Not Only Is Steve Bannon Sitting In On National Security Meetings, The Usual Paper Trail Is Disappearing

Trump Orders The Cyber To Be Fixed In The Next Sixty Days

from the all-power-to-C:-drive dept

Tue, Jan 31st 2017 10:55am — Tim Cushing

No one likes it when a new boss takes over the office and starts acting like the entire operation can be turned around in a matter of days, if not hours. A "can do" spirit is overrated, especially when it's possessed by someone who knows almost nothing about the day-to-day business or, indeed, anything about this sort of business in general.

But that's what we have going on here. Within days of taking over the job, the new President has unleashed multiple orders and directives to FIX EVERYTHING… with details to follow sometime between "shortly" and "never." The plan to "make America great again" involves:

Telling Americans you're going to "fix" all of these things.
Telling government agencies and officials that they're going to fix all these things
Right now
????

Ars Technica reports:

Today, the Washington Post published what appears to be a draft of an executive order to be signed by President Donald Trump. The order, entitled “Strengthening US Cyber Security and Capabilities,” puts flesh on the bones of the “cyber review” promised by Trump during the campaign. It spells out who will conduct the review and what its specific goals are. The order also sets a brisk pace for the review, calling for initial recommendations for the security of “national security systems” and critical infrastructure within 60 days. The review also has a 60-day deadline to provide the president with a list of “principal cyber adversaries.”

While fire in the belly proclamations aren't unique to the new president, the expectation that multiple officials and agencies will be able to come up with what's required in the next 60 days borders on ridiculous. There's also a 100-day window for recommendations on how to draft the private sector into the government's cyberwar. At this point, multiple agencies are still fighting over who gets to be the top cyberwarrior, as well as whose particular data silo gets to be the biggest. Expecting something coherent in the next couple of months is delusional.

This administration-ordered time crunch -- as unrealistic as it is -- isn't limited to President Trump. As Ars Technica's Sean Gallagher points out, President Obama did the same thing. His 2015 cybersecurity "sprint" order was just as misguided. In the end, all Obama got out of it was some agency head resignations. Government systems are still, for the most part, as insecure as they've been since before the "sprint," when the Government Accountability Office reported that 23 out of 24 agencies surveyed failed to meet information security standards.

But this sort of speedy order is swiftly (no pun intended) becoming a Trump trademark. America's problems can apparently be solved with presidential "to do" lists fired off to a variety of agencies. He appears to believe that if he orders it, it will be done. How do you win the War on Terror, currently in year 16 of ∞? Easy. Come up with a plan to win and then win.

(ii) Within 30 days, a preliminary draft of the Plan to defeat ISIS shall be submitted to the President by the Secretary of Defense.

(iii) The Plan shall include:

(A) a comprehensive strategy and plans for the defeat of ISIS;

It's breathtaking in its simplicity. It's a shame no previous presidents had the forethought to demand a plan to defeat ISIS. And it's doubly-shameful no one involved in the War on Terror could be bothered to formulate a plan for beating terrorists until the president demanded one. Trillions of taxpayer dollars could have been saved if only George W. Bush had demanded a "comprehensive strategy for the defeat of [current top terrorist organization]" to be delivered to him by the end of 2001, AT THE LATEST.

And here's what's going into these orders and directives. Not much. Not even a legal review by White House lawyers.

NBC is reporting that the document [immigration/visa order] was not reviewed by DHS, the Justice Department, the State Department, or the Department of Defense, and that National Security Council lawyers were prevented from evaluating it. Moreover, the New York Times writes that Customs and Border Protection and U.S. Citizen and Immigration Services, the agencies tasked with carrying out the policy, were only given a briefing call while Trump was actually signing the order itself. Yesterday, the Department of Justice gave a “no comment” when asked whether the Office of Legal Counsel had reviewed Trump’s executive orders—including the order at hand. (OLC normally reviews every executive order.)

This process is a reflection of Trump's personality, and it's not a good look for someone in the most powerful office in the world. The federal government often has trouble accomplishing the mundane. Now, its new boss wants it to deliver miracles and is only willing to wait a couple of months for them to be delivered. At some point, realism has to set in, but we're still at the point where the new president believes mountains can not only be moved, but have always been able to be moved at the slightest notice. All that's been missing is someone willing to order the mountain's relocation.

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team

Filed Under: cybersecurity, donald trump, executive order

103 Comments

If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...

Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread

JoeCool (profile), 31 Jan 2017 @ 11:03am

Easy fix
Fixing cyber security is easy! Just institute a policy whereby anyone writing their username and password on a post-it and sticking it to the monitor or a bulletin board, or writing their username and password on a chalkboard or whiteboard will be summarily fired (preferably out a cannon). Passwords will also no longer be up to the user - they will be issued by IT every month.

There = 99.9999% of all cyber security issues are now dealt with. :D
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Dan T., 31 Jan 2017 @ 11:08am

5. PROFIT!!!!!
[ link to this | view in thread ]
This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it

Anonymous Coward, 31 Jan 2017 @ 11:10am

Obama already strengthened domestic surveillance. Trump promised "tremendous backing".

Educate yourself and your family on practical privacy and security hygiene.

https://securityinabox.org/en/
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Babs, 31 Jan 2017 @ 11:14am

But what does this have to do with tech... oh, wait.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Roger Strong (profile), 31 Jan 2017 @ 11:15am

America almost lost President Bush II when he choked on a pretzel and lost consciousness.

If the same were to happen to President* Trump, one can only imagine the disruptive Executive Orders issued the following day.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Anonymous Coward, 31 Jan 2017 @ 11:19am

Hell, we are still worrying about heartbleed. While money can't solve everything, it does give us more options. The man isn't a politician, he might learn, we might teach him. Let go of your anger, it never put you in the right, only the wrong. Funny no one saw him coming, and now he is here and others can't deal with it with anything but ignorance hate. Who is the idiot now? Is that who you, or is that who whom?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Roger Strong (profile), 31 Jan 2017 @ 11:23am

Re:
Also securityinacan and securityonastick.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Mark, 31 Jan 2017 @ 11:25am

Funny
Obama emailed and rogue server with a fake name, he did wonders! Seriously, kool aid is for children.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
timmaguire42 (profile), 31 Jan 2017 @ 11:26am

I believe Neil DeGrasse Tyson already solved this problem--create an unbreakable code. The rest is just implementation.

2 days tops. And 58 days lolling in the sun with a margarita.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Anonymous Coward, 31 Jan 2017 @ 11:28am

On the 11th Day
And on the 11th day He said: "Let the Cyber be fixed!" - and the cyber was fixed.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
sorrykb (profile), 31 Jan 2017 @ 11:30am

Re:
Shit, you're right.
*runs off to buy pretzels before it's too late*
[ link to this | view in thread ]
streetlight (profile), 31 Jan 2017 @ 11:33am

2 days tops. And 58 days lolling in the sun with a margarita.
Sitting on a beach earning 20%.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Ninja (profile), 31 Jan 2017 @ 11:35am

It would be interesting if the result of the plans ti fix everything came with the conclusion Trump should resign. Because at this point he would at least stop breaking more things.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
That one other guy, 31 Jan 2017 @ 11:36am

Re:
No, no, while Trump is *the* worst President ever, his V.P. would be 10 times worse if Trump resigned.
He'd need to fire the V.P. first, then resign.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Ninja (profile), 31 Jan 2017 @ 11:37am

Re: Easy fix
"There = 99.9999% of all cyber security issues are now dealt with."

This can only be achieved by turning off and destroying every single computer powered device in the US. Problem solved!
[ link to this | view in thread ]
orbitalinsertion (profile), 31 Jan 2017 @ 11:39am

Do you think that establishing the FEMA camps that house half our citizens, and the orders to take everyone's guns (multiple times) took longer than 60 days to implement? Sheesh.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Max, 31 Jan 2017 @ 11:41am

Re:
...really? So did he invent one-time pads? Is this some sort of "who invented email" deja-vu?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Anonymous Coward, 31 Jan 2017 @ 11:50am

Re: Re:
But that would make Paul Ryan President...
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Doug (profile), 31 Jan 2017 @ 11:53am

Re:
For those not in the know about this meme:

http://knowyourmeme.com/memes/profit

So basically, we have a president with a South Park level ability to create a plan.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Anonymous Anonymous Coward (profile), 31 Jan 2017 @ 11:57am

Agency created/bought malware
Does this order include fixing the malware being rolled out by various multi-lettered agencies? Will that fix involve telling everyone about them, or will that fix involve actually disinfecting infected computers, or both?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
ChurchHatesTucker (profile), 31 Jan 2017 @ 11:57am

