AT&T's Downright Giddy About Weaker FCC Oversight And The Looming Death Of Net Neutrality
from the who-doesn't-like-zero-accountability? dept
AT&T is pretty damn excited about former Verizon lawyer Ajit Pai, Trump's new industry-cozy pick to head the FCC. That's in large part because Pai has made it clear his goal isn't just to gut net neutrality, new broadband privacy rules and most of the other consumer protections pushed by former FCC boss and and former dingo Tom Wheeler -- but to help dismantle the agency's role as consumer watchdog entirely. Of course, AT&T put things a little differently in a blog post applauding the selection:
"Today, on his first official day in office, President Trump designated Ajit Pai as the new FCC Chairman. No one is more prepared to reframe the agency to address the needs of this rapidly changing marketplace. Chairman Pai will work with his fellow Commissioners to quickly and decisively put back in place the commonsense regulatory framework necessary to support the President’s agenda for job creation, innovation and investment."
Anybody who actually believes this has simply not been paying attention to Pai's tenure at the agency, during which he consistently refused to stand up to large ISPs in absolutely any capacity. That includes downvotes on numerous attempts to hold AT&T accountable for outright fraud, whether it was the time AT&T was caught actively making its bills more confusing to help make it easier for crammers and scammers, the time AT&T was caught ripping off a program designed to help low income families, or that time AT&T was busted for turning a blind eye to drug dealers running directory assistance scams on AT&T customers.
So sure. AT&T's pretty excited about the fact it's potentially facing little to no accountability for what's a well-documented history of anti-competitive behavior and fraudulent activity. But it's also just thrilled by the idea that net neutrality rules could soon be sent to the digital dustbin of history, allowing AT&T to, in its own words, "go hard" on this whole zero rating thing:
"With a new operator-friendly FCC chairman in place, AT&T CEO Randall Stephenson said to expect the operator to “go hard” with its controversial “zero rating” strategy for its virtual MVPD service, DirecTV Now.
“Our customers are loving this value proposition,” Stephenson said during AT&T’s fourth quarter earnings call Wednesday. “We have more than 200,000 DirecTV Now customers on it, the service is not counting against their data cap, and that’s a big deal."
Except the "value proposition" AT&T's presenting isn't much of a value at all. Sure, some consumers labor under the illusion they're getting "free stuff" because AT&T's graciously letting them stream AT&T's content without running afoul of its arbitrary usage caps. But in reality, AT&T's preferential treatment of its own content simply repositions the cost burden to competing services while distorting the overall competitive market. You know, like the outgoing FCC told AT&T when it sheepishly and belatedly told the company it was violating net neutrality and acting anticompetitively just a few weeks and a universe ago.
Moving forward, the name of the game for AT&T will be to play kissy face with the new administration in the hopes of blind, blanket deregulation, some lovely tax cuts, additional unaccountable subsidies (these telcos have received billions over the years for networks either barely or half-deployed), and approval for the company's $100 billion acquisition of Time Warner:
"I got to tell you, I was impressed,” Stephenson said (after meeting Donald Trump). “It was obvious I was meeting with a CEO. He has a very clear agenda—tax reform and regulatory reform. I can tell you that he’s focused on these things. And I left with a degree of optimism that this could be pulled off this year."
Describing himself as a “supply-side guy,” Stephenson added that “If you saw tax rates move to 20-25%, we know what we would do. We would step up our investment rate."
In regards to deregulation, he added, “Nobody thinks that regulations should go away. We all believe the customer needs protection. But the problem is that we’ve had regulation that’s unpredictable, and it’s interfering with how we’re designing products, how we enter markets."
AT&T's a master in promising broadband deployment it never actually delivers in exchange for regulatory favors and government handouts, and has been doing it for decades without much fact-checking from the media. AT&T's also incredibly good at bullshitting the press and public into falsely believing that massive telecom megamergers actually create jobs, despite thirty years of documentable history proving the exact opposite.
