Court Says EFF Can Move Forward With Discovery In Its Big Case Against NSA Surveillance
from the this-could-get-interesting dept
Jewel v. NSA is the EFF's big case against the NSA over its surveillance efforts. It predates the Snowden revelations (from a lot), and stems from that time an AT&T technician, Mark Klein, just walked through the doors of the EFF to provide the organization with evidence that AT&T basically routes a bunch of data through NSA filters for "upstream" collection (part of the NSA's "702" collection program). The case has gone through a bunch of permutations and procedural issues, many of which have not gone the EFF's way, unfortunately. However, the latest is a big one: the judge has said that EFF can move forward with discovery efforts, basically requiring the government to turn over a bunch of information:You can read the ruling here, which is mostly just procedural details. Still, given how successful the US government has been in basically killing off any and every lawsuit that attempts to challenge its surveillance, getting to move forward on discovery is a big, big deal. Kudos to the EFF team.This marks the first time a party has been allowed to gather factual evidence from the NSA in a case involving the agency’s warrantless surveillance. The government had fought all our requests to proceed with this lawsuit, arguing that the state secrets privilege protects it against both discovery and liability. Judge White previously rejected that argument for our statutory claims under the Wiretap Act, the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act, the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, and the Stored Communications Act. This ruling affirms Judge White’s previous decision and opens the door for discovery.
This is an important step forward to lifting the cloak of secrecy that has thus far shielded the NSA from judicial scrutiny, and EFF looks forward to finally getting to the nuts and bolts of this extraordinarily important lawsuit.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: discovery, jewel v. nsa, mass surveillance, nsa, section 702, surveillance, upstream
Companies: eff
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
Our rights.. to be fleeced and spied upon and kept in the dark as much as possible.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
But hey, I'm just a madman.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Donate to EFF!
"Nobody does more lasting good for the Internet with less. Every penny you donate makes change for the better." — Cory Doctorow
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
~NSA
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
A bunch?
with evidence that AT&T basically routes ALL data through NSA filters. FTFA Mike.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: A bunch?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Two things to expect:
The judge can order them to hand over documents, but I doubt they have enough of a spine to call the NSA out when(not 'if') the NSA hands over documents that are all but useless.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
You know, stuff like: "They sued under false pretenses to get access to top secret documents, but what they wanted all along was to share that sensitive information with TERRORISTS! Won't someone think of the children yer honor?".
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Choose one:
1. eaten by the dog.
2. lost in a fire/earthquake/during a lightning storm/in an undocumented terrorist attack.
3. erased during a computer malfunction
4. erased during a hard drive malfunction
5. never recorded
6. re-categorized as pertaining to National Security and rendered unavailable.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
8. Hacked
[ link to this | view in chronology ]