Funny
At some point, realism has to set in

No, wait. I meant tragic.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Roger Strong (profile), 31 Jan 2017 @ 12:02pm

Re: Re: Re:
The first Invertebrate-American President! Take THAT, lib'ruls!
[ link to this | view in thread ]
That One Guy (profile), 31 Jan 2017 @ 12:03pm

"My plan is to make you come up with a plan... that I will then take credit for if it works."
Worse actually, he's not creating the plan, he's demanding that other people do so in a ludicrously short amount of time.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Pixelation, 31 Jan 2017 @ 12:10pm

I like this plan
When it fails, Trump needs to be fired.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Anonymous Coward, 31 Jan 2017 @ 12:11pm

There's nothing about America that can't made greater with the right amount of ignorance. (except for muppet Trump's ego and his Sith Lord Bannon's lust for power)
[ link to this | view in thread ]
SteveMB (profile), 31 Jan 2017 @ 12:16pm

Re:
Donald ought to try a "physician, heal thyself" approach, starting by throwing away his obsolete insecure phone (https://www.wired.com/2017/01/trump-android-phone-security-threat/), which could be (and probably already has been) turned into a remote-controlled bug just by tweeting him a malware link designed to catch his attention (e.g. "Miracle Lotion Can Make Your Hands Grow To Normal Size!").
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Anonymous Coward, 31 Jan 2017 @ 12:18pm

Re: Agency created/bought malware
"Does this order include fixing the malware being rolled out by various multi-lettered agencies?"

Who knew that spy-v-spy meant NSA v. FBI?

We're going to get US agencies hacking one another!
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Anonymous Coward, 31 Jan 2017 @ 12:18pm

Re: "My plan is to make you come up with a plan... that I will then take credit for if it works."
Maybe this falls under stage 2 of his mandate which is to reduce government size. I mean he would be totally justified in firing whole departments who failed to deliver upon his completely achievable orders on time, right?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Bamboo Harvester (profile), 31 Jan 2017 @ 12:25pm

Re: Easy fix
I think your percentages are off. That would only fix roughly 94% of the daily security problems.

Would that I was kidding....
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Anonymous Anonymous Coward (profile), 31 Jan 2017 @ 12:26pm

Re: Re:
Don't you think that a President who would order every government agency to 'fix the Cyber' in 60 days would be smart enough to stuff his insecure phone into a Faraday bag when he is not using it, or especially when he is discussing high security items with his cohorts (strike out) advisers? See, he fixed 'His Cyber', waiting on everyone else.

Well, maybe not.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Bamboo Harvester (profile), 31 Jan 2017 @ 12:29pm

Re: "My plan is to make you come up with a plan... that I will then take credit for if it works."
I always found giving a deadline resulted in MUCH harder work being done on the project, and positive results - even if the entire project wasn't completed on time.

Given that quite a lot of his campaign rhetoric boiled down to getting rid of deadwood, I can't really disagree with the method.

YES, it'll be abused. So will anything else. This *is* government we're talking about.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
jupiterkansas (profile), 31 Jan 2017 @ 12:32pm

Re: I like this plan
When it fails, he'll blame other people and say "I tried!"
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Anonymous Coward, 31 Jan 2017 @ 12:34pm

Re: Re: Re:
Sorry... new succession order. After the Vice President is the current host of the Apprentice TV show.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
That One Guy (profile), 31 Jan 2017 @ 12:39pm

You can do that?!
(ii) Within 30 days, a preliminary draft of the Plan to defeat ISIS shall be submitted to the President by the Secretary of Defense. (iii) The Plan shall include: (A) a comprehensive strategy and plans for the defeat of ISIS;

Forget ISIS, I had no idea the president could simply order a problem to be solved like that, and in a single month at that.

Might I suggest he get on a few of the following?

World-Hunger

Homelessness

Poverty

Violence

Bigotry

Disease
[ link to this | view in thread ]
That One Guy (profile), 31 Jan 2017 @ 12:44pm

Re: Re: "My plan is to make you come up with a plan... that I will then take credit for if it works."
Did you often set ludicrously short deadlines for insanely complex subjects?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
David (profile), 31 Jan 2017 @ 12:47pm

Cyber enemies list.
Russia.
China.
North Korea.
A few others, but those are the main players.