So despite Trump's campaign-trail promise to block AT&T's latest megamerger (largely believed to be little more than pouting over negative CNN coverage), there's an incredible opportunity here to field a merger sales pitch bullshit supernova -- the scope and scale of which we've never seen before.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: ajit pai, fcc, net neutrality, oversight, privacy, randall stephenson, zero rating
Companies: at&t
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
As intended...
But this is the natural and desired form of the FCC. Like many other regulatory agencies... "Industry Bitches"
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: As intended...
You have provided nothing other than your opinion and therefore it is relegated to the circular file.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: As intended...
So let me throw your own line right back into your face...
You have provided nothing other than your opinion and therefore it is relegated to the circular file.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: As intended...
You're wrong. How do I know? Because I just do, and if you disagree it's up to you to prove that I'm wrong about you being wrong.
That strike you as a convincing argument? Because that's the one you're making, and if you wouldn't accept it against you, you shouldn't expect anyone to buy it coming from you.
If it's so clear then you should have no problem providing evidence to support your position, that you don't means that people can just dismiss your claims outright as unsupported.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: As intended...
I often wonder how many of these guys there actually are.
Maybe it's only one anon, and we're explaining how sources work, over and over again, to the same guy. If so, he's probably having a good laugh.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: As intended...
Lets see here ...
with 50 cents per post and a minimum wage of 7.25 per hour, one would need to make 14.5 posts per minute or one post every four seconds ... for eight hours a dat, five days a week ....
That sounds like a horrible way to make a living.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: As intended...
As stated, the history of the FCC is on public display. No one cares if you cannot learn for yourself, you will just be crushed and ground in the annals of history like all the rest that could not be bothered to learn.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: As intended...
"Things are going back to what they were meant to be."
and where does this bullshit come from ... your back I assume.
"this is the natural and desired form of the FCC"
Your pompous ass approach to public discussion is perhaps a novelty at first but quickly becomes SSDD.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: As intended...
Once again: You're wrong. Because I said so, and it's obvious, and if you want to prove me wrong about you being wrong do your own gorram research on it, as the history clearly states that you're wrong.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: As intended...
Oh it's likely just the one person for this particular logical fallacy. "Here's my assertion that I'm right, and if you want to prove me wrong do my work for me" is practically a signature; while two people can have similar signatures if you see two or more anonymous people on various articles with very similar 'signatures' then it's probably a fair assumption that it's actually the same person.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
What he doesn't tell you is that he means stepping up their investment rate in C-Suite salaries, bonuses, and severance packages.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
As if corporations pay tax ... lmao.
And ... supply side economics has failed miserably for decades. So, yeah - we all know what you will do.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
In other words he will work with us so that we can protect out cable business, or replace the income from it, by screwing with the Internet.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Zero rating
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
I love English because there's multiple ways to say the same thing, and confuse everyone.
I read this statement as "But the problem is that we've had regulation that's unpredictable, and it's preventing us from supporting our products, closing markets to competitors, taking from customers and giving to shareholders, to which I have a personal stake."
Every time I see the AT&T logo dressed up as the Death Star, I feel it's an insult to the Empire, because even they weren't as evil as AT&T.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
give them the no net neutrality feeling
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anti-competition laws
Competition law, or antitrust law, has three main elements: prohibiting agreements or practices that restrict free trading and competition between business. ... banning abusive behavior by a firm dominating a market, or anti-competitive practices that tend to lead to such a dominant position.
Big Telcom is blatantly doing this to online alternatives to cable television.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Now, would you consider that being given a free $20? If not, then why claim that zero-rating offers anything for free? All it is is simply scamming less off of you via data caps.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Lets say..
And you are left alone..
You are a Psychotic young person.. and start looking around and finding things to do..
Anyone for a dead cat?? poisoned Dogs??
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
No internet traffic may be restricted, throttled or priced based on it's content or packet type.
Done....
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
What good is "net neutrality" if we don't enforce it against practices like this?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]