Turing Pharma Caves; Says Drug Price Will Move In Generally Downward Motion At Some Point In The Future
from the and-will-only-do-so-because-the-public-doesn't-understand-business dept
Martin Shkreli -- who became the personification of a deeply-reviled industry thanks to his insanely-exorbitant price hike on a 60-year old drug -- has heard the disapproving roar of the crowd and will do… something… at some point in the future… to make things right. Or at least a bit more right-ish.
In an interview with ABC, Shkreli announced Daraprim's $750/pill price will be rolled back to something less extortionate.
“We’ve agreed to lower the price on Daraprim to a point that is more affordable and is able to allow the company to make a profit, but a very small profit,” he told ABC News. “We think these changes will be welcomed.”With nothing else to go on (other than Shkreli's continued assertions that the drug is still underpriced), the public will just have to assume that the new price point, whenever it arrives, will be barely above cost. (Considering it was produced for a $1/pill before Turing's purchase, one would think a significant reduction in price would still leave plenty of room for profits and additional R&D.)
Turing's mini-debacle has damaged the pharmaceutical industry. It has drawn even more heat from legislators and presidential candidates. It has even negatively affected more tangible aspects, like stock prices. Shkreli's actions have also drawn attention to the oft-ignored regulatory procedures that allow companies to fully exploit old drugs and medications, even without the protective power of active patents. Derek Lowe at Science Magazine explains the route to securing post-patent monopolies.
By various means, old generic compounds have ended up as protected species, and several companies have made it their business to take advantage of these situations to the maximum extent possible. The FDA grants market exclusivity to companies that are willing to take “grandfathered” compounds into compliance with their current regulatory framework, and that’s led to some ridiculous situations with drugs like colchicine and progesterone. (Perhaps the worst example is a company that’s using this technique to get ahold of a drug that’s currently being provided at no charge whatsoever).Combine this with the bottleneck Turing generously refers to as "distribution" (via a single specialty pharmacy or directly from Turing itself) and you have everything you need to demand any amount you want for a lifesaving drug with a limited market. Everything being said about R&D investment is just smoke until proven otherwise.
Following his short statements promising unquantified price drops at an unspecified point in the future, Martin Shkreli -- who seemed to relish praising himself/insulting his detractors from this social media platform -- took his Twitter ball and went home.
Turns out the market will bear far less than Turing thought, even with the benefits of a tightly-controlled distribution chain and the FDA's assistance in keeping competitors off the playing field. A whole lot of people who will never use the drug managed to nudge the price downward, and all within 48 hours.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: daraprim, drug prices, drugs, martin shkreli, monopoly, pharmaceuticals, pricing
Companies: turing, turing pharmaceutical
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
$749 and 100 cents.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
It's not like they have monthly Health & Safety reviews / FDA checkups.
Also I'm pretty sure if their situation is so precarious
they can't afford to pay out dividends so no yachts here.
Maybe Mr. Shkreli spends the money on gear for his LoL Team... LOL IDK !?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
http://www.luerssen-yachts.com/
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Good times
Everyone grows older, but it's clear not everyone grows up.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Good times
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Good times
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Good times
He tweeted three weeks ago to sell stock in that arena, and then,,,well, we can see clearly what ahppened next.
I'm pretty sure that's criminal activity.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Lies
Mysterious voice across the universe: "The Universe will end in 3," "Price of Daraprim is 1 cent now" ",1..."
Sorry but all I'm hearing is "Pay or die!" But a thumbs up for capitalism. The guy understands it.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Lies
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Lies
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Lies
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Lies
Blaming them for acting like money-grubbing dirtbags is like blaming the scorpion when it stings. To them it's not a matter of right or wrong, it's about performing a natural function.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Lies
Yet this is exactly what we have today with excessive IP and other laws that attempt to give those willing to buy regulators, through back door dealings, exclusivity. We have a very very corrupt FDA. If it were up to them just about all dietary supplements would be banned by now or greatly monopolized thanks to the FDA. Even herbs. But the dietary supplement health and education act limited the FDA's ability to regulate dietary supplements and added a grandfathered date that all herbs and dietary supplements before that date can't be banned by the FDA. Even then the FDA has managed to regulate naturally occurring supplements like red yeast rice in ways that limit their medicinal effectiveness by limiting the amount of naturally occurring effective ingredients that they contain to trace amounts. Despite the fact that these alternatives have been shown to be safe unregulated (and have been around for hundreds of years), especially relative to pharmaceuticals. and why do they do this? So they can push prices of pharmaceuticals up by restricting competition. The FDA is a corrupt corrupt organization that has absolutely no right to take away my health freedoms. They have no right!!!! It's none of their business. If I want to try an unadulterated herb, with whatever naturally occurring ingredients it has, for whatever health problem I may have the FDA needs to mind its own business instead of telling me that they don't want to give me the opportunity to try and see if it works for me. It's my decision. Their medical authority be darned because they don't have my best interest in mind, only their own. and if I want to sell that herb on a free market they should also get out of the way so long as the contents of whatever it is that's being sold matches the label so that the buyer knows what they are buying. Otherwise when the FDA tries to limit the number of sellers of something they are effectively making something more expensive for me as a buyer and they really have no business doing that.
but this entire country has turned into nothing but a protectionist country. From excessive IP to taxi-cab medallion laws to cableco monopolies to even attempts by the FDA to limit the generic market very little about this country is capitalistic anymore. It's all exactly what Adam Smith warned against.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Lies
I don't think so. But I suspect that when you say "capitalism" what you're really meaning is the "free market".
Capitalism and free market economics are two different things.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Lies
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Lies
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Lies
http://capitalismmagazine.com/2014/12/altruism-means-self-sacrifice-not-benevolence/
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Besides, I've been seeing it in food prices: throw the price through the roof, let outrage ensue, scale prices back to slightly more than normal. People rejoice prices are back down but don't realize it is significantly higher than before the massive hike.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
The same thing happens to gas prices:
Starting price: $2.00 a gallon.
Then prices go to up to $2.50 because of "reasons".
People complain.
Then the gas companies "bow to public pressure" and reduce the price to $2.25.
People rejoice because they "won" because they got the big gas company to lower the price.
Yet the price is still higher than it was before this started. Sure, it's not as high, but the company is still making more money.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
You a commie or something? wth!
/s
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Justice system
Yup criminal charges
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Response to: Anonymous Coward on Sep 23rd, 2015 @ 7:00am
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Sociopaths have bills to pay too, you know.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Welcome to the world run by corporations for the benefit of corporations; where laws and regulations are used to protect the incumbents.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Price it out of the market
And even then, how long will it take for a competitor to make their own drug- 2 or 3 years or longer? In the meantime, the guy enjoys the monopoly the previous company created by selling the drug for such a low price.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
And to quote the 23rd rule of Acquisition: "Nothing is more important than your health... except for your money."
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
i dont blame the guy for trying to make money, but not like this. i also think that the fucking plums that continuously make laws that basically just screw ordinary people to the wall should be brought to account! they sure as hell wouldn't be so keen to do this sort of thing if it affected them!!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]