Okay, that took 45 seconds. Damn, I should be famous.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Vidiot (profile), 31 Jan 2017 @ 12:47pm

Re: Re: Re:
Here's a tip: The insecure phone comes out of the Faraday bag every morning between 3 and 4 to launch the daily Tweetstorm... kids, have your scanners and sniffers handy!
[ link to this | view in thread ]
orbitalinsertion (profile), 31 Jan 2017 @ 12:49pm

Re: Re: Re: "My plan is to make you come up with a plan... that I will then take credit for if it works."
That's how we get a lot of software.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Vidiot (profile), 31 Jan 2017 @ 12:52pm

Re: Re:
Genius idea! A case of slightly oversized Doritos, gifted to a Pennsylvania Avenue address... in each bag, 121 chances to meet President Pence!
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Anonymous Anonymous Coward (profile), 31 Jan 2017 @ 12:52pm

Re: You can do that?!
You forgot:

Corruption
Greed
Stupidity in Business
Bailing out Stupidity in Business (oh wait, he has counted upon that in the past)
Hatred
Misogyny
Sexism
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Anonymous Coward, 31 Jan 2017 @ 12:53pm

Not getting the Trump bashing
The President's powers are limited.
Unlike most politicians he is actually trying to do what he said he would do.

Ordering any government agency to do anything within 60 days is like asking to move a mountain. But that just highlights how inefficient government is at doing anything. Maybe some changes could make government more efficient, maybe Trump is simply wasting paper, time will tell.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
GristleMissle, 31 Jan 2017 @ 12:53pm

Give him a chance
Clearly you all know nothing about security. Donald Trump has one of the best security advisors in the history of cybersecurity.

There are few things that he will be incapable of doing. And this idea that you're pushing about how security is difficult to fix is absurd. Security is one of the easiest things to do when it comes to computers.

What we need to do is all sit down like intelligent people and pick from this list below.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_antivirus_software

Or better yet, I think it would be a good idea if Trump demanded that the tech companies write a new government approved piece of software and force that to be included in all new installs of computers.

Done.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Anonymous Coward, 31 Jan 2017 @ 1:00pm

Re: Easy fix
That wont work, because the more powerful a person is, and the more damage that hijacking their accounts can do, the less likely they are to follow security directives.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Anonymous Coward, 31 Jan 2017 @ 1:07pm

Re: "My plan is to make you come up with a plan... that I will then take credit for if it works."
That is because he has a simple plan, tell other to fix the problems, and the people he tells, being senior management, will use the same plan and tell their underling to fix the problem who will... until the solving the problem is assigned to someone with no underlings.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Anonymous Coward, 31 Jan 2017 @ 1:12pm

"Ignorant as a Child"
That Chinese description of Trump's diplomacy "skills" can now be extended to include, well, pretty much everything else too. We have a 10 year-old helming our Ship of State.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it

Anonymous Coward, 31 Jan 2017 @ 1:13pm

Fake news.

Not order, but draft.

Not fix but provide recommendations.

And yes, bezos disclaimer missing also. He stands to lose a few billion $$ a year he gets by postal service providing free express mail from China for Amazon small packages.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
aldestrawk (profile), 31 Jan 2017 @ 1:21pm

the biggest vulnerability
As I see it, the biggest vulnerability right now is that a hacker can start a trade war, or a real war, with a single tweet, That is, unless Trump beats them to it.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
USA Unite together, 31 Jan 2017 @ 1:29pm

TRUMP CAN DO IT-move that mountain, nothing to hard for him...American workers built Manhattan
Getting the cooperation of the rest of government, not going to work since the downsizing, sabotaging, etc.
TRUMP should do it again, "You're fire," and hire those dedicate hard workers who were let go from the last administration back with pay, benefits, all...
a Unites States of American worker.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Ld Elon, 31 Jan 2017 @ 1:32pm

Re: I like this plan
Maybe it'll catch-fire when the 'burning of the book' event happens...
He got that little 'black book' right.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Bamboo Harvester (profile), 31 Jan 2017 @ 1:34pm

Re: Re: Re: "My plan is to make you come up with a plan... that I will then take credit for if it works."
A couple of times. To weed out the deadwood. The people that tried to meet the deadline kept their jobs.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Anonymous Coward, 31 Jan 2017 @ 1:35pm

Re: Give him a chance
Donald Trump has one of the best security advisors in the history of cybersecurity.

