Pokemon Go The Latest Tool For Russian Government To Silence Speakers It Doesn't Like
from the putin-me-on dept
On the list of countries I've always wanted to visit but would be somewhat scared if I did, Russia is probably near the top. While there are certainly more dangerous parts of the world for any variety of reasons, I've found that the thing that gets me in the most trouble is my big mouth -- and the Russian government has made a habit of coming down on any kind of speech it doesn't like with a hand heavier than a Russian bear. This government uses its own laws in perverse ways to accomplish this, notably its laws that make it illegal to offend others on religious grounds, as seen chiefly in its treatment of punk band Pussy Riot.
This use of religious protectionism has proceeded to the present. The Russian government recently announced that it was locking up a noted atheist blogger for two months. His crime? Playing Pokemon Go in a church.
On Saturday, Russian officials announced that atheist vlogger Ruslan Sokolovsky has been detained for two months for “inciting hatred” and “insulting religious feelings” after posting a video of himself playing Pokémon Go inside a historic cathedral. He reportedly faces up to five years in jail if convicted.
Now, the sensible amongst you are surely wondering how simply playing a mobile game in a church rises to the level of inciting hatred or insulting religious feelings. It doesn't, generally, and even those benefiting from the actions of the Russian government admit as much in their forward justification of the Russian government's heavy-handed action.
According to Meduza, police began investigating Sokolovsky soon after, finally detaining the 22-year-old vlogger this weekend. In a statement, Russian Orthodox Church spokesman Vladimir Legoyda claimed it was the provocative nature of Sokolovsky’s video—and not playing the game itself—that led to his arrest.
“It is clear that Mr. Sokolovsky was not a casual passerby, who in a fit of gaming passion went into the temple, but rather a well-known young blogger in the city, who works in the style of Charlie Hebdo,” wrote Vladimir Legoyda on Facebook.
In other words, it wasn't the game that made Sokolovsky a target; it was who he was and what he's said. Not content to keep its religious citizenry from having to endure direct confrontational speech, instead the government has decided that indirect speech that it doesn't like, in this case posted on social media, is fair game under the law as well. And, while Sokolovsky knowingly flouted the law as a protest, that should be terrifying to anyone who holds free speech as an ideal, because now this government is suggesting that it can jail people for speech it decides is offensive, even when the speech wasn't directed at the supposedly offended.
And that's an open license for a government to simply lock up anyone it wants. While we rightly point out when western governments get questions of free speech incorrect, and they do, it's helpful to remember there are places where it's much, much worse.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: censorship, free speech, pokemon go, russia
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
"Much Worse"
We'll catch up soon enough.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
And the church says?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Authoritarians and Pokemon
More seriously, I remember my mother telling me many years ago (in my Pokemon-obsessed childhood years), as a way of weaning me off of that obsession, that Turkey had banned Pokemon because kids were jumping off of buildings in imitation of their favorite Pokemon types flying (or whatever). Even then, I sensed something didn't add up with that story, and much more recently, I've read that it was a story invented by the Turkish government to hide the fact that they were doing it because they felt it was somehow subversive. It makes me wonder what element of subversion was involved in Pokemon then, and also why few media outlets reporting this at that time seemed to catch on to Turkey's increasingly authoritarian behaviors.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: "Much Worse"
The left has been working hard on it. You can circulate petitions on college campuses to repeal the 1st and get far more support than you would think possible.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: "Much Worse"
The benevolent leaders on the conservative side would never do anything to hurt those less fortunate than themselves and would never put profit before society.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: And the church says?
It's like all manners and brains go out the window playing this dumb game. It's one thing going to a park, but it's another doing it in a Church, or someone's Backyard, and other dumb places.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
OK, quick show of hands here. How many people are old enough to remember when such a headline would have been impossible?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
The church should be standing up for freedom and for the right for any person to visit a church.
When the church rules become part of the law of the state its bad news for the rights of any citizen whether
you are a religious person or not.
And many people in russia have been sent to prison or discriminated against
for being jewish or catholic before putin came to
power .
[ link to this | view in thread ]
First sentence in the article
And for those of us who've actually visited Russia (whilst it was still the USSR, as a matter of fact), consider that the US is also 'near the top' of the list. (for very small distances of 'near')
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
Trespassing could be charged if the perp refused to leave when asked to do so, or was there after hours. What other offenses might be thrown at the perp? Jail time?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: First sentence in the article
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Atheists Complaining about the State
Americans trying to comment on what is going on in either Europe or Russia without realizing these things do a lot of damage to the truth.
An atheist playing Pokemon in church might well be offensive to religious people, especially an outspoken atheist who openly mocks their beliefs. Pussy Riot... well... Look at their name.
I'm sorry, but in an age where you all have decided that Christians need to be ashamed of opposing infanticide and the abandonment of children to wildly inappropriate sexual practices, it is very, very difficult for me to be upset that Russia is supporting its state church in much the same fashion that you are supporting yours - State Sponsored Atheism.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Atheists Complaining about the State
On a side note, there are assholes in every crowd. Do not attempt to use one of them to smear the entire group because that makes you an asshole.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]