Prosecutor Disciplined For Using Fake Facebook Profile To Meddle In Murder Case
from the wrists-sufficiently-slapped,-says-state-Supreme-Court dept
Setting up fake social media accounts: law enforcement officers do it, even though it's the same sort of activity they arrest others for. The DEA does it, but it ended up setting the DOJ taxpayers back $134,000. Generally, it's a bad idea. There's nothing inherently private about public social media accounts, but lines are crossed when law enforcement sets up fake accounts and interacts with suspects, rather than just quietly lurking and snagging passing public communications.
An assistant county prosecutor assigned to a murder case decided he could crack the case by pretending to be the jilted lover of one of the suspects. The attorney, Aaron Brockler, made several questionable moves on his way to being fired and having his license to practice law suspended by the Supreme Court of Ohio. (h/t Courthouse News)
Brockler first took advantage of the fact that calls from jails are routinely recorded.
As part of his investigation, Brockler listened to recordings of telephone calls that Dunn had made from the Cuyahoga County Jail. On the morning of December 14, 2012, he listened to a recording of a heated conversation in which Dunn and Mossor argued over Dunn’s fear that Mossor would not be a reliable witness and Mossor’s belief that Dunn had not been faithful to her. Mossor suspected that Dunn had had a romantic relationship with a woman named “Taisha” and indicated that if her suspicion was true, she would end her relationship with Dunn. Believing that Mossor’s relationship with Dunn was near a breaking point, Brockler saw an opportunity to exploit her feelings of distrust and get her to recant her support for Dunn.Using this info, Brockler set up a fake Facebook account under the name of "Taisha Little." He populated his friends list with people linked to Dunn via HIS Facebook page, as well as info gathered from phone call recordings. Brockler did attempt to coordinate with local law enforcement in this effort, but apparently felt they weren't moving fast enough.
So, he struck out on his own, initiating Facebook chats with Dunn's girlfriend, claiming his alter ego had an 18-month-old child fathered by the suspect. He also made comments about the credibility of Dunn's alibi, hoping to receive verification that it was false. After several hours of this, Brockler felt the two people he was chatting with were growing suspicious, so he shut down the account and deleted. He also printed out copies of his conversations.
Of course, all of this was done with the purest of intentions, including the withholding of this information from defense counsel.
He testified that he printed copies of the chats and placed them in a file—with the intent to provide copies to defense counsel—before he deleted the account, but those copies were never found. He attended five pretrial conferences from January through April 2013 but did not disclose the circumstances or content of his conversations with Mossor or Lewis.Brockler went on medical leave and the files were turned over to another assistant prosecutor. This one immediately turned over the information to the defense counsel and began to investigate "Taisha Little." Brockler did not inform the new assistant prosecutor that he was "Taisha Little" until three weeks later. Brockler was fired shortly thereafter.
[...]
Brockler also disclosed that he might need to be a witness at trial because both Mossor and Lewis had told him they would not support Dunn’s alibi, although they were afraid to say so in court. Brockler did not disclose how he obtained that information.
He defended himself in an interview with the Cleveland Plain Dealer, stating he had really done nothing wrong.
The subsequently published article and broadcasted interview included statements by Brockler—which he does not dispute—to the effect that (1) prosecutors have long engaged in ruses to obtain the truth, (2) his firing was an overreaction because he only did what the police should have done, (3) he engaged in an investigative ruse to uncover the truth and keep a murderer behind bars, (4) the public was better off because of his actions, (5) if he had not taken these actions, a murderer might be walking the streets, (6) he promised the victim’s mother that he would not let a horrible killer walk out of the courthouse to kill someone else, and (7) McGinty chose to follow the technical rules of ethics, while he chose to protect the public.He then went to the disciplinary board and asked it to carve out an exception for his misconduct. The board refused to do so.
Instead, the board found that Prof.Cond.R. 8.4(c) requires an assistant prosecutor to refrain from dishonesty, fraud, deceit, or misrepresentation when personally engaging in investigatory activity and that Brockler’s Facebook ruse therefore violated the rule.Furthermore, the board found Brockler's misconduct aggravated by several factors.
[T]he board found that Brockler’s deceptions and misrepresentations in his contacts with Mossor and Lewis resulted in multiple violations of Prof.Cond.R. 8.4(c) and (d), though it treated them as a single instance of misconduct. See Gov.Bar R. V(13)(B)(4). The board also found that his extrajudicial statements to the media, deflecting blame for his own misconduct to the police department and the prosecutor’s office, undermined the public’s confidence in the criminal-justice process.Unfortunately, the end result is a slap on the wrist: a 12-month suspension, fully-stayed, which means Brockler can continue to practice law during the duration of his "punishment." He may not be able to do this at his "dream job" (the county prosecutor's office) but he's not prevented from earning income as an attorney either.
