MIT Media Lab Launched Disobedience Award, Funded By Reid Hoffman
from the this-is-cool dept
Last week, Joi Ito, director of the MIT Media Lab (and a very sharp thinker on a variety of topics related to innovation) announced a really cool new award that the lab was putting together: a Rewarding Disobedience award, for $250,000, funded by LinkedIn founder Reid Hoffman:This prize is a one-time experiment that, if successful, we will consider repeating in the future. It will go to a person or group engaged in what we believe is excellent disobedience for the benefit of society. The disobedience that we would like to call out is the kind that seeks to change society in a positive way, and is consistent with a set of key principles. The principles include non-violence, creativity, courage, and taking responsibility for one’s actions. The disobedience can be in — but is not limited to — the fields of scientific research, civil rights, freedom of speech, human rights, and the freedom to innovate.That's a pretty cool idea for a prize. And I particularly like Michael Petricone's suggestion that the award should be named after Aaron Swartz, who of course was engaged in a great number of civil disobedience projects. And, unfortunately, one of them involved MIT turning on him, leading him to getting arrested and charged with a variety of ridiculous charges. Since then, there has been a struggle among many at MIT to figure out how that happened and what the university should do to prevent similar things in the future. Naming this kind of award after him would be a great start.
We recently wrote about the book The Idealist, about Swartz and the world of free culture (and had the author, Justin Peters, appear on our podcast for an excellent two-part discussion about the book). One things that becomes clear from the book was the absolute disbelief by Swartz and his family of the fact that MIT refused to support Swartz after his arrest. The university basically turned its back on him completely. It's something that the university still ought to do something about, and naming this award after Swartz would be a step in the right direction.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: aaron swartz, innovation, joi ito, mit media lab, reid hoffman
Companies: mit
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Ed Snowden
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Ed Snowden
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
http://www.cnn.com/2016/06/10/politics/pam-bondi-donald-trump-donation/
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
The Irony:
And yet whistleblowing is probably going to be one of the activities recognized by this Disobedience Award, owing to the typical extralegal harassment and prosecution of whistleblowers that's trendy today.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: The Irony:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Given the above, it seems MIT would never have given this award to Swartz, so it would be inappropriate to name it for him, unless perhaps they append the word Memorial to his name.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Protecting 1%
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Protecting 1%
Given that judges commonly intimidate juries as to how they should ONLY view the evidence in light of the law, and very few will now dissent from a badly written law, juries are pretty much neutered.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
LinkedIn is Fucked
That scumbag bunch raids my friend's email account and sends me spam saying he has invited me to join linkedin. They get sued for this practice, and then continue to do it. I'm in society and I reap no benefit from their scummy tactics. Hoffman you are a dickhead.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]