TVEyes Hit With Incredibly Restrictive Permanent Injunction By Court
from the so-much-for-the-fair-use-'win' dept
The last time we checked in with the long-running TVEyes case, the TV monitoring company had scored another partial victory for fair use. The company packages clips of news stories from TV broadcasts and makes them available to paying subscribers -- which include journalists and government officials.
It had scored a much larger fair use win earlier, when the court found that even the storage of clips by TVEyes fell under fair use, despite Fox News' protests to the contrary. A year later, some of TVEyes' fair use victory was scaled back. The court took another look at the end users' ability to download and store clips and found these actions weren't covered under the fair use ruling. Users could privately share clips and create archives only they could access. What wasn't covered was public sharing and downloading of clips.
In order to comply with the court's decision, TVEyes would need to additionally restrict access to its compiled content. The court didn't say specifically what TVEyes would have to change to comply with the ruling at that point. Those instructions appear to have arrived.
An injunction issued by the court contains all sorts of new restrictions, as Eriq Gardner reports.
Here's a list of things that are now forbidden:These new restrictions could do some serious damage to TVEyes, which charges subscribers ~$500/month for access to a wide variety of news clips. Where high-profile subscribers like Reuters, Bloomberg, the White House (yes, THAT one), the Dept. of Defense and others will go if they find the new restrictions unworkable isn't exactly clear, but it's a safe bet that Fox's litigious efforts will see a few of these entities finding the service no longer worth the investment.
Enabling users to download to their own computers video clips of content telecast on the Fox News Channel or Fox Business Network.
Enabling users to view FNC or FBN content by searching by date, time, and channel.
Enabling users from sharing video clips of FNC or FBN content on social media websites rather than by personally directed emails, with further limitations.
Those further limitations?
If a TVEyes client wants to email a clip, he or she can only do so to five or less recipients. The client also has to register their work email with TVEyes instead of using Gmail or another free web email service. Those being sent the clip will also have to submit their own email address to ensure they are the intended recipients.
And that's not the full extent of the restrictions in the permanent injunction. TVEyes will also be required to create and implement a social media blockade solely for Fox News content to prevent the public sharing of its clips. Any Fox content circulated by TVEyes will also have to carry a warning that the content has not been purchased or licensed by the company and that unauthorized sharing is considered copyright infringement. So, for $500/month, TVEyes' subscribers will now have the privilege of being blasted with anti-piracy warnings as if they were lowly, DVD-purchasing peasants.
This order can be appealed and most certainly will be, as it imposes a ton of restrictions on content originating from a single source. Fox News gets its own new set of rules and everyone else plays by the old ones. The court's decisions haven't exactly added up to a fair use win, because a real fair use ruling would apply across the board, not just to everything but this one particular litigant's content.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: archiving, copyright, downloading, fair use, search, tv, tv news
Companies: fox, tveyes
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
All or nothing
If it's not fair use with regards to content created by anyone else, then it's not fair use with regards to content created by Fox.
The court can't give Fox special treatment, either TVEyes' conduct is considered fair use for all content, including Fox's, or it's not fair use, and that includes the content from Fox.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Making Rupert Proud
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Fox "News" is an oxymoron
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Fox News has a reasonable argument against TVEyes
Further, it would allow critics to compare past Fox News statements with:
* current Fox News statements
* newly revealed facts
* existing facts at the time of Fox News statements
* common sense
Fair Use was never intended to allow someone to criticize Fox News.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
A first time for everything
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Fox News has a reasonable argument against TVEyes
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: All or nothing
This is the USA where money, not logic, buys judgements!
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Huh?
Mind you, the only time I see Fox News is when I watch "The Daily Show". Yes, we have Fox News in Australia, but I've never gone there, not even channel surfing, as all the news channels are grouped together, so I don't actually go on any of them.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Fox News has a reasonable argument against TVEyes
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Fox News has a reasonable argument against TVEyes
But I like it to start out sounding like it is serious and then devolve into clearly, beyond any possible doubt, being /sarc.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re: Fox News has a reasonable argument against TVEyes
[ link to this | view in thread ]