Conspiracy Theories Over Steam Game Suddenly Crashing Wrong; Just More Broken Anti-Piracy Code

from the crash-override dept

Mon, Mar 14th 2016 11:23pm — Timothy Geigner

If you follow video game news as I do, you probably came across a fascinating and somewhat thrilling series of speculative stories revolving around a game called Spintires, which is being sold through the Steam platform. The driving game had been selling for some time, and selling fairly well, when all of the sudden it stopped working. Just like that, the game was crashing all over the place. Some sites, including this later-updated Gamasutra post, began digging into a wellspring of conspiracy theories about purposeful sabotage by the developer over money disputes with the publisher.

There may be something rotten in the state of Spintires, as the game's players have taken to Reddit and its official forum recently to complain about alleged "time bombs" hidden in the code by the game's developer that are rendering it unplayable.

The reason that a conspiracy theory like this found purchase rather than being laughed away was the rocky history between the developer of the game, Pavel Zagrebelnyy, with the game's publisher, Oovee Game Studios. Just a week before the crashing of the game began, Zagrebelnyy had been participating in interviews with sites and offering up less than flattering comments about Oovee.

"They owe me a s***load of money according to our contract," Pavel tells me in a new interview. "But I don't have any leverage because my judicial skills are zero. I haven't had a meaningful communication with Oovee for many months (maybe a year)."

Oovee, in the same post, acknowledges that it has been late in paying Zagrebelnyy, but promises that this will be corrected. A week later, the game of Zagrebelnyy's that Oovee published is suddenly broken and unplayable. At that point, Oovee released a statement, acknowledging that the crashes were a widespread issue and stating that those crashes were "date-related." The internet took that statement and ran with it, extrapolating it into a tale in which Zagrebelnyy had inserted time-bomb bits of code into the game that could be weaponized to cause it to crash on certain days or within certain date-ranges if he were so motivated, say by a lack of being paid by the publisher.

But that speculation and the conspiracy theory behind it then crashed upon comments from Zagrebelnyy and Oovee, which acknowledge to the theorists that, naaaah, it's just another case of anti-piracy efforts fucking things up for all the legitimate customers.

Zagrebelnyy gave the following response:

"Well, I dont understand who and why started the rumours of sabotaging - apparently they are based on reverse engineering Spintires code? Anyways, publisher (Oovee) have the source codes so they know (they should) I didn't sabotage Spintires - there is no such code! But there is in fact a time-related bug (a self-check uses time functions to see if game wasn't cracked by pirates) which was not fixed in time (because we have little to no communicating with Oovee.)"

And Oovee:

"We are aware of recent press speculation relating to sabotage of the spintires game by the lead developer Pavel. We wish to express our displeasure at this speculation and totally refute these and other recent allegations. It is a shame that some press are reporting this without talking to us, and even saying in some articles they are yet to talk to us. The situation on the bug is that we became aware of a major bug last week that caused the game to stop for some users."

And so another conspiracy theory falls, this times at the hands of faulty DRM. I'll put this here so nobody has to in the comments: never blame malice when incompetence is just as likely. Or maybe just blame DRM always and for everything. You're going to be right a decent amount of the time.

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team

Filed Under: anti-piracy, crashes, drm, pavel zagrebelnyy, spintires, steam, video games
Companies: oovee game studios

36 Comments

If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...

Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread

That One Guy (profile), 14 Mar 2016 @ 9:39pm

Ready. Fire. Aim.
But there is in fact a time-related bug (a self-check uses time functions to see if game wasn't cracked by pirates) which was not fixed in time (because we have little to no communicating with Oovee.)"

Of course in true DRM fashion I imagine the pirated copies were the only ones that weren't crashing, because they would have stripped that code out as soon as they noticed it.

DRM: For when you want to take careful aim at pirates, and hit nothing but your paying customers instead.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 15 Mar 2016 @ 12:31am

Malice...
I, for one, would argue that DRM *is* malice codified: it takes a specific aim to disable or destroy the experience for a specific segment of your audience.

One may argue whether it is justified or not, but that doesn't take away the fact that it is an intentional attempt at exclusion.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it

Whatever (profile), 15 Mar 2016 @ 1:59am

" Or maybe just blame DRM always and for everything. You're going to be right a decent amount of the time"

So can we blame DRM for Leigh's overwhelmingly bad music career?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Anonymous Coward, 15 Mar 2016 @ 2:56am
  
  Re:
  Yep. The music software used was broken by David Lowery, Jsmes Comey and Barack Obama, clearly!
  
