When Facebook Decides To Silently Delete Journalism
from the down-the-memory-hole dept
There's been an awful lot of discussion about the role of Facebook on journalism these days. I'm actually a lot less concerned than many who have been complaining that Facebook's growing importance is somehow "dangerous" for the future of news. The simple fact is that a huge percentage of people (especially young people) currently get their news via Facebook. But, at the very least, we should be concerned when Facebook starts to play the role of the arbitrary editor, simply deleting stories it doesn't like.Jim MacMillan, a photojournalist who is currently the Assistant Director for the Center for Public Interest Journalism at Temple University happened upon a somewhat tragic scene last month, of a 68-year-old woman struck and killed by one of those "Duck Boats" (the rickety half bus/half boat things that are -- for reasons I still don't get -- popular with tourists). The story made headlines in part because of claims that the woman was too focused on her mobile device to notice that she was walking in the road against the traffic light.
MacMillan just happened to be there, and while he notes that he's been out of the "breaking news" photojournalism business for years, he recognized an opportunity and snapped a few photographs and posted them to Instagram, Facebook, and Twitter:
Police hang a tarp after a person was caught under #RideTheDucks boat at 11th and Arch just now. Looks very serious: pic.twitter.com/FOvgs3PuMY
— Jim MacMillan (@JimMacMillan) May 8, 2015
I posted the photo to my Instagram account and clicked the button to share to Facebook. But while discussing the incident with a colleague last night, I scrolled back and discovered that both posts had been deleted.MacMillan notes that he was careful to post a photo that did not show the actual body, but rather the police putting up the tarp:
In the most recent incident, I saw the victim’s body between the right, rear wheels and it was clear that she was dead, but I posted a more sensitive picture of police on the other side of the vehicle and captioned it only to say: “Police hang a tarp after a person was caught under #RideTheDucks boat at 11th and Arch just now. Looks very serious.”As MacMillan notes, it's particularly ridiculous that Facebook didn't even inform him of this or give him any chance to respond or protest the silent deletion of his journalistic work:
We do things like this to eliminate the possibility that loved ones will learn of the death from anyone but official sources and to spare viewers the traumatic effects of graphic imagery whenever possible. In other words, I was operating conservatively within standard practices of photojournalism.
That was my best effort to be sensitive to the victim while responsible to the public's right to know that there had been another fatal accident involving a Ride the Ducks boat.
But why would Facebook take down this image? Who might have complained? And shouldn’t I have been offered the opportunity to respond?In an update, MacMillan notes that people from Facebook are claiming they have no record of a takedown at all -- leading MacMillan to wonder
While I'm less worried than many others about Facebook's impact on journalism, it does seem like the company really ought to very, very clear and transparenty how it handles taking down content. Many other sites make sure that they, at the very least, inform users of any takedowns and even provide clear processes for challenging the decision. Here, assuming MacMillan is correct, the content was just removed. If the content really was just removed, it should call into question the credibility of journalism found on Facebook.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: deleting, editors, jim macmillan, journalism, takedowns
Companies: facebook
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Time for a new social media site
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Time for a new social media site
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
FUD
Nothing nefarious. Many apps nowadays practice “optimistic updates” where they show the expected result of an action before it has been committed to the server. The effect is a much more responsive app, but it can also mask persistence errors if not handled properly. Did he actually look to see if it had gone to Facebook?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: FUD
That was my first thought as well. Is there anyone who actually saw it on Facebook to confirm that it was in fact deleted.
Is Instagram owned by Facebook? If the post is missing from both and they're not controlled by the same people, I'm more inclined to believe that something else happened.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: FUD
Yes. Same company.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
That's really funny. Does anyone not question the credibility of journalism found on Facebook?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
It may be true that a huge percentage of people currently get their news via Facebook, but that does not give Facebook journalism any credibility to call into question now that they deleted a random post from a random photojournalist. That's not the issue here. If you give Facebook a power comparable to mainstream media, you will get from Facebook the same you get from mainstream media. What else would you expect?
Stallman has been saying "see what could happen if you rely on someone else's platform, avoid it" for a long time, but he is just an extremist...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Correction:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Correction:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Correction:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Correction:
Clarified. I meant that you wondered if it ever got posted, but didn't mean to imply that you thought you hadn't tried to post it.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Correction:
The subject of a post had an issue with part of the story and mentioned it publicly. The author acknowledged the issue, made a clarification/correction, and stated as much. Publicly, right here in front of everyone. That's transparency.
TD may be 'just' an opinion/analysis blog, but it does journalism a hell of a lot better than The Sunday Times.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Correction:
Or transparenty.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Correction:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
When does a post post?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Are they lazy or simply do not know better?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Is this the new definition of an oxymoron?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Facebook is broken a lot
I went on one of those in London, England. The river level was really high and quite choppy.
I enjoyed it.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Simple solution: Don't Use Facebook
It's a private company for pete's sake, however permissive they may be at one time or another they have no legal obligation to allow arbitrary speech.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Other Deletions
A few years back I was photographing a murder scene and had posted a photo of the body covered by a tarp.
Someone had reported the photo so it was subsequently taken down, and my account was suspended for 3days basically saying that my content was inappropriate and that I was blocked.
Facebook is very finicky about news.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Obat Dalam Untuk luka Operasi Caesar
[ link to this | view in chronology ]