Clinton Friend, Virginia Governor Terry McAuliffe, Now Pretends Hillary Never Supported TPP
from the that's-just-wrong dept
The whole silliness around Hillary Clinton and the Trans Pacific Partnership (TPP) agreement just keeps getting sillier. She should admit what pretty much everyone already recognizes: she supports the deal. She could then explain why she supports it and perhaps the public could have an honest and open conversation about the nature of these agreements. As we've noted more than once, we tend to support free trade here at Techdirt, but the TPP agreement is barely about free trade. It's mostly about investment and creating other regulatory/protectionist barriers. But Clinton's constant flip flopping on the issue is silly. Back in 2012, she declared the TPP to be "the gold standard" in trade agreements. It was only last fall, after she started facing primary pressure from Bernie Sanders, who was against the agreement, that she flip flopped and said:“As of today, I am not in favor of what I have learned about it,” Clinton said, later adding, “I don’t believe it’s going to meet the high bar I have set.”It got so ridiculous that Clinton deleted the section of her memoir where she talks about her support of the TPP. That's just literally trying to rewrite history.
Meanwhile, pretty much everyone has assumed that after the election, she'd flip flop right back into supporting the TPP. Back in February, the head of the US Chamber of Commerce, Tom Donohue, made it clear that he fully expected she'd flip back, and this week a US Chamber of Commerce employee who spoke at the Democratic Convention (officially as a member of "Republican Women for Hillary") has also said she expects Hillary to flip back and support the agreement.
But, of course the bigger headlines came when the Clintons' close family friend and advisor, current Virginia governor Terry McAuliffe, admitted that he fully expected she'd support the TPP after the election. As we noted, this resulted in a bunch of other Clinton supporters to scream loudly about how this was crazy and Hillary was never going to support TPP. Apparently the message got back to McAuliffe, who when approached at a bar late at night by a Gawker reporter now claims not only that Hillary will never support the agreement, but that she never did in the past either.
She’s wrong. I support it. She doesn’t. She never supported it. I create jobs in Virginia, I always supported it. We’re best friends. She has never supported it.Except, of course, she has supported it, quite clearly in the past. And almost certainly still is. I understand the political calculations here. Historically, Democrats (especially the progressive wing) have generally been against free trade. So these agreements (even when they're actually good!) are usually a tough sell to Democratic voters. But this is a weird year. Because while these agreements have almost universally been supported by Republicans, this year Donald Trump suddenly hates them -- not for all the legitimate reasons to hate them, but mainly because he doesn't understand how international trade works.
But wouldn't it be nice if Clinton could just come out and say what she really thought about the TPP and have an open conversation about it, rather than playing this "wink wink nod nod" game where basically everyone knows her true position, but she won't say it?
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: hillary clinton, politics, terry mcauliffe, tpp, trade agreements
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Its toxic
Im not sure which should be believed or what her actual stance on it is.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Its toxic
So, in my opinion, the safest thing is to assume that Clinton's real position now is exactly what it was before she started campaigning: she's very much in favor of the terms of the TPP.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Its toxic
What amazes me is that this shows how undemocratic our nation really is. The TPP and expanded IP laws are not what the people want, the fact that politicians oppose it during elections evidences this, yet we still managed to have them push for laws that no one wants during non-election periods.
If, as the shills here would have us believe, IP and TPP critics are only a small vocal minority then surely politicians would have no problems supporting such measures during elections. A small vocal minority isn't enough to sway an election, am I right? Unless these measures are being done against the will of a large majority ...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Between the two candidates
And finally, finally, people are aware how bad an idea the TPP is.
But the previous president already signed it. It only needs to be ratified by legislature. I don't know if she can unsign it.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Between the two candidates
What Clinton could do is put the same amount of effort to undo TPP as Obama did to pass it.
By not removing bad laws any group of politicians currently in place are supporting and hence should be presumed in favor of those bad laws.
Our current Congress, by not making the effort necessary to correct overreaching IP laws (ie: copy protection lengths and the one sided penalty structure) are supporting and hence should be presumed to be in favor of those bad laws.
Our international diplomats, by not doing what's necessary to remove TPP, are actively supporting it and hence should be considered in favor of it. This includes Hilary Clinton once elected president.
There is no excuse for keeping existing bad laws on the books. Politicians are great at putting them there and keeping them there is just as bad an act as putting them there in the first place. The politicians responsible for maintaining bad laws are just as guilty as the ones responsible for putting them there in the first place. No excuses.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Between the two candidates
I don't want to vote for the politician that's going to claim that they can't do anything about existing bad laws. I want to vote for the politician that's going to actively seek to remove every existing bad law that's already in place. I want to vote for the politician that's going to make every effort to do so. A politician that doesn't do this is just as bad as the politicians responsible for enacting these bad laws in the first place. They're useless and are allowing these bad laws to continue. The end result is the same, we're (still) being subject to these bad laws, no different than with the politician responsible for enacting these bad laws to begin with.
If you aren't actively against existing bad laws and aren't basing your campaign on removing them you should lose your votes.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Between the three candidates
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Its toxic
The problem is that once she gets elected her 'solution' would be to 'fix' what's wrong with the treaty or to introduce a similar treaty. She doesn't get it (or, more likely, she dishonestly pretends not to get it). People aren't in favor of a superficial 'fix'. They're not in favor of a superficially different treaty to take its place. They're against the treaty altogether. They're against corporate sovereignty, they're against fast track, and they're against expanding and extending IP laws past their already ridiculous corporate bought state. They're against the secrecy behind the treaty with only corporate interests invited until the last minute when it's too late to do much about it. They're against corporations buying laws. But Hillary will pretend not to get it once elected instead opting to superficially 'fix' what's wrong with the treaty so that she can then claim that she kept her promise to voters during the elections by fixing what voters were concerned about with the treaty when everyone knows that's not true.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Its toxic
It's not so amazing, really. As far as trustworthiness goes, the opposition is no better.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Its toxic
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
I honestly don't think Trump knows how anything works from just simple business to anything in government. When he speaks he just sounds like a blathering idiot about even the most basic of things and when he says anything about real issues like trade or foreign affairs he's just downright scary.
Hillary is by no means a genius either, she just goes whatever way her corporate overlords pay her to go, like with the TPP, but at least she has some knowledge of how things really work so usually she doesn't sound like a complete idiot.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
When did the TPP go public?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: When did the TPP go public?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
TPP
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: TPP
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
I Support the TPP
Yours Truly,
Ollie Oligarch
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Sure:
"I'm Hilary and I'm a corrupt, bloodthirsty neocon. I believe in perpetual war and policy auctions. I am happy to take money from the worst people on the planet."
Can see that working out well for her.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Yes, it would certainly be refreshing if Hillary Clinton would stop lying through her damn teeth about everything while those who secretly support her would stop reportraying these offenses as if they were "silly mishaps".
THEY'RE CONTEMPTIBLE BALD-FACED LIES, FROM A CONTEMPTIBLE PIECE OF FILTH.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
The problem with a negative campain
Isn't Pence an avid TPP supporter? I suspect he'd be making the decision.
We're stuck in a campaign where we have to choose between people we don't want for president. We have to consider who we want in office less and then vote the other one in.
At some point we'll want to start looking two to four years ahead to prevent the same thing from happening then where all the affirmative options suck.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
ffs.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Wht an ego...
Oh yea, the whole TPP is about whether it meets her personal standards. Well we already know a lot about how low that bar really is.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]