Rage Against The Convoluted 'Rage' Trademark Dispute
from the ragey-rage-rage dept
While Id Software is not a complete stranger to lame and opportunistic intellectual property disputes, I have to say the latest dispute involving the video gaming giant has me scratching my head. Via Newsweek, we learn that a small three-person game studio out of Costa Rica, called Green Lava Studios, is being forced to change the name of a port of its PC game, Fenix Rage, for its console release. Have you guessed why yet? No? Well, that's probably because the issue is over Id Software's game R.A.G.E., originally released in 2011. Id Software sent Green Lava Studios a cease and desist letter, citing its trademark on the word "rage" for the purposes of video games.
In October 2011, id Software developed and released a game called RAGE. The 3-D post-apocalyptic game received fairly positive reviews, but has since been largely forgotten. Three years later, in September 2014, Green Lava Studios released Fenix Rage on PC. Fenix Rage is a 2-D game in which players have to guide a superhero through hundreds of incredibly difficult puzzle-like levels. Nearly a full year after Fenix Rage’s release, the game was about to be ported to the Playstation 4 and Xbox One when the legal threat arrived.You may be wondering, as I was when originally looking into this, how it came to be that Id Software was challenging the release of the console version of a game that had already been released for PCs in 2014 without issue. The answer appears to be that Id software only registered the trademark for "Rage" in 2015, long after the release of its game, and long after the release of Green Lava Studios' Fenix Rage game on PC.
“We were told we would have to change our name or take this to court,” Ramírez tells Newsweek. “That is not an option because we don’t have the resources to do that.” Ramírez was running a three-man development team, small by the standards of most game studios, and felt he had an obligation to actually release a game.
While the name Fenix Rage would have to be changed for consoles, it can still be sold as Fenix Rage on PC. This is because id Software trademarked the word “Rage” on January 12, 2015, after Fenix Rage had already been released on PC.I'm going to summarize this, because when you put the timeline in a single instance, none of this makes sense: Id Software releases R.A.G.E. in 2011, Green Lava releases Fenix Rage on PC in 2014, Id Software trademarks "rage" in early 2015 and then disputes the release of a console port of Green Lava's PC game in late 2015 on into 2016. Let's not lose site of the key point in this: Fenix Rage has already been made and released. The console version is a port of that game. But now, because of the threat of the much larger Id Software and its trademark on the word "rage" granted several years after the release of its game, Green Lava is capitulating and changing the name of its console version.
“The game would be already launched,” Ramírez said when asked how much this whole affair has delayed the studio. “We’ve been delayed around six months now, and counting.”
The legal action completely demoralized the team at Green Lava Studios. ”It was really sad,” Ramírez said. “We got this award, the GameMaker Showcase Game of the Year. It was the first award our country had gotten for game making. We got it with the name Fenix Rage. That’s something we cannot mention now on consoles.”This, of course, is not what trademarks are for. Nowhere is anyone seriously going to believe there is any customer confusion at the heart of this. Rather, this is Id Software being Id Software and stomping on a small game studio in another country, seemingly for no other reason than because it can. Green Lava Studios should fight this, because it would likely win any dispute for any number of reasons. But you can't blame the much smaller company for being wary of a legal battle with a larger company. Trademark bullying, at its best.
Green Lava Studios ultimately settled on Fenix Furia for its console release. “We wanted to get a name and keep the same 'rage' attitude.” Ramírez said. “It’s a raging game, after all.”
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: fenix rage, r.a.g.e., rage, trademark
Companies: green lava studios, id software
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Response to: Anonymous Coward on Mar 4th, 2016 @ 4:04pm
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Wordrage
Brick Rage
Soccer Rage
Streets of Rage 1-3
Alien Rage
Rage Runner
Cyborg Rage
Rhino's Rago
Kung Fury: Street Rage
Rage Parking Simulator 2016
Go Home - Rage Incoming
Red Road Rage
Russian Road Rage 3D
Rush Hour Road Rage
The Simpsons Road Rage
Celtic Kings: Rage of War
Tales of Maj'eyal: Embers of Rage
And that's just a quick 10 minute search, not comprehensive. Should this not make the trademark invalid?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Which I think, while obviously based on "phoenix", is actually a non-generic trademark.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Not really ID
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Should have renamed it
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
People could still use them, just without trademark.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Sounds like a judge
A judge is nothing but the largest and most odorous turd to float to the top of the legal cesspool.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Agree, but ID's trademark registrations date back to 2011/2012
That said, I'm seeing several RAGE trademarks owned by ID that date back to 2011 and 2012, and nothing that became registered in 2015, so I'm wondering if the statement in the original article and repeated here that "id Software trademarked the word “Rage” on January 12, 2015" is in fact accurate.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Agree, but ID's trademark registrations date back to 2011/2012
Green Lava says "In the system in Costa Rica, that would take years to solve" but they may be confused. I know I am.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]