You forgot the /s
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Bamboo Harvester (profile), 31 Jan 2017 @ 1:36pm

Re: Cyber enemies list.
You forgot US Senate Aides....
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Ld Elon, 31 Jan 2017 @ 1:36pm

Re: Cyber enemies list.
You forgot Britain, Israel, Turkey, Saudis, and France.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
killthelawyers (profile), 31 Jan 2017 @ 1:42pm

Re: Re: Re: Re: "My plan is to make you come up with a plan... that I will then take credit for if it works."
Congratulations on identifying one of the sources of insecurity.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Anonymous Coward, 31 Jan 2017 @ 1:42pm

Re: Not getting the Trump bashing
"Ordering any government agency to do anything within 60 days is like asking to move a mountain"

I beg your pardon! I realize that it sometimes takes hours for the government to screw things up, but I'm absolutely certain, with a job this big, and this much pushing behind it, they can screw it up in seconds!

Moving a mountain is easy. Finding that damned lever and a proper fulcrum are the parts that're a pain in the ass!
[ link to this | view in thread ]
That One Guy (profile), 31 Jan 2017 @ 1:44pm

Re: Cyber enemies list.
If you define 'enemies' not just as 'groups that would like to attack us' but 'and those that would like to make it easier for them to do so', you could tack on several USG agencies and more than a few politicians to that list too. Like say, anyone who advocates for crippling encryption.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
killthelawyers (profile), 31 Jan 2017 @ 1:45pm

Re: 2 days tops. And 58 days lolling in the sun with a margarita.
Remember, after you break the cyber you have to drill through the other locks and then convince the FBI to turn off the power by staging a terrorist attack first. Also, look out for barefoot guys in tank tops.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
That One Guy (profile), 31 Jan 2017 @ 1:47pm

Re: Re: Re: Re: "My plan is to make you come up with a plan... that I will then take credit for if it works."
Which might work if you know that what you're asking for isn't likely to be accomplished in the time frame provided, even if they can work towards it, but whether or not Trump knows and is willing to admit that remains to be seen.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
ECA (profile), 31 Jan 2017 @ 1:50pm

corp MENTALITY
FIX IT,
FIX IT NOW..
I dont have any idea HOW to do it..
BUT, you FIX IT..

Figure out HOW to deal with ISIS...
there are a few ways..
RESTRICT ALL ACCESS to ALL MUSLIM NATIONS..
TAKE everyones pictures with TRUE ID, and place it in a data base..(sounds like drivers lic/ID cards)

PUT UP A FENCE..monitor ALL BORDER(hmm, (Sounds like No mans land in Korea)

BOMB EVERYTHING...and piss off every other Muslim and other religions in the Area..(hmm, sounds like Vietnam)

HOW about the Mexican Fence...you REALLY want to IMPACT CORPS in the USA?? DROP all tariffs, and FORCE CORPS to only CHARGE EQUAL PRICES for the goods...it would PISS THEM ALL OFF..Paying for a Headlight system at $200-300 and marking it down to $50 would REALLY put a dent in CORPS ideas..
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Not.You, 31 Jan 2017 @ 1:53pm

I have the plan Trump is looking for
It's so damn simple even Trump will comprehend it.

1) Kill all of the members of ISIS
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Cdaragorn (profile), 31 Jan 2017 @ 1:53pm

Re: Re: Re: Re: "My plan is to make you come up with a plan... that I will then take credit for if it works."
While the smart ones just quit and got a job somewhere that doesn't think beating people over the head is a good idea.

This kind of management never produces good results.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Anonymous Coward, 31 Jan 2017 @ 1:59pm

Re: "My plan is to make you come up with a plan... that I will then take credit for if it works."
Light speed is too slow, so we'll have to go right to ... LUDICROUS SPEED!!!
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Anonymous Coward, 31 Jan 2017 @ 2:14pm

Re:
Oh please, don't tell me techdirt has become infected with anti-trump loonies. you people make the anti-Obama wacks look normal in comparison.

Trump is president and is doing a decent job so far. Deal with it Snowflakes!
[ link to this | view in thread ]
shanen (profile), 31 Jan 2017 @ 2:15pm

Spelling error in headline: It's "the Siber".
As in the Siberian candidate.

You thought Trump was having trouble understanding and saying "the cyber". Not at all. Just his terror of the Freudian slip.

Give my love to Putin, eh?