  IT'S ALL A CONSPIRACY!!!
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - Anonymous Coward, 15 Mar 2016 @ 5:04am
    
    Re: Re:
    You two seriously need to get a room.
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
    - Anonymous Coward, 15 Mar 2016 @ 8:12am
      
      Re: Re: Re:
      My apologies. Poe's Law struck again.
      [ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Anonymous Coward, 15 Mar 2016 @ 3:01am
  
  Re:
  So that's what you're left to do - resort to criticizing something completely unrelated to the topic at hand. And you whine when people rightfully call you a troll.
  
  DMCAed.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Ninja (profile), 15 Mar 2016 @ 4:11am
  
  Re:
  DRM is fairly recent so we can't blame it for breaking some game back then and making your parents look for other means of entertainment leading to your birth. This alone would be reason enough to outlaw it.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - Keroberos (profile), 15 Mar 2016 @ 5:29am
    
    DRM is not a recent invention
    The original US NES (1985) had a lockout chip which was designed to block unlicensed games from playing on the system, but also caused problems with legitimate game playback. On PC The Secret of Monkey Island (1990) had the "Dial a Pirate" wheel, and Night Hawk: F-117A Stealth Fighter 2.0 (1991) had an aircraft identification system so you could not play without the manual. So, DRM systems since 1985? 30+ years ago? Not very recent.
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
    - Rich, 15 Mar 2016 @ 5:55am
      
      Re: DRM is not a recent invention
      Even games for the Apple II (1977) had DRM in them to keep them from being copied. The Intellivision II (1982) had a change in the ROM to purposely break 3rd party games.
      [ link to this | view in chronology ]
    - Ninja (profile), 15 Mar 2016 @ 7:21am
      
      Re: DRM is not a recent invention
      Well, it wasn't widespread so there is that.
      [ link to this | view in chronology ]
      - JoeCool (profile), 15 Mar 2016 @ 12:32pm
        
        Re: Re: DRM is not a recent invention
        It was fairly widespread. Every computer out had some form of DRM on all their games, and the big ones had several forms of DRM. In '82, Atari 8-bit games mostly had extra sectors on the disk. You would read the track to find the sector with the extra copy to verify the disk. That was too easy to copy, so they started making tracks that were too long for regular drives to copy. By '85, The Goonies came out with the new DRM - "weak bit" protection. Reading a sector with weak bits would return different data every time. The Goonies would read the sector eight times and fail if the same data was read even once. 16-bit computers like the Amiga made DRM on floppies into an art form. Disk copiers got pretty sophisticated on copying disks, with the bigger ones releasing an update after every game that featured a new DRM that couldn't be handled by the copier. The 80's and 90's were the Golden Age of floppy DRM. The late 90's and 2000's were the Golden Age of CD DRM. The 10's is now the Golden Age of online DRM.
        [ link to this | view in chronology ]
        
        Anonymous Coward, 15 Mar 2016 @ 12:49pm
        
        Re: Re: Re: DRM is not a recent invention
        The first use of lasers in relation to computers was the trick of burning part of a sector, so that any data written to it could no be read back. That started the the pirates down the path of removing the DRM.
        [ link to this | view in chronology ]
    - PaulT (profile), 15 Mar 2016 @ 7:26am
      
      Re: DRM is not a recent invention
      "On PC The Secret of Monkey Island (1990) had the "Dial a Pirate" wheel"
      
      Easily lost/broken for the legitimate owner, easily photocopied for the pirate.
      
      "Night Hawk: F-117A Stealth Fighter 2.0 (1991) had an aircraft identification system so you could not play without the manual"
      
      Not true. You could play with a photocopy of the relevant pages. IIRC, most such games only asked for 20-30 pages from the manual rather than the whole thing, so a pirate could easily find out which were required and supply their copies accordingly. Plus, the pirated discs I've seen of games from that era were usually hacked either to remove those requests or accept any random answer as correct. So, again, legitimate owners were screwed if the manual got lost/damaged while the pirate never needed to set eyes on one.
      
      The other fundamental issue with DRM also remains from those days - the game assumes everyone is a pirate and only lets you use your legally purchased property if you can prove otherwise. That some attempts were humorous doesn't make them any less odious than the modern versions that require no human interaction.
      
      "So, DRM systems since 1985? 30+ years ago? Not very recent."
      
      Not recent, but the fundamental problems remain the same.
      [ link to this | view in chronology ]
      - JoeCool (profile), 15 Mar 2016 @ 12:35pm
        
        Re: Re: DRM is not a recent invention
        Didn't you love those games that came with the manual on red paper with blue type in an effort to make photocopies fail? You wound up with people making text files from the manuals by hand to get around the issue.
        [ link to this | view in chronology ]
    - baditup (profile), 15 Mar 2016 @ 10:01am
      
      Re: DRM is not a recent invention
      also, trying to copy a rented VHS (or most all, i don't remember) resulted in the original and copy being magnetized and useless.... Ah, analog.... :)
      [ link to this | view in chronology ]
      - John Fenderson (profile), 15 Mar 2016 @ 10:19am
        
        Re: Re: DRM is not a recent invention
        Ahh yes, good old Macrovision. Technically, though, it didn't "magnetize" the copy or anything. It stripped the sync signals from the encoding, which made it impossible for VHS players to keep a stable picture.
        
