Reminder: When Ron Wyden Says There's A Secret Interpretation Of A Law, Everyone Should Pay Attention
from the how-many-times-do-we-need-to-do-this dept
Years before Ed Snowden revealed how the NSA and DOJ had reinterpreted the PATRIOT Act and the FISA Amendments Act to allow the intelligence community to spy on Americans, Senator Ron Wyden tried to warn the public that this had happened:We're getting to a gap between what the public thinks the law says and what the American government secretly thinks the law says.For a couple of years after he said that, privacy and civil liberties advocates were forced into something of a guessing game to figure out what that secret law actually said. Eventually, the details were spilled by Ed Snowden who is, of course, now being threatened with a lifetime in prison for blowing the whistle.
This is not the only time that Wyden has made these kinds of warnings, and he's doing it again right now -- this time over CISA, the faux-"cybersecurity" bill that Wyden has made clear is really about surveillance. Recently released papers from the Snowden archives have made it clear why he's saying this, because it showed that, contrary to what's been said in the past, the NSA is using "cyber signatures" to sniff through upstream collections (their taps into the fiber backbone) under Section 702 of the FISA Amendments Act. And this opens up the information collected to so-called "back door" or "incidental" searches by the NSA. The whole point of CISA is to actually encourage companies to give the government more such "cyber signatures" which they can use to monitor the internet.
However, there's likely more going on as well, and in particular, Senator Wyden has been strongly hinting about an important Justice Department memo that remains classified, but which he implies would change the debate.
Wyden... claims that a classified Justice Department legal opinion written during the early years of the George W. Bush administration is pertinent to the upper chamber's consideration of cyberlegislation—a warning that reminds close observers of his allusions to the National Security Agency's surveillance powers years before they were exposed publicly by Edward Snowden.Last year, based on some breadcrumbs that Wyden dropped during the confirmation hearings for Caroline Krass as the CIA's new top lawyer, Marcey Wheeler dug into some more details about this document, and notes that it comes from the same period of time when the Bush administration was twisting itself into knots to justify warrantless wiretapping and torture. In other words, this document seems ridiculously relevant to the debate.
[....] "I remain very concerned that a secret Justice Department opinion that is of clear relevance to this debate continues to be withheld from the public," Wyden said in his written dissent against CISA, which cleared the Senate Intelligence Committee 14-1 in March. "This opinion, which interprets common commercial service agreements, is inconsistent with the public's understanding of the law, and I believe it will be difficult for Congress to have a fully informed debate on cybersecurity legislation if it does not understand how these agreements have been interpreted by the Executive Branch."
And while it appears that the vote on CISA has likely been delayed yet again, it seems like this is a fairly important detail.
In short, haven't we, as a country, learned enough to note that, when Senator Wyden points out that there's a secret interpretation of the law that is at odds with a plain reading of it, we should all be demanding answers?
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: cisa, cybersecurity, doj, information sharing, ron wyden, secret law, surveillance
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
But this is the intended design
This is why the law is complex and useless to a civilized nation. The moment you decide that a lawyer has value in the course of a Nation Justice system is the moment you have admitted, by way of the front door, its own demise and corruption.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
WILL YOU PLEASE RUN FOR PRESIDENT?
Sincerely,
The American People
PS: Kiss our ass, Dianne.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Senator Wyden could redeem himself from selling out on Fast Track by reading this cyber memo into the Senate record. The reading over 'the public needs to know more about X' is getting stale.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Out with it, Man.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Speech_or_Debate_Clause
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Demand more than answers
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Demand more than answers
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
The Scorpion and the Frog
Credit: http://allaboutfrogs.org/stories/scorpion.html
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
There's another lesson to be learned here, folks.
Secret interpretations didn't stop with Bush and they're not stopping with Obama, and wuthout some immediate reform to halt this crap immediately, it pretty much turns the United States into a polished totalitarian turd.
Maybe with some glitter.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
So they aren't searching through our data
Stay Classy America
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
What the law actually says...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: What the law actually says...
Of course, right now, with prosecutory discretion and ridiculous levels of criminalization we just have a system where if someone important doesn't like you, you go to prison. For a long time.
Makes me think of the Espionage act and how the law (somehow) dictates that the defense cannot justify the act, or even discuss it with the jury. We have laws like that?
So yeah, when we talk about whistleblowers having their day in court or facing the consequences, it's not the same day in court one gets when (say) charged with murder.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Relevant and Ridiculous
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Simple. So far, they've been allowed to.
In theory, there are checks and balances which force their illegalities out into the open so they can be stopped and possibly punished. Those checks and balances have been allowed to atrophy and are no longer performing their original desired function. Both Congress and the courts are choosing to collude with the administration, having decided that they're no longer beholden to citizen voters. They're beholden to something else; a not so hidden agenda.
That hidden agenda is so much in force that even a US senator is afraid to publicly call them on it. That should scare the hell out of everyone and anger them enough to fix this obvious brokenness, but so far that's not happened. We don't know whether we'll see that happen in our lifetimes, but if we care to see it happen someday, we just have to keep pushing back hoping they'll come to their senses before they find themselves hanging from meathooks in the town square.
I wonder what is the point of even having elected lawmakers writing laws when the administration can decide for itself what those laws actually say and mean and we're not allowed to know what those laws actually say and mean. You'd be better off simply demolishing the Capitol Building and saving the money. You may as well suspend elections too, and there'll be no need for an FEC either.
All those politicians about to spend trillions on a presidential election next year can instead just go find a sunny beach and drown themselves in pina coladas instead of wasting everyone's time and money seeming to govern.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Once the subject is disarmed they are SUPPOSED to be released. If they leave a system armed and never intend to disarm it while innocent civillians are trapped being tortured they may strip themselves of all geneva protections for the rest of their existences as it would do nothing but torture the innocent if said system was misdeployed.
The USSR deployed it more than anyone else and there's a reason reagan called it the evil empire
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Let's be clear
FTFY.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Let's be clear
From what I've read, Snowden's just happy that the only ones who're making this all about him are the LEOs/"Authoritays." He's happy that pretty much everyone else is focusing on the crap he blew the whistle on, which was always his intention. I think it's really cool how he's all over the world via Internet video, including a standing ovation at an IETF hackathon. Rock on, Ed! :-)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]