Russian Censor Bans Comodo... Doesn't Realize Its Own Security Certificate Is From Comodo
from the ow!-my-foot!-shot-it-right-off! dept
The Russian government's state censorship organization, Roskomnadzor (technically its telecom regulator) has been especially busy lately as the government has continued to crack down on websites it doesn't like. However, as pointed out by Fight Copyright Trolls, it appears that Roskomnadzor may have gone a bit overboard recently, in response to a court ruling that had a massive list of sites to be banned (over a thousand pages). Apparently, as part of that, various sites associated with Comodo were all banned. That's pretty bad for a variety of reasons, starting with the fact that Comodo remains one of the most popular issuers of secure certificates for HTTPS.In fact, as many quickly noted, Roskomnadzor's own website happens to be secured with a certificate from... Comodo:
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: ban list, censorship, https, roskomnadzor, russia, security certificate, ssl
Companies: comodo
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Pop quiz...
a) block the blocking of sites?
b) suddenly and drastically reduce the amount of Russian spam I receive?
c) suddenly and drastically increase the amount of russian spam I receive?
d) create some sort of block hole?
e) all of the above.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Ignorance is universal
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Oh, Shitski.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Ohuru: I can't get through...
Spock: They appear to be blocking our communications, captain.
Kirk: They're blocking our warning? That's really stupid blocking...
Checkov: Russia inwented really stupid blocking!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Spock: As I informed you earlier, There is No intelligent life down there.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
If the block list is blocked, won't they be unblocked?
At what point will they fire their Net Admins and hire some philosophers on ornithology?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: If the block list is blocked, won't they be unblocked?
A: ABC site is randomly offline WTF!
B: I cheeked the block list but there is nothing there!
C: You are both crazy, I checked the block list and ABC is blocked.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
No contact necessary?
On the one hand, contact with the issuing server is not necessary to continue using the certificate.
On the other hand, the issuing CA is also where the revocation issues from....
All this from a 10 minute Google search. Please correct me where appropriate.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: No contact necessary?
Yeah, that was my thought. Blocking Comodo has 2 effects:
1. Stops new sales by Comodo
2. Stops people downloading Comodo's list of revoked certificates.
Perhaps there is a certificate that Comodo has issued in error, but the Russians would like to continue using it?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: No contact necessary?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
The CRL Distribution point is not critical
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Putin: Ok LOL.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Trust Certificates, really?
It's because Comodo, like a LOT of other CA's have done their best to emulate the BBB, and sell Trust Certificates to most anyone with a phone and a credit card! Now, they find out (after the horse is out of the barn) that a LOT of those certs they sold went to: Russian Mafia, unknown government entities and more. Now, they want to 'revoke' them, and 'legitimately scrutinize' who's actually buying them. Layman's terms: OOPS!
So, before you think it's funny that these 'certificates' are revoked, or the CA is now black-listed, maybe, just maybe you need to understand that it doesn't take a 'little green padlock' in the URL bar to get someone to visit your site anymore than a 'little green padlock' missing will stop them.
You don't go to websites you don't mean to, and you default to trusting sites you go to without looking whether there is a padlock in that URL bar when you do. If money or personal ID aren't 'in-transit', few care, and fewer look.
Hey, I thought everyone wanted to be in the 'cloud' nowdays with their G-Strings showing? I thought everyone wanted to go 'no privacy', and that Google-NSA was a good thing, remember?
In reality, CA's are like ISO certification for manufacturing. In reality, it doesn't make a better product, it makes a mediocre product cost more, and in most instances, bankrupts smaller companies in the end. Same with CA's - it's a scam to start with.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Trust Certificates, really?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
android
[ link to this | view in chronology ]