Facebook Busted Trying To Fake Support For Its Net Neutrality Positions In India

from the we-see-what-you-did-there dept

Fri, Jan 15th 2016 12:43pm — Karl Bode

For much of the last year now, Facebook has been under fire in India for its "Free Basics" zero rating campaign, which exempts Facebook-approved content from carrier usage caps, purportedly to the benefit of the nation's poor. Critics however have argued that Facebook's just trying to corner developing ad markets under the banner of altruism, and giving one company so much control over what's effectively a walled garden sets a horrible precedent for a truly open Internet. Indian regulator TRAI has agreed so far, arguing that what Facebook is doing is effectively glorified collusion, and it's demanding that Facebook shut the program down until a public conversation about net neutrality can be had.

Like any good giant international company, Facebook's response to this call for open and honest dialogue has been to launch a mammoth media and lobbying blitz across India. The campaign has included buying entire newspaper spreads in which Mark Zuckerberg professes to be super worried about the country's farmers, to some subtle, local advertising:

But as we noted a few weeks ago, Facebook also engaged in some pretty shifty behavior to try and trick people into spamming Indian regulators in favor of Facebook's Free Basics plan. Numerous people complained that the Facebook app tricked them into signing and sending a complaint to TRAI, after the regulator issued a call for public feedback on the country's nascent net neutrality rules:

Got conned into signing the #FreeBasics petition on FB. DON'T "SCROLL DOWN TO LEARN MORE"! Signs you up immediately! pic.twitter.com/XqpyQSdUlN
— Accidenteshwari (@accidenteshwari) December 18, 2015

Facebook subsequently admitted it also "accidentally" sent the message to U.S and UK users as well, resulting in a flood of "feedback" from people who don't live in India and may not even know what Free Basics is. Amusingly, TRAI appears to have noticed the spam attempt and called Facebook's bluff. In a public notice (pdf), TRAI notes that it received 2.4 million responses in total, with about 1.9 million of them associated with Facebook's media campaign domains.

Being Facebook-generated form letters, TRAI points out that none of these responses appear to answer any of the questions the regulators put forth in its original call for feedback. Facebook's response, attached to the filing, is to claim that the company actually helped generate 11 million supporters of Free Basics, yet it mysteriously has no idea where these missing 9.1 million responses disappeared to. In other words, Facebook not only tried to trick its users into spamming the government, but it appears it may have lied about the overall volume of support Free Basics had.

Combined with Zuckerberg's claims that opponents of Free Basics are extremists that hate the poor, Facebook's making an excellent case for its critics who say that creating a walled garden version of the Internet in which Facebook is king is a very bad idea. A better idea? As numerous folks have suggested, how about putting all of this money being spent on Free basics, lobbying, spamming and marketing into actually updating India's lagging broadband infrastructure?

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team

Filed Under: free basics, india, net neutrality, trai, zero rating
Companies: facebook

25 Comments

If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...

Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread

Anonymous Coward, 15 Jan 2016 @ 1:13pm

I always find it interesting when companies buy huge swaths of advertising for what are supposed to be altruistic purposes. You spend money to make money, not the other way around.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Anonymous Coward, 15 Jan 2016 @ 3:22pm
  
  Re:
  Building your altruism on what you choose they deserve, is not altruism! It is self-fulfillment, a policy, a business!
  
  That is the biggest problem here: In pursuit of saving his business venture, he is invoking altruism as a reason to support his purpose.
  
  It is very unethical and irresponsible to appeal to peoples emotions like that, but if you can pull the wool on enough people, you might just win the political battle...
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - Anonymous Coward, 15 Jan 2016 @ 6:34pm
    
    Re: Re:
    It worked on Mike Masnick.
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
    - Anonymous Coward, 15 Jan 2016 @ 7:17pm
      
      Re: Re: Re:
      Can't decide if this is just ambiguous, or a complete non sequitur.
      [ link to this | view in chronology ]
      - Anonymous Coward, 15 Jan 2016 @ 7:51pm
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re:
        https://www.techdirt.com/blog/innovation/articles/20151221/14525533151/how-private-sector-innovation -can-help-those-most-need.shtml?threaded=true&sp=1#comments
        [ link to this | view in chronology ]
        
        orbitalinsertion (profile), 15 Jan 2016 @ 11:21pm
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
        That had nothing to do with advertising, and although i agree that some of these are problematic or somewhat misrepresented, changing the behavior of private industry for the better is one of the best ways to improve things. Hell, if the way we do consumption and economies does not change, nothing ever will improve.
        
