Israeli Lawmakers Pushing Mandatory, Default ISP Porn Filtering Because That Always Works So Well
from the perverts:-please-sign-here dept
It looks like Israel wants to take a UK-esque approach to internet porn. The Israeli government is considering mandating site blocking at the ISP level, rather than allowing end users to make their own decisions, as Quartz's Anaya Bhattacharya reports:
On Oct. 30, the Ministerial Committee for Legislation unanimously green-lit a bill that would force internet companies to censor pornography by default. The committee approved the measure in a bid to clamp down on rampant underage access to adult content online, the Times of Israel reported.
"Rampant underage access." That's a hell of a phrase. I wonder if the Israeli government has any stats to back up this assertion. The underlying reporting at the Times of Israel is less than illuminating. The same goes for the reporting at Haaretz, although this one does have a rather useless analogy delivered by a legislator.
“The damaging influence of watching, and addiction to, pornographic and severe violence has been proven in many studies, with great harm to children. Today, it is easier for a child to consume harsh content on the internet than to buy an ice cream at the local kiosk,” said Moalem-Refaeli. “We must prevent such access by making the default of the internet provider to filter such content, unless the customer has asked to be exposed to it,” she added.
So, because internet porn is easier to access than ice cream, ISPs may be forced to stop allowing ice cream to flow uninterrupted through its lines unless customers of age specifically ask to be "exposed to" ice cream. If customers want porn to burst from every digital orifice connected to their ISP, they would need to opt-in via phone call, letter, or through the ISP's website.
Other people, who would just like to have their access to websites less effed up will also have to do the same, considering website filtering/blocking is far from perfect and tends to net a bunch of false positives. Critics of the bill only have to point to all the other times this has happened to provide examples of why this is a bad idea.
In addition, a list of opt-in users would be created because there's no way an opt-in "service" doesn't. I can't imagine why the government might be interested in the contents of such a list, but the fact that it's there means it could be obtained without too much paperwork if "needed." Then there are other outside forces, like malicious hackers, who might find it entertaining to plaster lists of "porn, please!" users all over the internet.
Less damaging to internet users' privacy would be a more voluntary system that allows users to request porn filtering and site blocking, rather than make this the default. But all of these issues are ignored when legislators engage in "for the children" legislation. Simple niceties like an open internet and user privacy are no match for impassioned pleas for all the ice cream-eating 8-year-olds of [insert nation here].
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: internet, israel, mandatory porn filters, porn, porn filters
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
http://www.haaretz.com/israel-news/1.750211
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
You joke, but most parents tend to have a system set up whereby the kid has to ask their parents for ice cream, and the parent makes a decision as to whether that's allowed. With the internet, too many of them use the internet as an unmonitored babysitting system from another room, so they can access anything without asking.
"Less damaging to internet users' privacy would be"
...a system where parents actually used the facilities already available to them to stop their kids from accessing porn, so that the rights of adults are not infringed as an alternative?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Apparently, the ice cream kiosks need a better user interface. If kids can manage to go online and find porn but are unable to go buy an ice cream, I have to wonder why the ice cream vendors are doing such a poor job of making their point of sale easy to manage.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
So, because some parents are too lazy/ignorant/busy to bother parenting, the entire country has to be treated like children, damn the consequences.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Side note: In Judaism, parents are responsible for their children (in every way) until they are adults (at 13).
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Amazing
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Hmm
*Citations needed.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Rather than believe that their constituents have such a "basic moral failing", it must be due to other influences. So we must protect them from that which they don't want protection from. It doesn't matter what country, many of the politicians have the same problem. They refuse to believe that their people might like something that they themselves consider immoral.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Common Sense
> wonder if the Israeli government has any stats to back up
> this assertion.
It's pretty much common sense. I remember what it was like being a pre-teen boy. We were always trying to sneak looks at dad's Playboy stash or descramble Cinemax After Dark. It's just what boys (and girls, also) do.
Given the ease with which anyone can access porn on the net, it's absurd to think hormone-driven kids aren't going after it with gusto.
Not that I support government censorship, but let's be realistic here.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Common Sense
"Kids like porn, so too many kids must be watching porn"
doesn't take into account either the current checks that prevent access nor any of the proposed checks.
The "common sense" assertion has already been used to justify several freedom sacrifices, and since it isn't evidence based at all, we have no idea if they make any difference or not.
"Kids like porn, so too many kids must be watching porn" would apply equally before this block is in place as it would after the block is in place
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Common Sense
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
I have the perfect solution. I'll be giving your kids free ice cream.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
The Only True Democracy In The Middle East
Sometimes we in teh USA can learn a lot from other cuntries.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
That's a hell of a phrase. I wonder if the Israeli government has any stats to back up this assertion.
I would take it a step further and add another assertion: that exposure to porn causes harm.
Has anyone defined the harm? Has anyone show an increase is such harm that correlates with increasing internet use since it was created (This assumes that a fair percent of internet use involves porn).
Then, one would have to tease out causation, because correlation isn't enough.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Answer to porn
[ link to this | view in chronology ]