Brazil Has To Pause Adoption Of Broadband Usage Caps After Consumers Revolt

from the pay-more-for-the-same-service! dept

It appears to have only taken the better part of the last decade, but we finally appear to be reaching the point where people have finally realized that broadband caps aren't about managing congestion, they're about turf protection. Here in the States, companies like Suddenlink, Comcast AT&T and CenturyLink have all rushed toward adopting caps and overage fees as not only a pointed weapon against streaming video competitors like Netflix, but as a nifty way to charge more money than ever for a product that's actually getting cheaper and cheaper to provide.

The same thing is happening in Brazil, where ISPs have convinced telecom regulator Anatel it's absolutely necessary to shift from flat-rate pricing to metered usage lest the Internet explodes (it's surely just coincidental that Netflix's popularity is soaring). And, like here in the States, regulators have been more than happy to help repeat broadband industry claims that you need low caps and overage fees because it's just not possible to continue offering unlimited broadband:
"...The president of the telecom watchdog Joao Resende told journalists at a press event yesterday that it is unlikely that Anatel will challenge operators, since "not all models can accommodate an unlimited service provision and also because the networks won't be able to cater for everybody." Resende added that operators are guilty for making users think that unlimited service provision would be available indefinitely.
The problem is that most consumers and press outlets are perfectly capable of reading earnings reports, and realize that flat-rate broadband has been perfectly sustainable, and that caps and overage fees are really just massive price hikes on uncompetitive markets:
"Companies argue that caps are needed to prevent network congestion, but continued investment in infrastructure to cope with forecast demand consistently announced by these same firms in recent years suggest that usage caps really have nothing to do with network congestion issues. In addition, bandwidth costs for telcos largely remain fixed, and despite major growth in their user base, providers such as Vivo are paying less today for raw bandwidth than they were a decade ago. So really, there is no technical or economic justification for a cap."
Anatel had been pondering regulation that would have codified this shift toward metered usage, but the unprecedented amount of public backlash appears to have the regulator re-thinking its agenda:
"According to Anatel, the decision to let service providers introduce the data limits has now been stalled due to the several complaints that were received, and will remain on hold until the proposals for the new plans have been submitted by operators and analyzed by the watchdog."
That doesn't mean Anatel won't ignore consumers anyway, but it does highlight how consumer activism and revolt can at the very least still give telecom regulators pause. Instead of letting ISPs wage war on innovative services with unnecessary usage caps, less beholden regulators have realized their focus should be on improving broadband competition, which in turn improves speeds (Akamai currently ranks Brazil 80th in overall broadband speed) but organically punishes neutrality violators and prevents carriers from being able to pummel captive markets with such glorified rate hikes.
Hide this

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team

Filed Under: anatel, brazil, broadband, data caps, usage caps


Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread


  • icon
    Whatever (profile), 4 May 2016 @ 4:29pm

    Brazil is pretty simple: This means that the broadband companies didn't pay a big enough bribe. Other than that, it means very little, because Brazil isn't about the people.

    link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      Anonymous Coward, 4 May 2016 @ 9:57pm

      Re:

      And your broadband companies are?

      link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      ryuugami, 5 May 2016 @ 4:41am

      Re:

      To be fair, the USA (and most other countries) is mostly the same.

      USA is pretty simple: This means that the broadband companies didn't give a big enough donation. Other than that, it means very little, because USA isn't about the people.

      (Also: not calling it a bribe doesn't mean it isn't.)

      link to this | view in chronology ]

    • icon
      John Fenderson (profile), 5 May 2016 @ 5:52am

      Re:

      So, pretty much like the US then.

      link to this | view in chronology ]

    • icon
      Ninja (profile), 5 May 2016 @ 7:54am

      Re:

      Sadly. But it's unfortunate that we are not alone. In fact it's pretty crowded there.

      link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    chilling farts, 4 May 2016 @ 5:57pm

    meanwhile in peru...

    US lobbyists (some Atlas NGO) and spanish lobbyists (Telefonica) are pushing the same restrictions in peru since 2010, but they reached some goals at 2014, when out single net neutrality rule was killed waiting to get replaced by (a more complicated) regulation in favor of ISP.

    No association are viewing this issue. Instead, the few NGO related to this issue are being fed with american taxes from NDI to shut up.

    link to this | view in chronology ]


Follow Techdirt
Essential Reading
Techdirt Deals
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Discord

The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...

Loading...
Recent Stories

This site, like most other sites on the web, uses cookies. For more information, see our privacy policy. Got it
Close

Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.