        But more to the point: That wasn't Mike Masnick.
        [ link to this | view in chronology ]
        
        Anonymous Coward, 17 Jan 2016 @ 3:09pm
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
        That wasn't Mike Masnick, in the comments, putting Facebook and Zuckerberg on a pedestal?
        [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 15 Jan 2016 @ 1:15pm

I would trust free basics from Richmond Valentine more than Mark Zuckerberg.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 15 Jan 2016 @ 1:21pm

Facebook is a spy machine
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 15 Jan 2016 @ 1:29pm

DINK
Mark Zuckerberg Is a dink.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Anonymous Coward, 15 Jan 2016 @ 4:33pm
  
  Re: DINK
  Double Income, No Kids? Really? Will be a surprise to both Priscilla and Maxima.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Mason Wheeler (profile), 15 Jan 2016 @ 1:32pm

Google: Don't be evil.

Facebook: Don't even bother pretending we're not evil.

Sometimes it really does feel that simple.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 15 Jan 2016 @ 1:32pm

Good to see anything with the word free in it should be regard with suspicion and scrutiny.

Facebook is in decline and Free Basics is dangerously suspect. You're not a visionary zuckerberg.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 15 Jan 2016 @ 1:52pm

But, but , but ...
I thought Zuckerberg was the world's greatest philanthropist!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 15 Jan 2016 @ 2:23pm

Time to cook ...
Time to cook an Internet-over-Facebook app. Add a few spoonfulls of VPN for privacy and a snuff of ad-blocker for sanity.

Serve it along the Free Basics main course and let the people savour the taste of freedom, entirely free!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Anonymous Coward, 16 Jan 2016 @ 3:54am
  
  Re: Time to cook ...
  Wouldn't work. Free basics has a whitelist of allowed websites at the server-end, so you can't bypass restrictions using VPNs.
  (purely co-incidence that every single allowed IP address belongs to people with the exact same political beliefs as Zuckerberg, of course)....
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 15 Jan 2016 @ 2:36pm

Facebook spamming is really no surprise
Spammer Mark Zuckerberg founded the company based on an abusive business model, and it's never changed.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 15 Jan 2016 @ 2:41pm

might be a good idea to spend that money on the USAs shit internet speed and choices and also to stop Hollywood and the entertainment industries from taking control of it! they already have almost every supposed democratic government falling over themselves to do whatever the industries demand! how about working for 'THE PEOPLE' for a change??
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
jlaprise (profile), 16 Jan 2016 @ 9:36am

Won't somebody please think of the children!
Enough already with the false moral outrage.

Facebook is first and foremost a business meaning that it's goal is (depending on your business theorist) profit or customer acquisition. If you believe the altruistic elements of their argument, that's on you. Welcome to modern global online marketing.

Furthermore, this is a perfect situation for invoking Hanlon's Razor: Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity. Improperly implemented or thought through marketing campaigns fall into the latter, especially when you consider other Facebook official comments noting how surprised they were at public reaction.

Oh and BTW India only has 20% Internet penetration leaving 1 billion people offline. For comparison, Facebook has about 1.5 billion regular users. Pretty much any tool or service that extends Internet access to the Unconnected is good. The Unconnected in India need all the help they can get.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- nasch (profile), 16 Jan 2016 @ 11:45am
  
  Re: Won't somebody please think of the children!
  Pretty much any tool or service that extends Internet access to the Unconnected is good.
  
  Yeah, but Free Basics isn't internet access.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - jlaprise (profile), 16 Jan 2016 @ 3:28pm
    
    Re: Re: Won't somebody please think of the children!
    Oh please...
    
    Free basics is not "full & free" Internet access. It provides access to limited spectrum of destinations. That said, I'll let users decide if a service of useful rather than making that determination for them.
    
    Everytime.
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
    - Anonymous Coward, 16 Jan 2016 @ 5:50pm
      
      Re: Re: Re: Won't somebody please think of the children!
      OK, this one gets a Funny vote.
      [ link to this | view in chronology ]
      - Anonymous Coward, 17 Jan 2016 @ 12:56pm
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re: Won't somebody please think of the children!
        The question with free basics, will it allow people to set up their own small shop fronts, wikipedia’s etc, or will that be limited to corporate sponsors?
        [ link to this | view in chronology ]
        
        jlaprise (profile), 18 Jan 2016 @ 9:20am
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Won't somebody please think of the children!
        At Facebook's discretion, yes.
        
        I understand that this is unacceptable for some. However, my broader point is that if Free Basics introduces people to a walled garden, those walls are low enough that people will see what's going on over the fence. If Free Basics fails to meet peoples' needs, they will look elsewhere for another service.
        
        Connecting the Unconnected is the first priority.
        [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Rajesh, 16 Jan 2016 @ 10:23pm

Mark Zuckerberg
Selfish and the desire to own the world. Never will he succeed because of his past. If he can't be loyal to one friend how can he be loyal to the world community?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]