Two judges dissented, however. Hearteningly, they're not concerned the court has come down too heavily on the disgraced former prosecutor. Instead, they're both of the opinion the punishment is far, far too light.
Chief Justice O'Connor:
By imposing a marginal sanction—a fully stayed one-year suspension—on respondent, Aaron Brockler, the majority minimizes his significant ethical violations and does so based upon a myopic view of the Rules of Professional Conduct. The men and women who serve as prosecutors in this state are authorized to enforce the law and administer justice, one of the noblest pursuits an attorney can enjoy. Accordingly, they must meet or exceed the highest ethical standards imposed on our profession. Given the significant ethical violations Brockler committed, I cannot implicitly condone the imposition of a negligible sanction for his egregious misconduct.O'Connor (along with two other dissenting judges) finds a much harsher punishment better fits Brockler's wrongdoing.
Because I believe that the court’s sanction in this case is entirely incongruous with Brockler’s behavior, I cannot subscribe to it. For his ethical misdeeds, I would indefinitely suspend Brockler’s license to practice law in the state of Ohio.In Brockler's own words, the ends justifies the means. Fortunately, the disciplinary board and the state Supreme Court didn't agree with him. Unfortunately, the majority decision makes it clear the state is willing to put up with a lot of misconduct before it will consider someone unfit to practice law.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: aaron brockler, law enforcement, ohio, social media
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Not even the shell of a punishment
That's not punishment for his actions, that's just placing him in a position where his actions don't make the state look bad.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Not even the shell of a punishment
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
We should be shocked by the lack of real punishment here, but honestly we've come to expect this sort of special treatment.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Who the heck is Lewis?
... but did not disclose the circumstances or content of his conversations with Mossor or Lewis.
Shortly thereafter we get this mention of Lewis:
... both Mossor and Lewis had told him they would not support Dunn’s alibi ...
But that doesn't clear it up at all. And then the final mention:
... Brockler’s deceptions and misrepresentations in his contacts with Mossor and Lewis resulted in multiple violations ...
Which also doesn't shed any light. If I was forced to guess, mine would be that Lewis is the actual person that DA Brockler was imitating with his "Taisha Little" persona, but that's complete speculation
This is not the first time I've noticed names being dropped into stories on TD with no reference to who they are / what they have to do with the story. You can do better.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Who the heck is Lewis?
Maybe it's not exceptionally clear---a little more editing might have helped---but it's not exactly hidden either.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Who the heck is Lewis?
And that still doesn't say anything about who Lewis is and how they're connected to the case.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Who the heck is Lewis?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Who the heck is Lewis?
Tell me who Lewis is from this article. What role does (s)he play (other than someone who had a FB chat with Brockler ... but how is that relevant?!?)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Who the heck is Lewis?
Lighten up, Francis. Nothing in nasch's comment deserved your response.
I had trouble myself figuring out who was who between Lewis, Dunn, Mossor and McGinty. After rereading the article a few times I simply gave up.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Who the heck is Lewis?
Meanwhile, the adults have already settled the matter. You can go back to being sanctimonious in your playpen now, ok?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Who the heck is Lewis?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Who the heck is Lewis?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Who the heck is Lewis?
Again, my apologies.
Funny that we *still* don't know who this Lewis is. I suppose I could Google it and find out, but should I really have to? I don't think so.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Computer Fraud and Abuse Act
I seem to recall that CFAA has been stretched, twisted and construed to include violating a web site's TOS. (terms of service)
I don't know which social media sites the prosecutor might have created a fake account on, and have not read it's TOS (terms of slavery), but I strongly suspect that the prosecutor was in violation of the social media site's TOS.
Now if you connect the dots*, the prosecutor should have been threatened with 35 years in prison. After all, what's good for Aaron Swartz is good for the prosecutor.
But then there's that 'high court, low court' thing. And old boy networks. And blue wall of silence. Etc. So I guess that makes it all okay.
And they wonder why the courts, court officers, law enforcement and its officers, the law, the legislature and the government are not respected. They demand your respect! Right now!
* remedial 'connect the dots' because these days too few people are able to 'do the math'.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Don't the ends justify the means?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
He defended himself in an interview with the Cleveland Plain Dealer, stating he had really done nothing wrong."
Erm, at the very least you deliberately withheld information from people that led to 3 weeks of wasted work from your department. Information about something you did that's wasting everyone's time. On certain projects at some companies I've worked at, that would be enough to make me surprised I got out with all my limbs still attached.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]