Techdirt Podcast Episode 99: Debating The Facebook Filter Bubble, With Mathew Ingram
from the bubble-bursting dept
Though the notion of the Facebook "filter bubble" has been around for a while, it's picked up a huge amount of steam following the election of Donald Trump — perhaps just a little too much steam. While Techdirt has long been of the opinion that pointing fingers at Facebook is misguided, there are plenty of people who disagree. This week, we're joined by one such person — long-time media commentator and senior editor at Fortune Mathew Ingram — for a lively debate about just how much of a problem the filter bubble really is, and how you'd go about solving it.
Follow the Techdirt Podcast on Soundcloud, subscribe via iTunes or Google Play, or grab the RSS feed. You can also keep up with all the latest episodes right here on Techdirt.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: fake news, filter bubble, politics
Companies: facebook
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
I think in a way seeing these things TWICE really validates these insane(?) ideas.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
In my view, Facebook's news feed analogous to the magazine stand of the past. It aggregates and makes available many different news sources with various points of view and levels of trustworthiness. Faux journalism like tabloids have been around for ages, right next to more authoritative news outlets, and usually consumers can discern the difference.
But now imagine the person behind the newsstand subtly curates the titles on the rack based on what _they think_ you might want to read. Of course this would have happened in the past at the newsstand as well - but the old newsstand pandered to its _average reader_, while Facebook panders to the _individual_. That is a fundamental change from the old newsstand, and leads to an over-representation of extreme viewpoints, and a false suppression of contradictory points of view.
Facebook could address this issue by giving its users the power to adjust the news filter algorithm for themselves. Then its users would knowingly and voluntarily choose to live in a bubble - or not.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
The only thing that can be done is to teach the current generation of children critical thinking skills and to make sure they understand the internet is not void of the necessary practice.
This is a consequence to having a stupid public and is a great example on why proper education from birth on up is needed for a free society to function correctly.
[ link to this | view in thread ]