Surprise: Now Even Australia's Biggest Business Organization Says It Has Doubts About TPP
from the anyone-still-support-it?-anyone??? dept
As Techdirt has reported, the few studies into the economic impact of TPP that exist show that there is likely to be vanishingly small benefit for most countries. The Australian Council of Trade Unions, representing 1.6 million workers in Australia, is not impressed with the deal, and has just called for TPP to be rejected, according to the Guardian:
"The TPP puts globalisation before Australian workers, threatens the fundamentals of our democracy and drives up health costs," [ACTU’s director of policy] Tkalcevic said. "By destroying thousands of Australian jobs and driving down wages we believe the TPP will lead to higher levels of inequality.
It would be easy to dismiss this as typical left-wing anti-big business rhetoric. But the same could hardly be said about the following:
The TPP is a toxic combination of more power to multinationals ahead of democracy and globalisation ahead of Australian workers."Australia's biggest business organisation has distanced itself from claims the proposed Trans Pacific Partnership will create hundreds of thousands of jobs and be a "gigantic foundation stone" for Australia's future.
As The Sydney Morning Herald reports, when the Australian Chamber of Commerce and Industry (ACCI) spoke before a Parliamentary commission, it was particularly critical about the nature of the TPP deal, and the lack of in-depth, independent economic analysis:
ACCI argued the agreement did not mandate free trade and had not been assessed by an independent authority such as the Productivity Commission.
The business organization also criticized the opacity of the trade negotiations:
"With the exception of some relatively superficial information on the Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade website, it is difficult to know the detail of what is being negotiated in our national interest," [ACCI's director of trade] Mr Clark said.
It even went so far as to worry about "regulatory chill":
the chamber wanted the inquiry to note that the deal would "further complicate compliance and costs for business" and had not been subjected to an independent Australian economic analysis.
When a country's top business association offers criticism in more or less the same terms as anti-TPP activists, maybe it's time to think twice about ratifying a deal that still lacks any credible justification.
It should also be concerned about the potential for "regulatory chill" from the clauses that would prevent further liberalisation of Australia's intellectual property and labour laws after it had been ratified.
Follow me @glynmoody on Twitter or identi.ca, and +glynmoody on Google+
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: australia, business, tpp, trade
Companies: acci, australian chamber of commerce and industry
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
nope don't believe it
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: nope don't believe it
Fuck that noise.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: nope don't believe it
"So why are you still fighting?" ~ me
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
IP 'liberalisation'
How did the word 'further' get in there? There hasn't been any liberalisation of Australia's IP or labour laws in recent times, with IP laws in particular being tightened up as a result of AUSFTA (Australia - US Free Trade Agreement).
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
This article is really unclear; it begins with something irrelevant to the title and then jumps to a completely different entity.
The ACTU is a worker's union. It has nothing to do with business councils or anything else. I don't even know why TechDirt bothered including it. For reference though, the media release is at: http://www.actu.org.au/actu-media/media-releases/2016/government-must-back-away-from-tpp-or-risk -39-000-local-jobs
The ACCI is the "business organisation."
Please update the article to make it clearer.
Not that the distinguishment really matters. The Australian government won't be listening to the ACTU, the ACCI or anything else that doesn't agree with its mandate.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Clarity
Other than by the name of Anonymous Coward.
Oops. Sorry.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]