P.S. I'm not saying that Comey is a Russian mole. I'm saying that there is a high probability that there is at least one mole in the FBI office in NYC and you should start looking in the cabal of FBI agents who threatened Comey back in October... And have a super-nice day!
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Roger Strong (profile), 31 Jan 2017 @ 2:16pm

Re: Re:
Voted Funny.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Roger Strong (profile), 31 Jan 2017 @ 2:20pm

Re: Re: Re:
On the other hand we may be one pretzel away from Steve Bannon pulling an Al Haig and declaring himself in control.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Anonymous Coward, 31 Jan 2017 @ 2:38pm

https://www.facebook.com/berkeleybreathed/photos/a.114529165244512.10815.108793262484769/14480420118 93214/?type=3&theater
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Anonymous Coward, 31 Jan 2017 @ 3:01pm

We all know how this is going to end....
People with a realistic understanding of the subject and the problems that needs to be faced, will give a realistic estimate of a timeframe and which goals that is damaging or downright impossible to accomplish.
People that want to keep their jobs and get promotions regardless of their professional integrity (and people who call it "the cyber") will give a plan they think will please with unrealistic estimates, damaging practices and a solid plan for completely destroying what is left...
Guess who will be getting a raise and who will be listened to.

Looking at it with an understanding of the subject and from outside the US, it seems to be a very scary time we are facing in IT.
As with Trump and his other policies, I really hope that I will be proven the fool and somehow it will turn out to be good ideas. If that day comes I will be glad to admit my faulty viewpoint and wear a big sign that tells everyone that I was wrong, because being right in these cases, is so much worse.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
withersteen (profile), 31 Jan 2017 @ 3:02pm

Over-promis, under-deliver. It will be pure luck if he can improve on anything Obama did. But, Trumpkins will take all the credit he can and none of the blame. Get used to it.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Anonymous Coward, 31 Jan 2017 @ 3:23pm

Re: Re:
It looks like you are the one having a hard time dealing with it. Maybe if you ask real nice we can bring your binkie to the safe space you so desperately need.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Anonymous Coward, 31 Jan 2017 @ 3:25pm

Re: TRUMP CAN DO IT-move that mountain, nothing to hard for him...American workers built Manhattan
Actually I believe it was the Dutch who started the work.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Lawrence D’Oliveiro, 31 Jan 2017 @ 3:38pm

Seems Like This Has Been Canned
The Register is reporting that Trump’s signing of this Executive Order has been cancelled.

Maybe somebody has finally found a big enough clue-bat...
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Anonymous Coward, 31 Jan 2017 @ 3:45pm

Did anyone actually read the order?
I did. And speaking as someone who has been doing security since DARPA days, it's a hot mess. It reads as if someone made a list of every buzzword, then attempted to ensure that they used all of them at least one time in the document. Most of it makes no sense at all. Some of it is absurd.

Here's an example: "A review of the principal U.S. cyber adversaries (Adversaries Review) shall commence immediately".

I have no idea what that means, because I don't know what a cyber adversary is or how we're supposed to determine who they are. A decent argument could be made that MI6 is a "cyber adversary" since they spy on the US just like every other nation with the capability does. But since they're a political, military, and economic ally...are they an adversary?

Attribution is hard. REALLY hard. Even when there are obvious clues, it's still hard -- because it's trivial to plant those. We don't actually know who the really good adversaries are because they're the ones we can't identify. And while the three-letter agencies may think they know: I sincerely doubt it. (Consider: countries infiltrate each other's intelligence agencies routinely. So if there's a hack that appears to be coming from China, is it Chinese intelligence or a plant in Chinese intelligence?)

The reports that are generated as a result of this order are going to the same kind of word salad with a generous topping of platitudes and generic recommendations, because to actually, seriously tackle the problem of figuring out who the adversaries are is a 10-year project. So nobody's going to do that. They're going to spout the usual BS and maybe make some stuff up.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
neo anderson says, 31 Jan 2017 @ 4:57pm

except a day on pluto is about 50 years
so not to worry a day on pluto is a long long time
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Daydream, 31 Jan 2017 @ 5:00pm

Re: I have the plan Trump is looking for
It's a bit more complicated then that.
If you have that as step 1, then:

2) Kill everyone who was providing material support to ISIS.

3) Kill everyone with views and beliefs similar or identical to those of ISIS (to be identified by prediction software).

4) Kill everyone who protests against the previous killings, they're probably sympathizers (again, identify targets using prediction algorithms).

