European Court Of Human Rights May Have Just Outlawed Mass Surveillance Without Most People Realizing It
from the so-now-what? dept
While much of the focus in the past few years has been on surveillance conducted by the NSA for the US, it should be noted that many European countries do a ton of surveillance too -- often with fewer restrictions (though they may not be as good at it). And while there have been some high profile legal attacks on the surveillance done by the UK's GCHQ (a close partner of the NSA), CDT is noting that some little-watched cases in the European Court of Human Rights may have technically outlawed mass surveillance without most people even realizing it. It's two separate cases in particular, Roman Zakharov v. Russia and Szabo and Vissy v. Hungary:In Zakharov, the Court alluded to the possibility of broad indiscriminate surveillance only in passing, since the scenario it was considering was one in which the security services could start intercepting a telephone conversation at any time, but were not explicitly alleged to be intercepting all conversations (or related data such as the time and duration of calls) at all times. The Court found that a government may only intercept telephone communications where the body authorizing the surveillance has confirmed that there is a “reasonable suspicion” of wrongdoing on the part of “the person concerned.” This language, along with the Court’s statement that a surveillance authorization “must clearly identify a specific person … or a single set of premises” as the subject of the monitoring, seemed to set the stage for a ruling that UK-style society-wide surveillance programs such as Tempora are illegal under the ECHR.As the blog post from CDT recognizes, there is at least some confusion over what this ruling really means. So it's not as if it's entirely clear cut that mass surveillance has been banned in Europe. But, it's quite likely that these rulings will be relied on in other cases as well, and the fact that there are statements that basically require "individualized targeting" certainly suggests that most mass surveillance programs are illegal in Europe. That could make things fairly interesting for the many, many surveillance programs around Europe that are not even remotely close to "individually targeted."
In an unexpected form, that ruling may have arrived. Noting (as the Zakharov judges also did) that “a system of secret surveillance … may undermine or even destroy democracy under the cloak of defending it,” the Court in Szabo and Vissy considered whether the challenged Hungarian laws provide “adequate and effective guarantees against abuse.” The answer was no: the phrase “strictly necessary in a democratic society,” the Court explained for the first time, means not only that a surveillance measure must be strictly necessary for “safeguarding the democratic institutions” at a general level, but must also be “strictly necessary … for the obtaining of vital intelligence in an individual operation.” Crucially, the Court added that the Hungarian authorities must therefore interpret a law allowing surveillance authorizations to apply to “a range of persons”—which, as the Court observed, could potentially include everyone in Hungary—very narrowly. According to the Court, the body authorizing the surveillance must “verify whether sufficient reasons for intercepting a specific individual’s communications exist in each case.”
In other words: no gathering of an enormous indiscriminate haystack in order to search for a needle.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: eu, europe, european court of human rights, mass surveillance
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Good first step
Getting those running and supporting the surveillance programs to care about what is and is not legal.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Why on earth would they stop doing it in Europe when it is outlawed when they still have stopped in the US when it was made publicly illegal.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Good first step
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Definitions
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Fixed that for you
[ link to this | view in thread ]
"though they may not be as good at it"
Noone tops the English when it comes to sneakiness.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: "though they may not be as good at it"
We prefer to call it "creative innovation".
As in more Nobel Prizes per head than any othe country with a population > 10 Million.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_Nobel_laureates_per_capita
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Good first step
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: "though they may not be as good at it"
Maybe but we have a bigger tech pen0r! *smirks*
Now, now, kids, don't get too excited or you'll soil yourself like NSA over there.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Good first step
Problem solved - if those people are punished by jail time, and can't get away without punishment, then perhaps those clowns claiming we have nothing to fear might think.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
You just aren't thinking like a spook yet.
So the answer to the recent conundrum introduced by the European Court is clear, you've highlighted the solution yourself:
A country, say Germany, is a single set of premises, problem solved.
What that's too small, well Europe is a single set of premises, still too restrictive, how about Earth is a single set of premises.
I mean if the NSA can claim that an email message is a premises, or that anyone who talks, sends receives, or is mentioned by (out to seven hops) is a single target. Then for European agencies to claim that Europe is a single premises is just too easy. I mean look, it's even a singular noun.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: "though they may not be as good at it"
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/technology/10172298/One-surveillance-camera-for-every-11-people-in-Br itain-says-CCTV-survey.html
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re: "though they may not be as good at it"
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re: "though they may not be as good at it"
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re: "though they may not be as good at it"
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Alternate link?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Human rights and the law
Now it is time for the world to put one HUMAN right above all the others- that is the RIGHT to life and safety. We can all prioritize that one. If you want your life you can assume others probably want THEIRS.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: "though they may not be as good at it"
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: "though they may not be as good at it"
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: "though they may not be as good at it"
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Meh.
All the Darrell Issas and EFFs in the Universe are just spittin' into the wind as long as we keep electing jerks who can't be bothered to care about the electorate once they're elected.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Meh.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: "though they may not be as good at it"
[ link to this | view in thread ]
"Strictly Necessary"
[ link to this | view in thread ]