Time Warner Cable Forced To Pay $229,500 For Robocalling The Wrong Person...153 Times

from the dysfunction-junction dept

Wed, Jul 8th 2015 10:33am — Karl Bode

Time Warner Cable continues to be incredibly good at being incredibly bad at what it does. The cable operator already enjoys arguably the worst customer satisfaction ratings of any company in any U.S. industry, below even Comcast. Its horrible customer service is legendary, and things have actually gotten worse as the company has sat on its hands waiting to be sold off to a rotating crop of equally dysfunctional suitors. When you're this bad at what you do, you have to be truly creative in finding new and imaginative ways to annoy your customer base.

Time Warner Cable's latest incredible display of ineptitude? The cable giant has been sued for robocalling a woman 153 times regarding an overdue balance. The problem? Time Warner Cable was calling the wrong woman, who ultimately had to file suit against the cable operator to get them to stop annoying her:

"King, of Irving, Texas, accused Time Warner Cable of harassing her by leaving messages for Luiz Perez, who once held her cellphone number, even after she made clear who she was in a seven-minute discussion with a company representative. The calls were made through an "interactive voice response" system meant for customers who were late paying bills."

Time Warner Cable is being ordered by the courts to pay Araceli King $229,500 (or $1,500 per call) for violating the Telephone Consumer Protection Act, not a bad payout for the woman having to delete 153 unlistened-to voicemails. The truly amazing part is that Time Warner Cable still managed to robocall the woman an additional 74 times...after the suit was filed:

"He also said 74 of the calls had been placed after King sued in March 2014, and that it was "incredible" to believe Time Warner Cable when it said it still did not know she objected. "Defendant harassed plaintiff with robo-calls until she had to resort to a lawsuit to make the calls stop, and even then TWC could not be bothered to update the information in its IVR system," Hellerstein wrote."

That's pretty impressive even for Time Warner Cable's low standards of operational efficiency. Some bad news for Time Warner Cable: the FCC actually just got done making Robocall restrictions a little tougher for violators. Surely Time Warner Cable CEO Rob Marcus, set to potentially make $97 million as an exit package via the upcoming Charter merger, is working tirelessly at making his company much less professionally annoying.

Gov Uscourts Nysd 424841 33 0 (PDF)Gov Uscourts Nysd 424841 33 0 (Text)

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team

Filed Under: do not call, robocalls, telemarketing, telephone consumer protection act
Companies: time warner cable

21 Comments

If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...

Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread

Baron von Robber, 8 Jul 2015 @ 10:35am

" $97 million as an exit package via the upcoming Charter merger,"

I wish I could get laid off for that kind of money.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Anonymous Coward, 8 Jul 2015 @ 1:19pm
  
  Re:
  For $97 million you must be one good piece of, oh layed OFF...nevermind.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
JustShutUpAndObey, 8 Jul 2015 @ 10:47am

ALMOST unbelievable
I would refuse to believe such a level of ineptitude would be possible from any corporation. Except, this is a cable company we're talking about, so it sounds like business as usual.

Ms. King is my hero for today.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- John Fenderson (profile), 8 Jul 2015 @ 11:42am
  
  Re: ALMOST unbelievable
  I find it pretty easy to believe. Major corporations tend to be inept at anything other than increasing short-term profits.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
sophisticatedjanedoe (profile), 8 Jul 2015 @ 11:00am

This is funny: I wrote about this judge just yesterday...

(On Monday Judge Alvin K. Hellerstein issued a fantastic order scolding copyright troll Malibu Media / XArt.)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 8 Jul 2015 @ 11:05am

Re: About damn time...
Now how about just outlawing it. If one is too lazy to dial a phone number with their finger maybe they shouldn't be calling in the first place.
Not a good idea. I work on a system that robocalls parents and students. It is strictly informational but is a huge help to parents and students. It generally only calls to inform parents of their student's skipping classes, late start, early release, snow days and any special events. Occasionally someone will call in and say that they don't have a student and I go in and remove the number. What surprising is it takes me only about 2 minutes to trace and remove a number. That is an expensive 2 minute fix for Time Warner.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- John Fenderson (profile), 8 Jul 2015 @ 11:40am
  
  Re: Re: About damn time...
  I assume that the system is opt-in, not opt-out. I don't have a problem with offering a robocall service that you have to actively sign up for. All others should die a fiery death.
  
  Especially debt collectors. I got my current phone # a few years back. The person who had it before me skipped out on a lot of debt. To this day I get a couple of calls on a daily basis from debt collectors looking for that person. I've never been able to get this problem fixed.
  
