Maryland Court Suppresses Evidence Gathered By Warrantless Stingray Use
from the court:-a-pen-register-order-is-not-even-close-to-the-same-thing dept
The Maryland Special Appeals Court isn't buying government lawyers' arguments that warrantless deployment of Stingray devices has no 4th Amendment implications. The government had argued that "everyone knows" phones generate location data when turned on and this information is "shared with the rest of the world" (but most importantly with law enforcement).
The court has yet to release its written opinion, but it did issue a one-page order upholding the lower court's suppression of evidence related to law enforcement's use of a Stingray. This ruling is especially important in Maryland, where Baltimore police have used the devices hundreds of times a year without seeking warrants or notifying judges and defendants about the origins of evidence.
The ruling has the potential to set a strong precedent about warrantless location tracking. “Police should now be on notice,” said Nate Wessler, a staff attorney with the ACLU’s Speech, Privacy, and Technology Project. “Accurately explain your surveillance activities to a judge and get a warrant, or risk your evidence being thrown out.”As has been noted here, the Baltimore police use pen register orders to deploy Stingrays, allowing it obscure the usage of the devices as well as to avail itself of lower evidentiary demands. This won't be the case going forward. The court has (at least orally) expressed its displeasure with the Baltimore PD's deceptive tactics.
During the oral argument before the appeals court in February, one of the judges called the police’s pen register application a “completely false document,” and “completely disingenuous.”As The Intercept notes, this is the first time a US court has suppressed evidence gathered with warrantless Stingray deployments. More will probably follow -- not because the Maryland Special Appeals Court decision will affect courts in other states -- but because more and more information on these devices and how law enforcement deploys them is coming to light.
The government tends to rely on the Third Party Doctrine. While courts may consider the connection and data collected by Stingrays to fall under this doctrine, they're far less likely to find law enforcement's secrecy and deception acceptable. On top of that, using a cell tower spoofer for real-time tracking isn't like deploying a pen register at all, even if judges find the lower evidentiary standard acceptable.
Pen register orders historically involved static phones. The location of the suspect was already known. All law enforcement was looking for was data on incoming and outgoing calls from certain numbers. With Stingrays, law enforcement is trying to find a suspect, not whoever that person is calling (even though that information will be gathered as well). And in order to do so, it has to place itself between hundreds or thousands of non-suspects and the receiving parties of their phone calls and messages. This location tracking and collection of non-relevant data needs to be held to a higher standard, and this decision from Maryland may finally be the start of that.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: due process, evidence, imsi catcher, maryland, stingray
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Technology
The only solution is to provide culpability when law enforcement steps over the line. No lawyer in their right mind would believe that an NDA signed with a private company provides a legal basis for committing perjury to a judge.
Some heavy jail time in genpop would do wonders for these problems, but nothing else will.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Technology
If cops know that using a stingray without a warrant(or ideally using one at all) means that any evidence gathered from it is going to be tossed, then they're either going to(in order of preference on their part) engage in evidence laundering to make it seem as thought the evidence came from another source, or not bother with the stingray in the first place.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Technology
They will simply lie, lie, lie and count on the courts' deference to police to protect them from jail. It's what they do.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Technology
Fifty years ago there were labor limits on how many wiretaps could be performed, and what information could be extracted from them. Today every electronic communication is swept up illegally. The head of the FBI prevaricates to Congress and SCOTUS, and brags about it. Refuses to answer questions to a Congressional inquirey committee, and gets away with it.
Police shoot people in the back, destroy evidence of same, hide other evidence of same, and nothing happens.
What makes you think that things are going to get better?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re: Technology
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re: Technology
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Technology
Government and corruption is not a new or recent thing. Most people fail to recognize the more people suffer under the weight of their own government more than any other human cause problem, including war!
There are very damn good reasons why the Founding Father said... eternal vigilance is the price of Liberty. We must wake up each and every day ready to fight government corruption because it is a never ending battle!
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Technology
There is nothing new under the sun, this line reveals a fundamental ignorance that pervades society in general.
There is always a problem to face and there has never been a time that is non problematic. A great example of how there is always a call that "This years election is the most important election of our time".
Well guess what! The forges of corruption burn hot and the blacksmiths hammer tirelessly to forge the shackles that bind you down for the sake of political and social expediency... and you all seem to be willing captives!
Perhaps you have a bit of Stockholm syndrome. You might begin to understand the moment the gaze of a corruption turns its way towards you.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Shared with the rest of the world?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
The NDA itself needs to be legally challenged. It's akin to a non-compete: the court will recognize and enforce if there's a time limit and a distance limit, and both are judged reasonable. No limit(s) or limit judged unreasonable and the courts will declare said non-compete unenforceable. NDAs need to be on the same standing.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Technology
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Technology
So does that really improve anything for the public, or just make their job a little more inconvenient?
[ link to this | view in thread ]