5) Repeat Step 4 ad infinitum until there are no more targets.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Anonymous Coward, 31 Jan 2017 @ 5:46pm

No, you see, Trump's got this guy named Not Sure... and he's going to fix The Cyber in ONE WEEK.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
TripMN, 31 Jan 2017 @ 5:59pm

Re: You can do that?!
Please guys, keep it in the realm of Tech.

He needs to solve whether P = NP
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Anonymous Coward, 31 Jan 2017 @ 6:46pm

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: "My plan is to make you come up with a plan... that I will then take credit for if it works."
Can confirm, would be gone in two seconds.

Outfits like those described do not deserve two weeks notice, just mail in your badge.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Anonymous Coward, 31 Jan 2017 @ 6:49pm

Re:
Bush 43 was in much better shape than the dumpf, I doubt donny would survive a bad coughing fit.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Anonymous Coward, 31 Jan 2017 @ 6:55pm

Re:
Imagine some asshole grabbing your pussy ... oh wait, you don't have one. Ok, imagine someone taking out a full page ad demanding your arrest and incarceration. You would be good with that? The guy is a loose cannon wrecking havoc on deck and the gale force winds are not letting up, what do you do? Get rid of that POS. But noooo - anyone who questions fearless leader is consumed by hatred and ignorance according to this one person posting their bullshit. Who is the idiot, it is still dumpf.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Anonymous Coward, 31 Jan 2017 @ 6:58pm

Re:
Creating unbreakable code is not all that difficult, said code is also not very useful.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Anonymous Coward, 31 Jan 2017 @ 7:02pm

Re: Re:
Decent job so far includes pissing off all your allies and enemies at the same time, violating the constitution on day one with further infractions on each and every day thereafter, and having the worst approval ratings for a new president in the history of measuring such a thing. The guy is a loser, admit it.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Anonymous Coward, 31 Jan 2017 @ 7:06pm

Re:
Soon there will be camps (if not already) in the desert for keeping those about to be deported.

Internment camps, concentration camps, I wonder what they will call them this time.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Anonymous Coward, 31 Jan 2017 @ 7:08pm

Re: Not getting the Trump bashing
Whitewashing looks to be your calling, hope they pay you well.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it

Anonymous Coward, 31 Jan 2017 @ 8:15pm

Re: Re: Re:
The sound of snowflakes whining in the morning,,, it
smells like victory!
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Roger Strong (profile), 31 Jan 2017 @ 8:43pm

It's a shame no previous presidents had the forethought to demand a plan to defeat ISIS

Some perspective: Trump just fixed the F-35.

Before Trump's inauguration:

The F-35! It’s “not very good!” It’s “out of control!” It’s comes at a “tremendous cost!”

10 days after Trump's inauguration:

The F-35 fighter jet — a great plane by the way, I have to tell you, and Lockheed is doing a very good job as of now,” Trump said Monday at a meeting with small business leaders at the White House. “There were great delays, about seven years of delays, tremendous cost overruns. We’ve ended all of that and we’ve got that program really, really now in good shape, so I’m very proud of that.”

He'll defeat ISIS the same way. By tweeting that he's done so.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Anonymous Coward, 31 Jan 2017 @ 9:20pm

Re: Re: Re: Re: "My plan is to make you come up with a plan... that I will then take credit for if it works."
> The people that tried to meet the deadline kept their jobs.

So, you kept the dumb ones. Congratulations.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Anonymous Coward, 31 Jan 2017 @ 9:33pm

Ban windows
1)fix cyber
2)ban windows
3)fix all other problems

sorry

1)do nothing real
2)??
3)profit!
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Dazed and confused, 31 Jan 2017 @ 10:48pm

Maybe everyone should just acquiesce to bureaucrats
The reason people think this is hard is they've swallowed the lie that bureaucrats have been feeding them for the last several decades.

There was a time in this nation when hard problems were just SOLVED. People got off their asses and did something instead of passing around some memos and declarations and wondering who was going to actually take care of things.

This guy may be crazy, but telling Washington to get off their asses and fix stuff THEY KNOW IS BROKEN, with consequences for them personally if they don't sounds like a damn good idea to me.

I work in IT, I know you can't wave a wand and fix this stuff, but the answer IS NOT "it hard, we have think 'bout 'pooter too much to make safe' sitting on their thumbs. This stuff does NOT fix itself.

