DC Mayor Reverses Course On Body Cam Footage, Opens Up Recordings To Citizens And Researchers
from the putting-the-'public'-back-in-public-records dept
Back in April of this year, Washington DC mayor Muriel Bowser sided with the city's law enforcement against transparency and accountability. The mayor promised to outfit officers with body cams in the wake of several, high-profile police-involved shootings. But two weeks after this promise in her State of the District speech, Bowser tucked a provision into a budget bill that would exempt the footage from public records requests.
Supposedly, this was done in the interests of "privacy," but the blanket exception just meant local law enforcement would never feel compelled to hand over less-than-flattering footage. Bad news, to be sure, but only a few months later and Mayor Bowser has completely reversed course.
Police in the nation’s capital would release more footage from body cameras than in any other major U.S. city under a plan from Mayor Muriel E. Bowser that reverses her previous opposition to making such videos public.There will still be some exemptions. Anything recorded in a private residence would be limited to court proceedings and footage of traffic stops resulting in no arrests or citations will be heavily redacted to prevent the inadvertent release of personal information.
Bowser’s proposal, which has the potential to shed light on thousands of recorded interactions between police and the public, would allow private citizens to obtain copies of video recorded on street corners, during traffic stops and elsewhere outdoors.
The reason for Bowser's change of heart? Police officers just kept right on killing people.
In a statement to The Post, Bowser cited continued police shootings over the past year as a reason for the change, saying the tide has tilted in favor of greater disclosure even as governments must strike a balance between privacy and transparency.The balance has been tipped back in favor of the public, thanks to the actions of law enforcement. In addition to making most camera footage responsive to public records requests, DC citizens will also be allowed to view footage of incidents they're involved in by heading to their local police station within 90 days of the event. Access to all footage will be granted to researchers studying the effects of body-worn cameras.
DC cops who thought their videotaped misconduct would be stashed away from the prying eyes of the public aren't going to be thrilled with this reversal. And they have no one to blame but their colleagues.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: body cams, dc, muriel bowser, privacy, washington dc
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Stop shooting people.
But why does it have to be couched in riddles? Why are all of our lawmakers incapable of just saying it outright? It's easy: "Stop shooting people."
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Stop shooting people.
Oh, come on. They're only shooting minorities. You know, blacks, chicanos, the homeless, and maybe Native Americans. It's a bit disingenuous to stretch that out by saying they're shooting "people", as if they're shooting just anyone. Get a grip. Bleeding heart liberals. Gah!
[Do need to mention this is sarcasm?]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Stop shooting people.
You? No. Anonymous Coward? Yes. :)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Stop shooting people.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
I'm betting on the standard sleazy tactic of claiming that their objections to the cameras, and the recordings from them being public, are based entirely upon concern for the public's privacy.
The police of course would be overjoyed by the cameras, but they're just so very concerned for the public's privacy you see. /s
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Good cops would welcome the cameras
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Good cops would welcome the cameras
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Good cops would welcome the cameras
I'm afraid only Roy Rogers had that skill.
Some people will criticize the police no matter what they do. There was a PCP junkie here that murdered his girlfriend, robbed a WalMart pharmacy firing his gun in the crowded store and barricaded himself in his apartment. He shot at the police numerous times. They had reason to believe he had large quantities of ammunition and bomb making materials. The standoff went on for 36 hours and our police chief was criticized for finally saying "Let's take him out". Even after hitting the apartment with a fire hose he shot at the SWAT team as they moved in. The way some people complained you would think they shot Mother Teressa!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Good cops would welcome the cameras
As we are all equal under the law, they did shoot Mother Teressa. They shot me, and they shot you.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Good cops would welcome the cameras
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Good cops would welcome the cameras
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Good cops would welcome the cameras
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Good cops would welcome the cameras
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Good cops would welcome the cameras
Equal under the law.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Good cops would welcome the cameras
Then they should've just filled the place with tear gas and pepper spray. You can't aim steadily when you're coughing your lungs out and can't see for tears filling your eyes.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Good cops would welcome the cameras
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Good cops would welcome the cameras
Luckily you weren't in charge of tactics either.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Good cops would welcome the cameras
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Good cops would welcome the cameras
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Good cops would welcome the cameras
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Good cops would welcome the cameras
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Good cops would welcome the cameras
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Good cops would welcome the cameras
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
*raises eyebrow* Is anyone else thinking of Super Mario right now?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Maybe this is the real reason for the turnaround
(Original quote snitched from the linked Washington City Paper article.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Short Term Good WIll be Subverted
But, give them a few years to work it out and the powers that be will start applying Big Data techniques to the all of the footage all of their officers collect in order to turn the tables and assert their dominance once again.
I hope that before it gets to that point we'll have implemented serious data protection that prevents anybody from getting access to footage without a full blown warrant. Specifically no automated processing of the footage by anyone, it gets encrypted and time-stamped at the camera, goes into the cloud for permanent storage and the decryption keys stay with the court - only to be handed out after judicial review, with an expedited and inexpensive path for normal citizens to request footage that applies to themselves.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
No privacy problem if citizens do their own recording
The privacy problems come only when the police have the only record, which has to be made widely available to check repeated police dishonesty.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
The Russian populace has it right
[ link to this | view in chronology ]