Judge In Child Porn Case Reverses Course, Says FBI Will Not Have To Turn Over Details On Its Hacking Tool
from the no-unending-solitary-confinement-for-special-agents,-apparently dept
Back in February, the judge presiding over the FBI's case against Jay Michaud ordered the agency to turn over information on the hacking tool it used to unmask Tor users who visited a seized child porn site. The FBI further solidified its status as a law unto itself by responding that it would not comply with the court's order, no matter what.
Unfortunately, we won't be seeing any FBI officials tossed into jail cells indefinitely for contempt of court charges. The judge in that case has reversed course, as Motherboard reports.
The government's motion has been granted, and the FBI does not have to provide the exploit code to the defense as previously ordered. That means that the defense in the case will probably be unable to examine how the evidence against their client was collected in the first place.The judge apparently believes the defense should still be able to examine the code but apparently can't be bothered with ensuring this will happen.
It is not totally clear why Judge Robert J. Bryan changed his mind. On Thursday, the government and Bryan held a private meeting, where the government presented its reasons for nondisclosure of the Tor Browser exploit.
Despite backtracking somewhat, Bryan still thinks the defense has a reason to see that code, according to audio of the public section of Thursday’s hearing provided by activist Phil Mocek. Of course, whether the FBI decides to then provide it is another matter.Given the FBI's earlier promise to withhold the details of the NIT despite being ordered to disclose them, I'd say there's about a 0% chance of the FBI voluntarily turning this information over to the defense. Right now, the agency is working overtime just trying to keep the evidence it obtained with its hacking tool from being tossed out of three other courts. It's also facing the prospect that third-party interlopers like Mozilla may still result in it having to release these details to someone outside of its own offices. At this point, hardly anything's going the FBI's way, so it will take whatever it can get, even if it's only temporary relief.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: discovery, doj, fbi, hacking, jay michaud, malware, nit, playpen
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
On Thursday, the government and Bryan held a private meeting, where the government presented its reasons for nondisclosure of the Tor Browser exploit.
The Defense wasn't allowed at this meeting? Seems a bit one-sided... why is this not allowed/illegal?
Look, give the FBI the option of showing the code, but add the stipulation that without sharing the code, all evidence is tossed. I'd rather the judge just throw some FBI guys in jail for contempt until the code is revealed, but tossing the evidence is a decent consolation prize.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
Men in Black suits and dark sunglasses had a "talk" with him.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re:
The agencies did learn some things over time and one is to act in a way that there aren't any questions.
Those kind of people while working with criminals know better than to act like them. His family is safe but people have accidents. Strokes are the #1 killer in the world...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Police state?
In this case, it's "evidence gathered by secret means", but is that significantly different to secret evidence? The government hacked into his computer using secret methods, how does anyone know that the files existed on the person's computer before the government hacked in?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Police state?
That said, if I were the FBI, I wouldn't have deployed a NIT like this; I'd just have deployed something that called home to an FBI-owned address in the clear -- a NIT that they would have no issues revealing as it doesn't do anything special. It would have given them the same probable cause that they got using the method they used, but without anything they'd need to hide.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
When facing a recalcitrant judge in the "good old days" the FBI could just dredge up some dirt and wave it in the official's face to make him more compliant. Or threaten to start a criminal investigation of some sort. But of course this was rarely even needed, as the FBI's fearsome reputation kept virtually all government officials cowering in fear.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Sounds Like
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
So a judge reverse course after a secret meeting
If not this sounds like a severe security flaw And I know where your children sleep. may become a mainstay maneuver of the legal system.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
But did not the king have you arrested immediately?
By whom? It was I who commanded the musketeers; he must have commanded me to convey myself to prison; I would never have consented: I would have resisted myself.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Wouldn't it make sense, then for the court to require that the code/software used to develop the evidence be provided at least to the court for review, if not to the defense for similar purpose?
And if the code/software isn't produced, does the prosecution have any right to proceed with the case?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
well yeah but....
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Conundrum solved
Hey, I know: "Case dismissed, with prejudice."
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
A citizen accused of wrongdoing dares to think they he should be able to see how the information was gathered to prove if it was legally gathered and is unable to do so.
So what if that is guaranteed on some old piece of paper, it is all just window dressing. Throw everything we allegedly stand for out the window, because protecting secrets trumps the law & truth.
Truth (as redacted), Justice (for some), & the 'Merica way... (allegations are all we need to prove them guilty, because we throw the book away because everything has to be secret.)
Dude might be a pedophile, but what the courts are allowing to happen is way worse.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
MIB, politics and a healthy dose of "won't someone think of the children!?".
Sure the dude's a sleazebag (and that's putting it mildly) but is it really worth pissing on due process (that will be abused) into law just to add another 5 years to a future inmate's sentence ?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Pissing on due process
And of course, now every poor shlub in the wrong place at the wrong time is bad enough.
And that makes all the rapists and sexual murderers (serial killers) into political prisoners, since due process is commonly circumvented for easy convictions.
The United States loves easy convictions.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Pissing on due process
Due process is not an impediment to justice.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Pissing on due process
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
secret courts
and now.. secret evidence
what in the fuck is happening
land of the free indeed
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Lot of that going round these days...
Should read:
Judge receives plain brown paper envelope full of pictures showing him and an obviously under-age boy, doing the dirty mamba, and a note that reads, "If your not with us, you're against us."
Judge gets the picture - reverses position on Fed's illegal Child Porn activity.
Can't think of a better example of Justice, American Style.
---
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Justice
secret courts
FBI ???
Ohh may good!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]