This Week In Techdirt History: June 21st - 27th

from the decent! dept

Five Years Ago

These were the early days of the Chelsea (then Bradley) Manning affair, but apart from that, this week in 2010 was mostly like the last: jam-packed with activity on the copyright front. BPI was sending takedowns to Google in what appeared to be part of a broader plan, while the IFPI was trying to get the search giant to stop linking to The Pirate Bay entirely. German newspaper publishers were seeking copyright on headlines, while up in Canada the Heritage Minister called those who oppose stricter copyright law radical extremists (and then denied it, only to find out it was caught on video). The major labels were busy astroturfing in favor of three-strikes while trying to avoid paying songwriters, and ASCAP was demonizing Creative Commons.

We got one very bad ruling this week in 2010, when an appeals court said it's okay to take stuff out of the public domain and put it back under copyright. We also got a very good one when the court ruled in favor of YouTube in the Viacom lawsuit. Of course, that battle was far from over, but for the time being Viacom was in denial about the result while we wondered what its true implications were. The White House released its strategic plan for intellectual property and it wasn't as bad as we expected, but were disappointed to learn that the administration had pivoted from supporting copyright exceptions for the blind to fighting against them. Meanwhile, lots of researchers and other people were trying to tell the true story: how weaker copyright benefits culture and society, how the lack of fair use coverage for satire stifles free speech, how the recording industry made file-sharing much worse for itself, how there's no evidence that kicking people offline for file-sharing is in any way necessary, and how things like the Digital Economy Act and ACTA will stifle creativity.

Ten Years Ago

Much that was happening in 2005 this week mirrors what was happening in 2010. Canada was grappling with an earlier round of copyright reform, America's Copyright Czar was proposing major changes that were potentially good and potentially bad, and lines were being clearly drawn between the camps for sharing and owning culture. The recording industry was trying out a too-little-too-late plan to compete with unauthorized file-sharing, but it was the MPAA that was really up to no good: it tried to sneak broadcast flag legislation into the law, and then made some grandiose claims about its anti-piracy successes (then, when called on the numbers, tried to explain them away as hypothetical future piracy). Even the FTC was starting to see through Hollywood's anti-file-sharing claims (and so were the kids), while we revisited the ways the fashion industry thrives without copyright.

Also this week in 2005, the EU was moving forwards on software patents despite the fact that the politicians voting for it didn't understand the difference between patents and copyright. We got one great example of the ridiculousness of such patents too, when Apple was sued over the iTunes interface.

Fifteen Years Ago

In 2000, the file-sharing debate was just as heated but far more streamlined, with almost everything focused on the still-prominent Napster, which had just hired the government's lead attorney in the Microsoft case. One independent band, meanwhile, launched StopNapster.com — though on the other hand, the Economist was rightly pointing out that Napster is a wake-up call and proof that online distribution is feasible. Some companies were trying more "creative" offerings, like gas pumps that let you download music while you fill up, and the world drew closer and closer to the iPod with the advent of the first 1GB portable media player hard drive.

NASA announced that it had, for some reason, perfected porn-blocking software. It hadn't, and neither had anybody else who tried. The Librarian of Congress displayed his cluelessness about the internet, while Microsoft was airing a bizarre media campaign starring Bill Gates. The EU was setting up to probe the AOL/Time Warner merger, Sony was getting ready to storm the mobile phone market, and Kmart was making yet another attempt at getting online.

Forty & Eighteen Years Ago

This week, we look at two interesting milestones in the history of free speech in the US, and more specifically one of its most complex and storied wrinkles: obscenity and indecency. First, it was on June 26th, 1975 that the Supreme Court handed down its ruling in Miller v. California, establishing the three-prong "Miller Test" for obscene (and thus unprotected) speech. It requires that all three conditions be satisfied:

  • Whether "the average person, applying contemporary community standards", would find that the work, taken as a whole, appeals to the prurient interest,
  • Whether the work depicts or describes, in a patently offensive way, sexual conduct or excretory functions specifically defined by applicable state law,
  • Whether the work, taken as a whole, lacks serious literary, artistic, political, or scientific value.

Two decades later, a related law hit the scene: the Communications Decency Act. When it gets brought up here at Techdirt, it's mostly with regards to the Section 230 safe harbors, which have had an impact far beyond the subject of "decency". But the Act's original primary purpose was to protect children from seeing bad stuff online, and much of this has been struck down or altered since, with one notable date being June 26th, 1997 — the same day as the establishment of the Miller Test, 22 years later — when the Supreme Court upheld the ruling in Reno v. American Civil Liberties Union that the indecency provisions of the CDA were unconstitutional violations of the First Amendment.

