FBI To Replace Terrible Voluntary Police Shooting Reporting System With NEW Voluntary Police Shooting Reporting System
from the unrecognizable-'changes'-ahead! dept
Back in October, the FBI very belatedly admitted it had been doing an abysmal job tracking the number of people killed by law enforcement officers. For nearly 15 years, the DOJ has been charged with collecting this data, but so far has only managed to produce totals that are half of those compiled by citizens and journalists.
The FBI admitted it hadn't done a very good job collecting this data and vowed to improve things in the future. But it didn't say how it would accomplish this. It didn't appear to be considering changing the one factor contributing the most to its yearly under-count: the system is entirely voluntary. As a result, less than 3% of the nation's 18,000 law enforcement agencies have regularly reported their shootings to the FBI.
More details have emerged on the FBI's new use-of-force tracking initiative. The former program -- which none other than FBI director James Comey called a "travesty" -- is being overhauled. The voluntary reporting system will be replaced with a revamped, more detailed… completely voluntary reporting system.
The new database will continue to rely on the voluntary reports of local police departments; FBI officials said they lack the legal authority to mandate reporting.Cynics/critics will be
But [FBI Assistant Director of Criminal Justice Information] Stephen Morris said the leaders of the nation’s largest police organizations have agreed for the first time to lobby local departments to produce the data. The Justice Department is also looking to offer federal grants to local departments that may need additional resources to comply.Well, peer pressure definitely has improved the nation's law enforcement agencies by ridding them of "bad apples" and internal corruption… oh, wait, none of that ever happened. Financial incentives may work better than peer pressure. A nation full of asset forfeiture abuse can attest to that. But if the money can only be spent on complying with a voluntary effort that might make agencies/individual officers "look bad," it's unlikely this "carrot" will work better than the stick the FBI can't wield.
“We will be relying on peer pressure and financial incentives,” Morris said.
The FBI may not be able to make this reporting mandatory, but Congress can. So far, legislative efforts aimed at doing exactly that haven't gone anywhere. But despite FBI officials publicly wringing their hands over the results of the agency's multiple years of indifference, the agency has yet to offer any public support for this sort of legislation.
If this effort ever approaches large-scale participation, the stats gathered will be much more in-depth than anything the DOJ's collected to date.
The new effort will go beyond tracking fatal shootings and, for the first time, track any incident in which an officer causes serious injury or death to civilians, including through the use of stun guns, pepper spray and even fists and feet.What will likely produce more and better results sooner is this effort -- which is already in progress.
[...]
Morris said the data will also be “much more granular” than in the past and will probably include the gender and race of officers and suspects involved in these encounters, the level of threat or danger the officer faced, and the types of weapons wielded by either party.
Change is also underway at the Bureau of Justice Statistics, another Justice Department agency that has kept a separate count of civilians who die in police custody.The government doesn't always need to bootstrap its data gathering. The private sector tends to produce solid results. Plus,it's motivated -- at least in this case -- to collect as much data as possible and make it publicly-available. Law enforcement agencies are generally motivated to do the opposite, unless otherwise instructed. And it generally takes more than a "Would you kindly?" from the federal government to generate changes in mindset.
The bureau scrapped its old database and this year created a pilot program that relies on The [Washington] Post’s database and other open-source data-collection efforts to identify deaths that are not being reported. Then, BJS officials contacted police, medical examiners and other local officials to check the accuracy of the information and to gather additional facts.
Anything would be better than what the FBI has delivered for the past several years. But it will take more than the FBI's public dismay to overcome law enforcement's natural instinct to bury anything that remotely resembles a questionable use of force.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: database, fbi, police shooting, records, tracking, voluntary
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
What next, mandatory reporting for bathroom breaks?
I mean, can you imagine being able to choose whether or not you want to report that you committed a crime, with absolutely no penalty if you decide not to? That would be completely ridiculous and a massive conflict of interest, leading to drastic under-reporting and 'forgetting' to mention countless things when it came time to record what happened.
Thankfully however sanity prevails, as while making it mandatory to report crimes or potential crimes committed while on duty is only reasonable, the same mandatory reporting for minor non-criminal acts would be excessive and uncalled for, and since murder and assault aren't crimes, it makes perfect sense to make reporting them purely optional.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: What next, mandatory reporting for bathroom breaks?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: What next, mandatory reporting for bathroom breaks?
Where I work you have to get permission to go to the bathroom (which you may or may not receive when you need it). Then they time and record how many seconds it takes you. Then they put it up on charts for all to see and compare employees.
Or you can just dirty yourself. (Which is what they would really prefer. You should see the stains on some of the chairs there).
