Canada Temporarily Drops Out Of Five Eyes Spying Coalition, After Realizing It Wasn't Properly Protecting Information
from the an-eye-for-an-eye dept
Of course, by now you know about the "Five Eyes" coalition of the signals intelligence agencies of the US, UK, Canada, Australia and New Zealand all sharing certain intelligence information between them. Some of the Snowden docs have made clear that this collaboration helps the various countries get around restrictions on "domestic" surveillance by effectively offshoring it to other "friendly" electronic spy agencies. Well, at least for now, it appears that that the Five Eyes effort has lost an Eye.Canada's signals intelligence agency, the Communications Security Establishment (CSE), has stopped sharing data with the other Four Eyes after realizing that it hadn't done a particularly good job of protecting the metadata it collected on Canadians.
"While I was conducting this current comprehensive review, CSE discovered on its own that certain metadata was not being minimized properly," Plouffe explained in the report.I guess it's nice that the CSE figured out that it had screwed up on its own, but really, it makes you wonder just how much information the Canadian gov't was sending abroad on its own citizens.
"Minimization is the process by which Canadian identity information contained in metadata is rendered unidentifiable prior to being shared …."
"The fact that CSE did not properly minimize Canadian identity information contained in certain metadata prior to being shared was contrary to the ministerial directive, and to CSE's operational policy."
Of course, the sharing will start back up again at some point in the future, once they've decided that they've properly "minimized" the data. And while Canadian politicians seem to be accepting the very Canadian apology of the CSE and saying that this was all an accident, shouldn't this kind of "mistake" lead to a bit more than a "sorry" and "we'll make sure it's better next time"? Shouldn't we be examining why such mass surveillance and data sharing are happening in the first place?
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: canada, five eyes, mass surveillance, metadata, minimization, nsa, sigint, surveillance
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
One does find it hard to believe that any changes in course are because of concern for the "little people" who have been wholesale sold out as they look for ways to bypass the laws put into place to protect us from exactly what they are doing.
These methods used in other countries are decried, while at the same time embraced by those who point fingers at the other guy. Perhaps they should notice while they are pointing at others there are 4 fingers pointing back that should be poked in the 4 other eyes.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
That, and a new government that has promised to open, transparent governance, that has much more Internet-savvy than the previous one, combined with an easy, clear call that doesn't really have any great cost.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
I agree it certainly sounds like CSE realized their "mistake" as soon as it looked like they were about to be caught by Plouffe, or maybe who he reports to.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Total Surviellance for Profit
Insider trading, blackmail and industrial espionage leap into mind.
Not only do defense contractors get lucrative contracts to create, service and operate the surveillance boondoggles system users and program insiders can benefit by using purloined data for personal gain.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
CSE, please hire better people.
What trusting sorts we Canucks can be. Now we get to have them play with C-51. Great. :-P
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Get a grip guy
http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2016/01/heres-every-government-agency-that-wants-your-metadata/
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
And also propose the more accurate term surveillance cartel. It has the right connotations.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
FVEY to FREY
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]