Techdirt Podcast Episode 63: Hacking The Patent System
from the don't-wait,-innovate dept
We all know the patent system is riddled with problems, and badly in need of reform. But reform comes slowly — really, really slowly. So some tech companies have been doing what they do best: innovate. They are finding ways to get around the biggest problems of the patent system without waiting on go-nowhere legislative reform efforts. This week we're joined by Julie Samuels, President of the Board at Engine, to discuss the innovation-based approach to navigating the patent system and changing patent culture with a focus on a new paper from Engine and EFF on hacking the patent system.
Follow the Techdirt Podcast on Soundcloud, subscribe via iTunes, or grab the RSS feed. You can also keep up with all the latest episodes right here on Techdirt.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: engine, innovation, julie samuels, patents, podcast
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
The next time Apple stumbles upon one of these patents and sues someone else for patent infringement of one of their patents the company should sue Apple in return claiming breach of license.
and 20 year patent terms is too long for tech patents and possibly for any types of patents. Investors aren't looking 20 years ahead, they are realistically looking maybe 5 months ahead. The present value of a future return 20 years from now attenuates fast so, from a financial perspective, it doesn't make sense.
Especially given tech patents. Heck, IIRC, hyperthreading is still under patent and it is this patent that has hindered AMD from advancing their processors.
[ link to this | view in thread ]