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
What you don't seem to understand are the implications if the police had to report every shooting under their watch. Going by your regular attempts to bash any form of authority, it stands to reason that any report would simply be fodder for the trolls here to undermine law enforcement. You already paint a heavily biased picture with your mobile phones shoved in the faces of policemen. Why should it be up to you to tell the police what they can and cannot do in public? But obviously, you would rather ignore the criminal acts because the alternative would inconvenience you slightly. Breaking the law is still breaking the law.
Does it suck that the police have to shoot people? Maybe, but since you entitled losers can't seem to stop being criminal, someone has to make you accountable for your actions. And since I know PaulT is going to bait me again, I choose to leave this comment unsigned in, so I can make him look like a fool when he responds.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
I'm not sure whether to report this or give it a funny vote.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
You mean implications like "they might actually have an incentive to reduce the number of shootings", or "people could have a more fully formed discussion of how serious a problem we're looking at"?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
My guess is, he's going to either run away like the pathetic little shit he is instead of explaining himself, or he's going to log back in and claim it wasn't him. Predictable scummy bastard.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Versus your regular attempts to denigrate any reports of abuse of authority, I'd say TD's credibility far outstrips yours. Compare the FBI's reporting system results to the Guardian's reporting system results, and anyone will conclude the former is a fatally flawed and worthless tool except for those with something to hide. You don't care that mass murder is happening on a grand scale and the perpetrators are evading punishment and even recognition by policy.
Quisling, you should be ashamed of yourself. "My country, right or wrong" was good enough for unquestioning, ignorant, flag-waving hardhats, but not for anyone who swears allegiance to the Constitution, as every officer of the law does upon taking the job.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re:
I thought they were. Whether they've even read it or know what's in it is a valid question. Maybe the PBAs have managed to bargain that requirement away, or Congress (or the courts) passed a LEO exception. It wouldn't surprise me nowadays.
Glad I don't live there, and sadly I'll never set foot there again. You have my sympathies, now go and fix it, damnit! Your firemen have become arsonists (Fahrenheit 451).
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
Hook, line and sinker.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
I have to catalog every change I make on a production server... poor little POlice having to do all that paperwork sucks man cut em a break right?
"Why should it be up to you to tell the police what they can and cannot do in public?"
Um... because WE pay their salaries to PROTECT US.
"Does it suck that the police have to shoot people?"
Did you eat a whole bag of batshit and go 300% crazy?
"Maybe, but since you entitled losers can't seem to stop being criminal, someone has to make you accountable for your actions."
Yes, yes you did.
"And since I know PaulT is going to bait me again, I choose to leave this comment unsigned in, so I can make him look like a fool when he responds."
You... are sooo... SMRT there little Whatever fellah.
"I love how every time the police make an honest attempt to improve"
ROFL!!!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Because Encryption!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
What are the odds? /s
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
you know what cops need...
Police work dangerous, almost thankless, jobs. They get burned out. All of that up and down adrenalin. Cops should have mandatory term limits after 10 years in service. After 10 years, they should be forced to take 1 yr. off. After that 1yr break (covered by their pension or whatever) they should be re-evaluated and allowed to resume service as police officers--if they wish.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: you know what cops need...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: you know what cops need...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: you know what cops need...
I just arbitrarily threw 10 yrs out there--it could be whatever number the local citizenry agrees upon.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: you know what cops need...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
They may not be able to mandate reporting, but they should be able to commit to investigating every shooting that isn't reported. That might give people a bit more incentive.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
The law already requires shootings in general to be reported. And I don't believe there is an exception for "shot by cop". And these reports are forwarded to the FBI. So, the FBI is already getting reports, even if not from the police themselves, and practicing willful blindness by ignoring them.
Cops ignoring possible wrongdoing by other cops. Imagine that.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
The cops themselves are independent, under no obligation to the federal government unless they've entered into a (nearly useless) "consent decree" due to abusive practices. The only other way PDs would have to report would be if it were made a requirement for using a federal resource, like the 1033 program.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
Are you suggesting that local police are selectively and actively withholding reports of shootings by cops while letting the others trough?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
"Embarrassment"?
What Comey and the FBI's response appears to really mean: It is embarrassing that 3% of law enforcement agencies regularly leak shooting data that put our officers in a bad light. Obviously we need to add more paperwork to the voluntary process.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: "Embarrassment"?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
typcial government...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Close, but more like "doesn't care and can't be bothered to let you know how many people it kills." After all, if they weren't doing anything wrong, they wouldn't have needed a bullet, now would they? Sheesh, civilians!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Mandatory Reporting. . .
How many people you killed doesn't further that goal, so hence it is not mandatory.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]