice vote, which is an amendment put forth by Jared Polis, and would make it clear that the DEA cannot do bulk collection under its subpoena authority. As was detailed a few weeks ago, for many years, the DEA had been using this authority to collect tons of phone records, and the program only ended once the administration realized that the claims it was using in support of the NSA's bulk collection didn't apply to the DEA's collection, and thus they couldn't really continue it. Polis's amendment means that this particular loophole is closed for good (not that others might still be open...).
Again, all three of these may not survive all the way into law, but it does show that there's still a very strong interest in the House to continue pushing back against surveillance abuse.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: backdooring encryption, bulk collection, cia, dea, doj, encryption, fbi, jared polis, nist, nsa, subpoenas, ted poe, thomas massie
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Makes Just As Little Sense As Banning Research Into Gun Safety Or Climate Change
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Makes Just As Little Sense As Banning Research Into Gun Safety Or Climate Change
They have shown that they absolutely cannot be trusted with such knowledge and/or tools, so I see nothing wrong with blocking funding aimed at giving it too them.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Makes Just As Little Sense As Banning Research Into Gun Safety Or Climate Change
It's banning undermining encryption: putting backdoors into encryption products and letting people think they're safe. That's the opposite of legitimate security research, and it holds the same moral status as the Takata airbag scandal.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Makes Just As Little Sense As Banning Research Into Gun Safety Or Climate Change
General research is fine, but this was quite specific. Not a good idea.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Makes Just As Little Sense As Banning Research Into Gun Safety Or Climate Change
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Makes Just As Little Sense As Banning Research Into Gun Safety Or Climate Change
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Makes Just As Little Sense As Banning Research Into Gun Safety Or Climate Change
If either of those is happening, I'd be happy to have funds pulled from those programs too.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Makes Just As Little Sense As Banning Research Into Gun Safety Or Climate Change
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
just a little hope
br3n
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
but what I really want to see (as if there were any chance)...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Contradictions and hedging:
"this particular loophole is closed for good (not that others might still be open...)."
Headline BLARES: "Overwehelmingly [sic] Passes" then at end that's YANKED AWAY: "all three of these may not survive all the way into law"
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Contradictions and hedging:
"this particular loophole is closed for good (not that others might still be open...)."
Headline BLARES: "Overwehelmingly [sic] Passes" then at end that's YANKED AWAY: "all three of these may not survive all the way into law"
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Contradictions and hedging:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
If this trend continues . . .
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: If this trend continues . . .
[ link to this | view in chronology ]