New Hampshire Legislator Introduces Bill Protecting Libraries' Right To Run Tor Relays
from the privacy-shouldn't-be-considered-inherently-suspicious dept
A small town library in New Hampshire that went to war with the DHS over a Tor relay has become the unlikely impetus for new legislation aimed at protecting public libraries from government overreach.
New Hampshire state legislators have introduced a new bill that allows public libraries to run privacy software like Tor.Libraries have occasionally been the frontline for privacy skirmishes. "Warrant canaries" are a library creation. In the case of the Kilton Public Library, the DHS stepped in and demanded the Tor relay it was running for use by patrons be shut down. The library fought back, eventually forcing the DHS to back down.
The bill, crafted by State Rep. Keith Ammon (R) and sponsored by six other lawmakers, emphasizes the role that encryption and privacy tools will play in upholding the long tradition of privacy in public libraries.
“Public libraries ... have upheld and protected patron privacy as one of their core values since 1939,” the bill reads. “In a library (physical or virtual), the right to privacy is the right to open inquiry without having the subject of one’s interest examined or scrutinized by others.”
To prevent this sort of thing from happening again, Ammon's bill would grant libraries the right to run Tor relays and other software to protect users' anonymity.
Public libraries may allow the installation and use of cryptographic privacy platforms on public library computers for library patrons use. Cryptographic privacy software shall include Tor or other privacy software that encrypts user's information to protect it from surveillance or collection. Public libraries may also support infrastructure for cryptographic software that helps to promote a free and open Internet, such as running Tor relays. Public libraries shall not give records relative to use of cryptographic privacy software to a government agency without first providing written notice to the person in question.This is likely to run into law enforcement opposition, even though there have been very few prosecutions linked to abuse of public library computers.
The Library Freedom Project continues to push ahead with its plan to install Tor exit relays in as many public libraries as possible. Despite the DHS no longer demanding relays be shut down and begrudgingly accepting the fact that running a relay is not an illegal act -- nor even a reasonably suspicious one -- the agency still insists Tor is mostly just there to cover up criminal activity.
The use of a Tor browser is not, in and of itself, illegal. There are legitimate purposes for its use. Originally designed, implemented and deployed by [the] United States Naval Research Laboratory, Tor affords users a way to share information over public networks without compromising their privacy. However, the protections that Tor offers can be attractive to criminal enterprises or actors and HSI will continue to pursue those individuals who seek to use the anonymizing technology to further their illicit activity.In fact, as Ars Technica's Cyrus Farivar pointed out on Twitter, the DHS is still holding onto some bitterness from being shouted down by a tiny public library.
Newly-released DHS email mocks @flexlibris et al’s efforts, citing this @arstechnica story. https://t.co/zUS3sd3v8K pic.twitter.com/uCTaSvoFqB
— Cyrus Farivar (@cfarivar) February 18, 2016
Just terrific…… that kid seems to be thinking an inch past the end of her noseThis isn't likely to be the end of government efforts to shut down the use of encryption/anonymization software by publicly-accessible entities. But, if the legislation passes intact, future battles will be fought somewhere other than New Hampshire.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: encryption, keith ammon, libraries, new hampshire, privacy, tor
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Funny thing
Thank you; Streisand Effect!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Perhaps they could take a lesson from her.
Rather than looking down the road at some giant picture of a possible outcome, look at the first steps you are taking.
Much of the policy & plotting seems to be based on the ends will always justify the means... pity that to get to those ends one has to erode everything you claim to be protecting for us.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Tone deaf
Whoever made that comment has no sense of irony; narrow-minded entitlement is an attitude all too common in law enforcement.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Addendum
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Tone deaf
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Quote
The quote you provided does not actually say that. Is there some other quote where they actually insist Tor is mostly for criminal activity, or are you just extrapolating from what they said to what you think they believe?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Sure, it can be used to hide such things, but for it to be the first thing to pop up in my mind in regards to "privacy", the government and social media have really dulled my senses of this.
I still go for privacy though.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Cut off my nose...
It seems that the Special Agent that made this comment is VERY representative of all of the Three Letter Agencies where they'd rather cut off their nose to spite their face... Since they apparently can't see past the end of their nose.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
(Porn guys. I'm talking about watching porn).
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
No they didn't. You just made that up. Did you even read all the stories from September 2015 you linked?
"went to war with the DHS" is laughable hyperbole, but this is just blatantly false.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
They expressed concern, but it's a pretty severe overstatement to say they "demanded" the Tor relay be shut down. The original story doesn't even make that claim, so it's not clear why Tim wrote that here.
https://www.techdirt.com/articles/20150910/13090332217/first-library-to-support-tor-anonymous-i nternet-browsing-effort-stops-after-dhs-email.shtml
[ link to this | view in chronology ]