The private sector sees a security problem? They fix it like their asses and hair are on fire. The US Gov't sees a security problem, they argue who gets to be the boss over the project and allow for a 10 year bid process. If they can build surveillance systems quickly that adapt to the modern computing environment regularly, they can sure damn fix the stuff they have. It's a matter of motivation.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Lawrence D’Oliveiro, 31 Jan 2017 @ 10:59pm

Re: There was a time in this nation when hard problems were just SOLVED.
When was that, exactly?

Was the 2008 financial crisis just SOLVED?

Was Israel just SOLVED?

Was civil rights just SOLVED?

Was the Vietnam War just SOLVED? Or did the US basically give up?

Was the Korean War just SOLVED? Or is it in fact technically still in progress?

Was the Depression just SOLVED?

Please let me know when you think this wonderful time was.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
PaulT (profile), 1 Feb 2017 @ 12:19am

Re: Re: Easy fix
I suspect Trump has the same passwords for his accounts as he does for his luggage, like President Skroob before him
[ link to this | view in thread ]
PaulT (profile), 1 Feb 2017 @ 12:21am

Re: Re:
Well, he's hired Guiliani, who couldn't get his own security company's website secured, so I'm sure he'll be straight on to that one.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Cowardly Lion, 1 Feb 2017 @ 12:40am

Re: Re: You can do that?!
At last, seven presidents later, "The War on Drugs®" can finally be won.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Cowardly Lion, 1 Feb 2017 @ 1:12am

Who gives a rat's ass whether you're getting the Trump bashing or not?
I'm still waiting for his unscaleable wall, and for Mexico to pay for it, I'm still waiting for the DC swamp to be drained.

President "grab 'em by the pussy" ran his mouth off before the vote. Now is when he gets to make good.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Ninja (profile), 1 Feb 2017 @ 1:43am

Re: Re:
Have my funny vote! The purpose was comedy, right?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
An-other-onymous, 1 Feb 2017 @ 4:16am

Re: Re: You can do that?!
As I've commented elsewhere, taking a leaf from Monty Python's "How to fix it"
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tNfGyIW7aHM
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Doug (profile), 1 Feb 2017 @ 5:20am

Re: Re: You can do that?!
You mean decide if P == NP, right?

If P = NP, then P == NP by definition, unless you're running in parallel and assignment is not atomic. Then if P = NP we still need to decide if P == NP. Maybe what you really meant was NP = P. That would/could be good.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
TripMN, 1 Feb 2017 @ 5:45am

Re: Re: Re: You can do that?!
You are differing in assignment versus equality. I can quickly surmise you are a developer.

I was using the mathematical equals which anyone who doesn't have a background that includes programming would read more naturally.

But yes, your statement is correct.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
GEM, 1 Feb 2017 @ 12:42pm

Re: Who gives a rat's ass whether you're getting the Trump bashing or not?
If he builds that 30 foot wall, I'm investing heavy into any manufacturer of 35 foot ladders.

---
[ link to this | view in thread ]
GEMont, 1 Feb 2017 @ 12:56pm

Re: I have the plan Trump is looking for
Not a good plan.

Most of the ISIS members who wear masks are actually White Rental Mercenaries and US Corporate Kill Squads, and killing them all would place ISIS squarely at the feet of The 5 Eyes nations where they actually live. That would be bad PR.

ISIS is the Boogeyman. If you kill the Bogeyman, you remove the thing that creates fear among your peasants.

If your peasants are not afraid, they will become overly interested in exactly how their peace-time taxes are spent by those who are trusted with such things.

That would be bad for the billionaires.

When they are frightened, like in times of war, they never question where their taxes are spent. Status Quo restored. Rich richer, and poor fukt.

---
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Anonymous Coward, 6 Feb 2017 @ 7:38am

Fix copyright.

Fix climate change.

Fix corruption.

Fix capitalism.

Good luck with that, especially the latter.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
AnonCow, 25 Feb 2017 @ 8:48pm

Three step description of the Trump administration

1.) Draft executive order

2.) ???????

3.) Profit
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Chris, 3 Jun 2017 @ 12:14am

(BVTK) Bravatek Solutions INC.
I read on there web site they already have contracts to fix certain military departments cyber security issues . They was going to do a reverse split until Trump gave them a contract and more are to come by what I am reading on there site So they will not be doing no reverse splits and there stock prices are expected to go back to there all time highs and possibly more . (BVTK) Bravatek Solutions INC. This company could end up making all of us investors millions if not trillions of dollars .
[ link to this | view in thread ]