        But those sync signals could be replaced, so Macrovision was not terribly effective as an antipiracy measure. What it was GREAT at was preventing you from being able connect your VHS system to your TV and then playing external video sources through it, which meant everyone had to use those stupid physical switches.
        [ link to this | view in chronology ]
        
        JoeCool (profile), 15 Mar 2016 @ 11:27am
        
        Re: Re: Re: DRM is not a recent invention
        Actually, it doesn't strip the sync, it changes the level of the sync. TVs would pick up the sync just fine (well, MOST would), but VCRs were required by Macrovision (and their purchased laws) to use bad sync extraction circuits so they WOULDN'T pick up the sync, thus causing bad copies. For a while, even broadcast TV was doing this for "premiere" broadcasts of movies and TV shows.
        
        You may have noticed (I sure did) that OLD VCRs would handle Macrovision just fine, but new VCRs were completely borked. They often choked even when MV wasn't present because of those twitchy sync extraction circuits.
        [ link to this | view in chronology ]
        
        John Fenderson (profile), 15 Mar 2016 @ 3:52pm
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re: DRM is not a recent invention
        Yes, you're correct. I hadn't given this stuff a thought in a long time!
        [ link to this | view in chronology ]
- PaulT (profile), 15 Mar 2016 @ 4:11am
  
  Re:
  No, but the fact that you immediately resorted to personal attacks is a refreshingly honest admission that you have nothing. At least, compared to your usual tactic of spouting blithering nonsense in an attempt to distract from the valid points in the article.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it
    
    Whatever (profile), 15 Mar 2016 @ 4:35am
    
    Re: Re:
    Proof that you guys have absolutely no sense of humor. I guess that part of you got DRM'ed, right?
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
    - Anonymous Coward, 15 Mar 2016 @ 5:06am
      
      Re: Re: Re:
      So you complain about trolling... then try to play off your own sad attempt as "humor". I guess logging out to scream about PaulT and flag everyone from multiple IP addresses is a sense of humor, right?
      
      Physician heal thyself!
      [ link to this | view in chronology ]
    - PaulT (profile), 15 Mar 2016 @ 7:15am
      
      Re: Re: Re:
      Oh, we have senses of humour. You're just not funny. But, at least the above was just a weak attempt at a joke rather than a weak attempt at being serious, which again is a nice change of pace.
      [ link to this | view in chronology ]
    - Anonymous Coward, 15 Mar 2016 @ 8:23am
      
      Re: Re: Re:
      No, you just need some new jokes. That one's getting real old.
      [ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Anonymous Coward, 15 Mar 2016 @ 6:06am
  
  Re:
  yes
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 15 Mar 2016 @ 2:41am

Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity (or bad QA).
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Bergman (profile), 15 Mar 2016 @ 7:53pm
  
  Re:
  True, but it's reasonable to suspect malice if the QA is consistently bad on only one part of otherwise-awesomely written code.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Capt ICE Enforcer, 15 Mar 2016 @ 3:26am

Kanye West
Interestingly, Kanye West copy still works without issue.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Ninja (profile), 15 Mar 2016 @ 4:14am

Or maybe just blame DRM always and for everything.

Or rather a broken copyright system. DRM is but a teratogenic manifestation of copyright.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Slinky (profile), 15 Mar 2016 @ 6:09am

DRM in Games
DRM in Games prove to be just an "extra burden" on the CPU/GPU to process. I have seen comparisons of games with and without DRM. It is obvious that DRM is slowing down the game and the framerate under various circumstances.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Scote, 15 Mar 2016 @ 6:12am

Why not just admit that DRM *is* a form of sabotage?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Bergman (profile), 15 Mar 2016 @ 7:54pm
  
  Re:
  Because if that sabotage harms or impedes a computer in any meaningful way, the manufacturer of the software would be criminally liable under laws like the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Digitari, 15 Mar 2016 @ 6:43am

Um Duh
DRM = Damaged Retail Material

I thought everyone already knew this.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 15 Mar 2016 @ 9:56am

which was not fixed in time (because we have little to no communicating with Oovee.)

So... YES, a time bomb, and NO, not a deliberate one.

But I bet that Zagrebelnyy has found it useful in facilitating communication, and Oovee has found it a cautionary tale about being uncommunicative.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 15 Mar 2016 @ 11:06am

Way to go Techdirt
Letting mere facts get in the way of a perfectly good conspiracy theory.

Harumph!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 16 Mar 2016 @ 12:36pm

I uninstalled the Steam client not because of shitty DRM but because it was scanning my Music directory.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]