Hide this

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team

Filed Under: history, look back


Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread


  • This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it
    identicon
    Langue-en-joue, 27 Jun 2015 @ 12:37pm

    Man, reading any those old stories shows how the forum is dying.

    I see these main reasons:

    The stories now don't even stink, theyr'e just there. Uber, cable co's, and russian propaganda jsut ain't cuttin' it. How can "techs" not be all over Apple and Google news instead of some one damn page the Russian's blocking?

    The forum is toxic. Not the trolls, its everyone jumping on them, worse tyring to run them off, that actually runs off new people. I'd say quit hiding their posts, every time people find a hdden post kinda makes sense, it's worse. I'll make up my own mind, thanks guys, you don't need to protect me.

    Pirates are on the ropes. Every court case, it's like taking "intellectual property" isn't legal.

    link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      Pragmatic, 1 Jul 2015 @ 5:11am

      Re: Man, reading any those old stories shows how the forum is dying.

      Copyright, etc., is not property, it's a temporary monopoly privilege. Its primary purpose is to advance science and the arts by giving the author, etc., the sole right to profit from the work "for a little while."

      That its purpose has been perverted to fence off the commons into walled gardens owned and controlled by corporate gatekeepers is due to the determined greed of powerful interest groups.

      link to this | view in chronology ]

  • This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it
    identicon
    Langue-en-joue, 27 Jun 2015 @ 12:39pm

    Man, reading any those old stories shows how the forum is dying.

    I see these main reasons::

    The stories now don't even stink, theyr'e just there. Uber, cable co's, and russian propaganda jsut ain't cuttin' it. How can "techs" not be all over Apple and Google news instead of some one damn page the Russian's blocking?

    The forum is toxic. Not the trolls, its everyone jumping on them, worse tyring to run them off, that actually runs off new people. I'd say quit hiding their posts, every time people find a hdden post kinda makes sense, it's worse. I'll make up my own mind, thanks guys, you don't need to protect me.

    Pirates are on the ropes. Every court case, it's like taking "intellectual property" isn't legal.

    link to this | view in chronology ]

    • icon
      Nigel Lew (profile), 27 Jun 2015 @ 4:01pm

      Re: Man, reading any those old stories shows how the forum is dying.

      Feel free to try again with facts and English. You have failed entirely on both counts.

      link to this | view in chronology ]

      • identicon
        Anonymous Coward, 28 Jun 2015 @ 8:39am

        Re: Re: Man, reading any those old stories shows how the forum is dying.

        He's an IP supporter and most IP supporters are largely illiterate. It shows. Look at the MPAA and their members (ie: Disney).

        I'm not even sure what he's trying to say to be honest, it's too incoherent for me to even respond to. I'm partly assuming he's an IP supporter based on the incoherent nature of his post.

        link to this | view in chronology ]

        • identicon
          Anonymous Coward, 28 Jun 2015 @ 8:48am

          Re: Re: Re: Man, reading any those old stories shows how the forum is dying.

          It's like the shills are devolving again. Once upon a time the shills used to come here and ramble a bunch of incoherent nonsense that was so confusing no one could even understand it yet alone respond. They used to randomly intersperse capital letters with lowercase, double and single space things randomly sometimes in the middle of a sentence, their paragraph structures were nonexistent, words were so badly misspelled that it was often difficult to even recognize them. I remember those days. Eventually they learned how to form coherent sentences and they were able to form something more understandable but it was mostly based on nonsense logic and made up facts with no proof. Now they're devolving back again into incoherent nonsense that's not even understandable. Perhaps they figure if their posts are mysterious enough they might fool someone into thinking they have a valid point somewhere, at least that was the theory back in the days. It never did work though.

          link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      Anonymous Coward, 27 Jun 2015 @ 5:38pm

      Re:

      So if there's nothing wrong with "the stories now" why do you even bother complaining?

      link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Klaus, 28 Jun 2015 @ 4:22am

    People like "Langue-en-joue"

    I've never understood why people like you do that; you find a website in an area that interests you, that has a forum where people can share information and express themselves, but instead of contributing to the forum you denigrate it.

    It must really suck to be you, all hollowed-out, with nothing worthwhile to do, but all the time having to bear that negativity...

    link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 28 Jun 2015 @ 9:16am

    I always wondered what kind of shit he had to go through as a captured Terrorist in the US. What little we know from mkul'e, drugs were certainly involved.

    link to this | view in chronology ]


Follow Techdirt
Essential Reading
Techdirt Deals
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Discord

The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...

Loading...
Recent Stories

This site, like most other sites on the web, uses cookies. For more information, see our privacy policy. Got it
Close

Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.