Aadhaar: Soon, In India, Everyone Will Be A Number
from the national-identity-card-club dept
National identification numbers are common enough -- many countries issue their citizens with a unique identifier. But in terms of scale, few can match Aadhaar, India's identity number system. As The Times of India explained a few years back, when the scheme was first announced:
Aadhaar is a 12-digit unique number which will be issued by the Unique Identification Authority of India (UIDAI) to all residents of the country. It's a step towards putting India in the club of more than 50 countries around the world that have some form of national identity cards. These include most of continental Europe (not the UK), China, Brazil, Japan, Iran, Israel and Indonesia. The number will be stored in a centralized database and linked to the basic demographics and biometric information photograph, ten fingerprints and iris of each individual. The number will be unique and would be available for online and offline verification and, hence, will rule out the possibility of duplicate and fake identities from government as well as various private databases.
The Aadhaar system is designed to make it easier for people on the sub-continent to prove their identity:
One of the key challenges faced by people in India is difficulty in establishing identity. People have multiple identity documents, each serving a different purpose. The most important characteristic of Aadhaar is its universality and it is assumed that the biometric card with the number will be gradually accepted across the country as the identification number by all service providers and government agencies.
The system is almost in place. According to an article in The Economic Times, as of this month, 870 million Aadhaar numbers have been issued. The hope is to achieve "universal coverage" -- 1.2 billion people -- by December.
Initially, the Indian government insisted that the scheme was voluntary, although even in 2013, there were concerns that it was effectively mandatory because various state benefits required its use. In 2014, India's Supreme Court reiterated that the system should not be compulsory, and also forbade the authorities from sharing biometric data held on the associated database with the police or similar agencies without the permission of the person concerned.
That raises one of the principal concerns with such centralized databases: the fact that, once created, there is a natural tendency to use them for purposes that have nothing to do with the original justification. For example, in 2013, there were suggestions that the Aadhaar card could be linked to driving licenses. In December last year, 100 million bank accounts were already associated with Aadhaar numbers. Last month, it was revealed that the Indian Railways may make the use of the Aadhaar number mandatory for booking online tickets. All of those will make tracking a person's activities much easier.
As the use of the Aadhaar system spreads to more domains, and becomes indispensable for more everyday services, that single number will assume an ever-greater importance in the lives of people in India -- and therefore become increasingly useful for identity fraud. It will doubtless make things much easier for the public there; but it will also provide the authorities with the perfect way of unifying all the information that they hold about citizens. Let's hope that by the time that happens, India has in place suitably robust laws regulating both government surveillance and data protection.
Follow me @glynmoody on Twitter or identi.ca, and +glynmoody on Google+
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: aadhaar, id, id number, national id, number, privacy
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Coupling ssn with 10 finger prints and iris data is slightly worrying since these data seems more like a police gesture than a personal useful feature.
Protection against abuse can be mostly assured by photo or a single finger print in situ and by use of one-time codes on paper in vitro.
What is really problematic in most countries with ssn is the continual concentration of data in single points of failure. It is solvable by grouping and separating the data on different machines with different logins. Having it all in a single database as we see today is reckless.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Will the real Glyn Moody please stand up
So many identities. It would be so much easier if you just gave us your Aadhaar
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
By the application of strict logic, all that can be proven by such a database is that the data in the database matches the person using the ID number. If it security is broken, then someone can overwrite someone else's details in the database to steal their identity. Also, anybody with access to the database could cause trouble for other people by modifying the their stored details. So this database will be a reliable means of identification if and only if the security and data entry and protection are perfect.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
As a side note: the SSN wasn't supposed to be used for anything other than Social Security as well, but, as is always the case, the number slowly crept into our daily lives and has become our national identifier.
You can't even get a job without one. Well, legally, anyway.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
And that hasn't be abused at all!!
> You can't even get a job without one. Well, legally, anyway.
Of all the actual problems with SSN usage you picked the one thing that is not an issue. Social Security is funded by your paycheck. Of course they need an SSN (but not necessarily your SSN if you don't care about social security). If you want to complain about Kafkaesque requirements for a job, go read up on E-Verify.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Sounds like it will be a major CF
You can't get a drivers license in the US without a SSN. Technically, you are suppose to be able to, but good luck with that. They make it almost impossible.
Obama Care requires that your health insurance have and report you via your SSN.
You can't open a bank account with a SSN.
You can't get many utility services without a SSN.
Your credit history is keyed on your SSN.
SSN's are stolen, faked, and abused all over the place. The fact that they are the keys to interfacing with government services is almost criminal.
Has any country managed to implement a national ID number system that hasn't gone sideways?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Sounds like it will be a major CF
According to Glyn's piece, that's what they biometrics are supposed to help with. In the American SSN system, there's no way to tell if the holder is dead or alive, let alone matches an iris scan and ten fingerprints.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Sounds like it will be a major CF
Welcome, Warden Smithers!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Permission
Of course, permission is easy to coerce.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
If it's established, it _WILL_ be abused.
Only for Social Security... they told us.
And Only for Tax Information... they told us.
And Only for Gov. Benefits.... they told us.
[and they really mean it] They make it illegal for the government to require it, without it being _specifically_authorized_by_law. But only for the Federal government.
Industry starts using it to tie every database together, state government starts requiring it. You have to use it when applying for a drivers license, and many states will go so far as to use them as your drivers number and print them on the license itself {Massachusetts did (does?) this and it's a metric ton of paperwork and hassle to get then NOT to use/print it on your license.}.
Finally the government just starts mandating them everywhere.
In a bit of surrealist comedy, the government spends lots of time/money warning people to:
At least we don't have to carry around a government issued ID, yet. [Though that might not be a bad idea, if you are in any way Hispanic looking and happen to live in Maricopa County, Arizona.]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
To paraphrase the Moody Blues
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
I guess that puts some amputees and people with congenital defects out of the scheme then.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
I don't know what a bruhaha is all about..
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: I don't know what a bruhaha is all about..
Has there ever been any fear that the Government might utilize this database for nefarious purposes among the Thai public?
Is there any sort of public awareness of what the Thailand Government does from day to day or does all the public information come fully prepared for public consumption by the government or its media partners?
Isn't Thailand the place where I would go if I were a pedophile with cash - seems I heard something about 8-10 year old hookers being a major Thailand tourist attraction.
Was this just rumor?
---
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Sounds more like a for-runner of the Internet ID card...
hohohohohohohohoho hahahahahahahaha hehehehehehehehe
Damn that was the best laugh I've had in days.
Thanks. I needed that.
Sarcasm at its very best! :)
---
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
One bad apple, upset the whole cart..
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: One bad apple, upset the whole cart..
Methinks ye need to change yer anti-stress drugs, or get a new keyboard - one or the other...
---
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]