  I loathe robocalls.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - R.H. (profile), 8 Jul 2015 @ 3:36pm
    
    Re: Re: Re: About damn time...
    In the district where I went to school the robocall system was opt-in, kind of. Every year you had to have your parents fill out and sign an emergency form with an address, phone number, and emergency contact information. That form noted that the primary contact (parent/guardian) information could be used for automatic calls but, if a student didn't turn in the form they'd be suspended until they did. So, the system was effectively opt-in or home school your kid.
    
    I don't know if it's changed since my youngest sibling graduated high school but, somehow I doubt it.
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
    - John Fenderson (profile), 9 Jul 2015 @ 7:42am
      
      Re: Re: Re: Re: About damn time...
      That's not opt-in at all, then. It's mandatory.
      [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - John Scott Rugg, 13 Mar 2016 @ 3:56am
    
    Re: Re: Re: About damn time...
    HI John:
    
    Ther might be one smigin of hope yet. I have this exact same problem. I've only know of one possible solution I thought I might share w/you. I work as a consumer advocate. When I got these calls, I would call back the collection agency from my cell phone explaining that the number has since been recycled. I give them my name and the one their trying to reach and I direct them to my website where they'll be able to see THAT number with my name. Then I ask the to call THAT number while I remain on my cell phone. As they're able to confirm that it is, in fact, the same person, they'll finally take me off their list. My website doesn't discuss this yet only because I've been unable to axis (modify) ever it since Yahoo became a piece of sh_t and offers no more Customer Service. I'm dumping them real soon. I can elaborate more on that later. If you don't have axis to this method, please email me and we'll figure something out for you. Honestly, I will!!!
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
- John85851 (profile), 9 Jul 2015 @ 4:43pm
  
  Re: Re: About damn time...
  Yes, but you have to admit that there's a huge difference between robocalling parents from the school that their child goes to and randomly calling people about "fixing their credit" or trying to collect a debt from someone who's long gone.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 8 Jul 2015 @ 12:16pm

Let's hope that the Judge overseeing the RightsCorp and it's rightsholders case that involves robocalling comes to the same conclusion and rules against Rightscorp and its rightsholders for the abuse of robocalls made to innocent people with threats etc.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Paul Renault (profile), 8 Jul 2015 @ 12:55pm

Almost, almost...coulda been poetic justice.
If only it had been the RIAA that had called ms King. Then we could have heard them denounce the fairness of statutory damages...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Paul Renault (profile), 9 Jul 2015 @ 4:27am
  
  Re: Almost, almost...coulda been poetic justice.
  oops: that should have been "..denounce the UNfairness of statutory damages..."
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 8 Jul 2015 @ 3:45pm

Taking bets AFTER the judgement they continued to call her.
I know people who've been called by TWC with sexual harassment, death threats and other nastyness simply because call centre staff are bored and have zero management looking over their shoulders.....
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
badrasputin (profile), 8 Jul 2015 @ 4:42pm

robo call prevention
Had enough of robo calls, so I enrolled with Nomorobo to intercept robo calls and trash them. Have not had a robo call in 2 days. Peace at last. Service is free if your isp has voip. I used ATT U-Verse. So far it's working great.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 8 Jul 2015 @ 7:46pm

I've been robocalled 27 times in the last 32 days by Capital One, even after they acknowledged that I'm not the person that they're looking for. I ended up filing a complaint with the Consumer Financial Protection Commission. Capital One acknowledged the complaint, and even had an "executive" contact me and promise to stop. They've since robocalled me every day but one (they gave me July 4th off), for a total of 16 times since promising to stop.

Anybody have a phone number for plantiff's lawyer?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Anonymous Coward, 8 Jul 2015 @ 7:48pm
  
  Re:
  Answered it myself
  
  http://www.lemberglaw.com/
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 8 Jul 2015 @ 8:43pm

They must have been calling this poor woman at least two times a day, every day, for months on end.

*ring ring ring*

"Hello, Miss King. We couldn't seem to reach you during normal business hours, so we've added a 2am robo call to the mix. We assume you work 3rd shift seeing as we couldn't reach you."
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 8 Jul 2015 @ 10:15pm

Up the Ante
"...Time Warner Cable still managed to robocall the woman an additional 74 times..."

Hope Hizzoner will add the product 74x$1,500 to the existing award.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
David, 9 Jul 2015 @ 3:39am

That should teach them
For that kind of money they could be paying 100 support staff members for a year. At current prices, this makes easily for 300 tons of bananas or I don't know how many peanuts.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]