Internet Protections Enshrined In Brazil's Marco Civil Framework Under Threat From New Laws

from the this-is-why-we-can't-have-nice-things dept

Mon, Apr 25th 2016 12:40pm — Glyn Moody

A couple of years ago, Techdirt wrote about Brazil's Marco Civil -- variously called a "constitution for the Internet," and a "Magna Carta for the Web." Whatever you want to call it, the Marco Civil was a heartening example of the rights of Internet users being strengthened for a change. In June 2015, one year after it passed, an article on the Council on Foreign Relations site noted its wide-ranging impact:

The Marco Civil has been instrumental in curbing the power of the Brazilian government from having undue influence over the net and its content. The law prevents the government from taking down or regulating content, or exercising any pressure on online platforms (e.g. the Twitters and YouTubes of the world) or Internet service providers. Only the courts, by means of due process, and limited by clear legal thresholds, can actually take action regarding online content when it infringes on other rights.

Of course, this was too good to last. As Andrew McLaughlin explains on Medium, the Marco Civil is in danger: Amid the tumult and chaos of Brazil's current (and colossal) political crisis, the moment of counter-attack has arrived. Under the guise of fighting "cybercrime", a group of Brazilian legislators, acting via a Parliamentary Commission of Inquiry, has introduced 8 bills that, to state it directly, would give the Brazilian government sweeping powers to censor and control the Internet.
The EFF has a summary of what those bills propose: Allowing police warrantless access to IP addresses;

Requiring sites and apps to monitor content to prevent new sharing of materials already deemed offensive by court decision;

Criminalizing improper computer system access that presents a "risk of misuse or disclosure" of data, even if no actual misuse or disclosure occurs -- broad and vague terms that also apply to actions with no criminal intent, jeopardizing legitimate security research that might never be done if obtaining prior permission were a legal requirement;

Allowing judges, in direct violation of net neutrality rules, to block sites and applications that are used for criminal purposes or that don’t comply with demands for user information.
Clearly, if these bills pass in their present form, they will nullify many of the safeguards found in the Marco Civil. The key vote is expected to take place on April 27, and the EFF has a page where you can ask Brazilian lawmakers to reject the proposals. There is also a joint statement to the Brazilian congress, which companies active in the country are invited to sign.

Follow me @glynmoody on Twitter or identi.ca, and +glynmoody on Google+

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team

Filed Under: brazil, civil liberties, internet, internet freedom, marco civil

2 Comments

If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...

Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread

Anonymous Coward, 25 Apr 2016 @ 1:32pm

Freedom is under constant attack by tyrants. It's hard to keep fighting the good fight when victory is so difficult to achieve and so easy to lose.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Ninja (profile), 26 Apr 2016 @ 6:27am

The current situation is quite troubling from various points of view. The current president is no saint but the venue chosen to impeach her is just a soft coup d'etat as virtually all presidents since the end of the military government have done it without any punishment. In that area, the worst that can be said about her is that she is an incredibly incompetent administrator and politician. The venue I believe to be the most legitimate to take her out of her position is via TSE (Superior Electoral Court I'd translate to) because of violations in the electoral campaign. Not that the other parties are not guilty of it too but at least the court hasn't found any damning evidence for previous presidents. Getting her out serves a double purpose: the main one will probably be to pull the plug in the investigative efforts of the police and the other is to take the power. Even with the current president still on the job the vice is already articulating and the worst groups are trying to pass legislation that fits their own interests along with demanding the vice president to do their bidding when he takes over (it seems inevitable now).

It's pretty much like using terrorism to pass awful laws. Terrorism is the distraction. The trash in the politics here are taking the opportunity by generating chaos. And the Government along with the financial crisis gave them pretty much the ammunition they needed to generate the chaos.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]