Ross Ulbricht's Lawyers Uncover Evidence Showing His Silk Road Account Was Accessed While He Was Imprisoned
from the TWISTS-FOR-THE-TWIST-GOD dept
The government's Silk Road prosecution is the gift that keeps on giving. On its way to a life without parole sentence for the man behind the dark web drug marketplace, nearly everything that possibly could have happened actually happened.
As more evidence flowed in, more dirt on both sides of the prosecution was uncovered. The government appeared to engage in parallel construction to cover up evidence likely obtained by the NSA. (But the only reason for the coverup would be to protect the NSA's "means and methods," not to provide some sort of Fourth Amendment sanitizing. The Silk Road server was located in Iceland, somewhere the NSA could have performed an interception without troubling its domestic restrictions.)
It also emerged that government investigators had engaged in plenty of illegal activities of their own, including stealing Bitcoin, freezing accounts, and setting up a sting operation designed to rope Ross Ulbricht into hiring someone to kill a thieving employee… apparently set up by the same DEA agent engaged in the theft.
Also uncovered during the trial was the fact that the government had paid Carnegie Mellon researchers to develop a method to de-anonymize Tor users.
Now, there's this, reported by Jason Koebler of Motherboard:
Attorneys for Ross Ulbricht, the man convicted of running the Silk Road online drug marketplace under the pseudonym “Dread Pirate Roberts” say they’ve discovered evidence that someone logged into the Dread Pirate Roberts account on the Silk Road forums six weeks after Ulbricht was arrested. Ulbricht was in federal custody at the time.
[...]
Ulbricht was arrested on October 2, 2013. The Silk Road marketplace was taken down that same day, but the forums stayed up until November 22. His attorneys say that someone logged into the DPR account on the forum November 18.
These new details were uncovered by forensic analysts who studied backups of the Silk Road forums that were entered as evidence by the government during Ulbricht’s first trial. Ulbricht’s attorneys Dratel and Lindsay Lewis say that government tampering calls into question the evidence used to convict Ulbricht.
This could mean a few things. One possibility is that law enforcement agents continued to operate and access DPR's account after the investigation had concluded. Or it may point to one of Ulbricht's original defenses: that someone else actually ran Silk Road. It may be that Silk Road was run by multiple people, but the government was only able to track down Ulbricht.
Ulbricht's attorney seems to believe it's the last possibility on that list:
It’s unknown whether other Silk Road administrators had the username and password for the DPR account, whether there actually were other “real” DPRs, or whether government officials were somehow able to get the DPR login credentials.
“They had access only to Ross’s laptop,” Lewis told me. “I don’t think they had access to the login credentials.”
It could very well be that the government believes there were multiple DPRs, but felt that one DPR was more than enough for the purposes of prosecution. If so, its handling of this case echoes that of journalist Matthew Keys, who the government hung out to dry over 40 minutes of website defacement performed by someone else. Zero effort has been made to punish those who actually participated in the small-scale hacking of the LA Times website. The government seemed more than satisfied to let Keys carry all of this weight on his own.
This new information doesn't make the government's case look any more solid. Plenty of government deception and misconduct was uncovered during the trial and yet it was still able to obtain a life without parole sentence for Ulbricht and a $184 million fine. Now it looks like the government may have rung up the wrong Silk Road mastermind… or more likely, only one of them. The best case scenario for the government is that it was one of its own logging in and looking around, although it will still have to explain how it got ahold of Ulbricht's login info.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: dpr, ross ulbricht, silk road
Companies: silk road
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Or....
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Or....
Juror's lack the intelligence because the system actively selects the dumbest and most ignorant jurors possible. People are more worried about who they are voting for as president than stopping real corruption.
The people already know that the government lies, they do nothing.
Every nation gets the government it deserves.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Or....
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Or....
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Life sentence
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Life sentence
The problem is that if the government has the login credentials there it creates a large amount of doubt about who controlled the account, Mr. Ulbricht or the government.
And the problem with taht is that the words on that forum the government used to convict him with... could easily have come from the government themselves.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Life sentence
Even convicted rapists and murderers sometimes get off with less.
But maybe that's just me.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Life sentence
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Life sentence
"Whatever it was", huh? So, he deserves a life sentence regardless of what he did or didn't do. I see.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Life sentence
Well, there's the problem. You don't know what he did, but you're sure that the law demands that he spend the rest of his life in jail regardless...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Quick question!
If it were just a drop-in, then it might be police after all, but if whoever accessed the account actually did stuff, then that's pretty damning for the prosecution.
...Unless, you know, Ross gave his username and password to a trusted someone to manage things for him in case he was ever arrested.
That actually sounds like the most likely thing to me, given my poor knowledge of this case.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Not like there is no precedent for that at all! If the government is willing to upgrade and operate a child pornography website I'm sure they would have no problems operating a drug market.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Ross Ulbricht is more than likely still guilty and justice needs to be carried out (fair and blind justice, not whatever kind of Justice® brand justice the government serves up these days) but the DOJ, DEA, NSA, FBI and every other 3 letter agency has EARNED every bit of distrust they get these days. They should never be given the benefit of the doubt because they always seem to be hiding something dishonest.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
How is that the trial Judge who heard this case doesn't believe that the goverment and the Law Enforcement agencies who worked on the case and gathered the evidence used to prosecute Ulbricht can honestly say that this case wasn't tainted and that the evidence isn't questionable?
This case was and is a fucking mess. You have corrupt Law Enforcement agents who used their knowledge and how this case was being investigated to commit crimes in which they were prosecuted for and more and more details seem to show that the evidence gathered is questionable due to all the misconduct going on while the investigation was ongoing.
I am no way a fan of Ulbricht's what he was doing was more than criminal and is in no way innocent, but the illegal shit that has gone on in his case is by agents connected to the case is more than enough to raise serious questions about the evidence used to prosecute him and Ulbricht deserves to have an appeal heard and let the appellate court have the details of what has transpired with Agents being prosecuted and the unanswered questions as to how the evidence against Ulbricht shouldn't be tossed considering the revelations that have been brought to light the last while.
The whole case is honestly in the toilet and for the courts to let Ulbricht's conviction stand as more and more questionable details and illegal conduct by law enforcement comes is a travesty.
Does Ulbricht deserve to be punished for the illegal activities that he helped foster at Silk Road, yes he does, but not with the evidence and due to the illegal conduct conducted in the course of the investigation by agents involved with the case.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Unless he was using a credential manager like in Firefox.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
i.e., "perjury"
"It's okay if we're the ones doing it."
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
sorry don't agree
The federal government tried the owner of the infrastructure for the crimes committed by the users of the infrastructure.
There was definite entrapment going on. and the charge for the supposed contract killing was dropped.
The punishment seems also to fall under 8th Amendment interdictions.
Amendment VIII
Excessive bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted.
Ridiculous sentences for crimes involving computers are more the norm than the exception. Probably because 1. law enforcement is given a blank check to do whatever in the "war on drugs", and 2. because judges are too stupid to understand computer technology, so they are afraid of it. And when you add fear to lack of understanding you get witch trials.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
25 yrs is not great, especially seeing as there's so much doubt regarding the extent of his involvement (let alone the actual damage done by it), but it's something. If he's just got a standard sentence, he could be out by the time he's in his 50s right?
I hope so, anyway... better still would be a retrial.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]