And, Of Course, UK Law Enforcement ALSO Using Cell Tower Spoofers, Refusing To Talk About Them
from the our-shared-surveillance-culture dept
No one seriously believed it was just US law enforcement agencies using repurposed war gear to track cellphone users, did they?
An investigation by the British news channel Sky News claims to have found evidence of fake cellphone towers operating in London and elsewhere that acts similarly to devices known as IMSI catchers, the most famous of which is manufactured under the brand name StingRay.The results of Sky News' GDMK Cryptophone-enabled cell tower wardriving can be found in this file, which supposedly uncovered more than 20 cell tower imposters in London alone in a three-week period. We've still got the UK beat on nomenclature, though. IMSI catchers are pretty much always referred to as "stingrays" (actually a product name trademarked by manufacturer Harris Corporation). Due to the lack of official acknowledgement or FOA-ed documents, we're stuck with the clunky "ICT hardware," as produced by manufacturer Datong.*
*Time to crowdsource a better British nickname. We honestly can't be using "ICT hardware" in the future when further details inevitably leak out. You'd think the Brits would already have this handled, considering the split development of the language (American/English) has necessitated a need for an English-to-English dictionary at this point.
Here's what officials don't have to say about the Sky News revelations, which follows on the heels of previous investigations by The Guardian and the Times of London. The only thing on record -- outside of the inevitable refusal to confirm or deny -- is this statement, which implies the public's right to know what law enforcement is up to falls far, far behind law enforcement's need to bust bad guys.
“We’re not going to talk about it,” Met official Bernard Hogan-Howe told Sky News when asked for comment. “The only people who benefit [from a comment] are the other side, and I see no reason in giving away that sort of thing."Of course. And then there's this "reassurance," which only states that whatever the police are doing with these devices, it's certainly not as bad as the worst case scenarios envisioned by the most overactively-imaginative.
“If people imagine that we’ve got the resources to do as much intrusion as they worry about, I would reassure them that’s impossible,” Hogan-Howe added without providing any evidence to support his claim.But that's OK, because what we do know about IMSI catchers should be scary enough. They force phones to the "dumbest" connection -- 2G -- to better facilitate the interception of calls and texts. They indiscriminately hoover up all call data in the area and can often disrupt normal phone service. Their exisitence is routinely hidden from courts, judges and criminal defendants. And they've been deployed thousands of times by hundreds of law enforcement agencies without a warrant.
These are all reason the public should be made aware of the purchase and use of these devices. But because usage isn't as "intrusive" as Hogan-Howe fails to specify it could be, British citizens are apparently supposed to believe everything is perfectly fine.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: cell tower spoofing, gag orders, imsi catcher, law enforcement, stingray, surveillance, uk
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
A few that come to mind
Big Brother's Little Helper
Grab-It-All
Security Saboteur
Judicial Bypass Device(JBD)*
Voyeur's Delight/Best Friend
*Probably my personal favorite, given how often those using them seem to 'forget' to mention it to the courts when it comes time to ask for permission to spy on someone and/or present evidence.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: A few that come to mind
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: A few that come to mind
How DEC got ahold of the name Vax (VAX/VMS), I have no idea.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: A few that come to mind
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: A few that come to mind
Was that the tag they used? If so, perhaps they got sued into nonexistence by Electrolux, who used to have the wonderful tagline "Nothing sucks like an Electrolux".
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: A few that come to mind
Obviously before our time. Who'd want to buy one sold like that nowadays?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: A few that come to mind
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
"The other side" means the public, I guess.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Yes, we who've yet to be charged with having committed a crime. We simply must be patient while they work on that small detail.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
ICTH
If it is warrant-less (judicially) that would be WITCH. Are these devices attached to broomsticks?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
The other side
The "other side" in this case being the general public!
He needs an attitude transplant.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: The other side
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: The other side
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: The other side
No, he believes the general public are on his side, and he's correct. Since nobody wants to tell the public what they're really doing, how would they know to object?
Tyranny through obscurity?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Name
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
As for the Sky News document, I find it telling there are such phrases as "Suspicious events weight", "Processor Suspicion level" "Event is untracked, suspicion: NONE" and so forth. The UK police have moved from being the lovable "Bobby on the Beat" to a bunch of keyboard-mashing, curtain-twitching goons. Enid Blyton was right all along.
There's an image of a Stingray on Tim's first link to The Blot, based I think on this:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-33076527
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
If it was just criminals why does the government go to such efforts to hide what they are doing?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Doubleplusgood.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]