Wyden, Other Senators Warn That Net Neutrality Repeal Will Make SOPA Backlash Look Like A Fireside Snuggle
from the put-your-money-where-your-mouth-is dept
We've repeatedly noted how for some stupid reason, net neutrality is treated as a partisan issue in Washington -- with Democrats (generally) in support, and Republicans (generally) opposing the idea. It's an absurd, myopic paradigm given the fact that net neutrality has broad, bipartisan consumer support. Most people want the internet to function as a relatively-level playing field. Everybody wants to be able to access the content and services of their choice without interference from the likes of Comcast and AT&T, who seem hell bent on using their monopoly over the last mile to their anti-competitive advantage.
With the looming specter of a net neutrality rule repeal under Trump, the GOP, and new FCC Boss Ajit Pai, a number of Democratic Senators (including Ron Wyden and Ed Markey) held a press event (video) warning that if the GOP and FCC try to repeal net neutrality, it will result in a "political firestorm" they may not be entirely prepared for. The Senators were quick to recall that roughly 4 million consumers reached out in support of the FCC's net neutrality rules a few years ago, a number Markey proclaimed would look "miniscule" in comparison to the looming backlash against the rules' repeal.
Markey's office also issued a statement saying that he'd fight tooth and nail against repeal of the rules, in whatever form that arrives:
"Despite what the cable companies and Republicans say about net neutrality, there is nothing broken that needs fixing,” said Senator Markey, a member of the Commerce, Science and Transportation Committee. “I will oppose any regulatory efforts, including repeal, forbearance, interpretative rule, or refusal to enforce existing rules, as well as any legislative efforts to undo or roll back the Open Internet Order. We stand united in this fight to ensure that all Americans have access to a free and open Internet."
While it's true that the backlash to an attack on net neutrality could make SOPA and PIPA look like a beach-side picnic, the repeal won't arrive in the way the agency's rules first arrived. With the process of repealing the rules within the FCC's existing regulatory framework a giant bureaucratic headache that would require another very public comment process, the ISPs (and the politicians that love them) likely have another tactic in mind -- at least based on my 20 years, ten hours a day, of watching the telecom sector (and every other industry) dominate both parties of Congress.
At first, that will involve having Pai simply refuse to enforce the rules as they exist now (which we already saw with Pai's decision to scrap the FCC's zero rating inquiry). Pai's job in this stage play will be to pay empty lip service to things like the digital divide, while generally keeping the FCC focused on bland, non-controversial policies until the real hangman (a campaign-contribution soaked Congress) arrives.
From there, the GOP has quietly been making it clear they want to push a Communications Act rewrite that will focus on rolling back the FCC's classification of ISPs as common carriers under Title II, therefore obliterating not only net neutrality -- but the FCC's ability to act as broadband watchdog entirely. This being a new, charming post-truth era, this assault on net neutrality, broadband provider oversight and accountability will most likely be dressed up as a massive boon to job creation, broadband expansion, and the nation's puppies.
Expect it to be named something along the lines of The Making Broadband Great Again Act of 2017.
This bill, whether it comes as a Communications Act rewrite or some other bill, will also probably claim to put the net neutrality debate to bed by including a few net neutrality restrictions even large ISPs don't actually care about (like banning them from outright blocking websites). What it won't do is address any of the hot-button areas where the net neutrality debate is occurring right now, like zero rating, interconnection, or the use of usage caps and overage fees. Given it will certainly be written in part by AT&T, Verizon, Comcast and Charter lawyers, it will just as certainly contain other loopholes to ensure their satisfaction.
Whatever this bill winds up looking like or is called, it will be (and already is on some fronts), portrayed as a "compromise" that Democrats will be told they must support if they're to be considered "serious" in their pledge to protect net neutrality and the public at large. But given the goal of removing oversight from the likes of Comcast, the bill itself will likely hurt more than it helps, and if these Democratic Senators actually want to show they have anything resembling a spine, they'll need to stage fierce opposition to the bill to prove their dedication to a healthy internet is more than just smoke and mirrors.
In light of a Congress that long ago made it clear that it prioritizes telecom cash contributions over consumers, the best "solution" for net neutrality at this juncture would be leaving the existing rules -- and the FCC's authority over broadband providers -- intact.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: copyright, fcc, net neutrality, open internet, public, ron wyden, sopa
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
How much is it really going to change?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
https://www.aclu.org/
https://www.eff.org/
https://www.freepress.net/
also you can set them as your charity on https://smile.amazon.com/
also write to your House Representative and senators
http://www.house.gov/representatives/find/
https://www.senate.gov/general/contact_ ... erBy=state
and the FCC
https://www.fcc.gov/about/contact
they are also not getting away with it many are calling them out.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
I say don't worry about it
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
They don't have to repeal it.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Follow the Money
Not that I expect that it will ever happen, but doesn't Congress control the purse strings? What would happen if they actually de-funded the White House? Target those things that would cause the President pain, until that entity actually started to follow his oath.
From Article VI, Clause 3 of the Constitution.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Follow the Money
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Follow the Money
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Follow the Money
My thought about impinging the White House budget is about a strategy for 'killing' (metaphorically, not literally) the head so as to allow the body to wither. It would be better still if money were removed from politics altogether. But, baby steps. And not likely with this administration. Congress a couple of years from now might be a different story, though unlikely due to political parties and their various nefarious intents, and that their elections are purchased rather than earned for integrity to a particular cause or causes. Speak to the masses with what they want to hear, get the money to speak to more than the opponent by secretly promising to support XXX.
That the FTC has miserably failed in their responsibility under several administrations is the shame that will enable the singularity monopoly to exist. And take all that USF money to the bottom line, since they won't spend it on what they are supposed to spend it on.
Think about that black hole. One service provider, dictating what they will or won't do with the government kowtowing. The entropy being anyone who wants some kind of service, being sucked into...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Follow the Money
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Numbers of Businesses
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Its true!
He didnt mention kittens. See! Proof that Mike hates kittens.
(I would also mention that this is proof that Mike is a shill for the Democrats or Republicans, but I dont know enough about American politics to know who to choose)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: We could have had worse
Far easier than admitting to yourself that you just voted for the effective end of the society that you spent your whole life in.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: We could have had worse
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Thanks to zero rating, companies like Netflix, Facebook, and others have already paid their dues to keep their services from being controlled.
Oddly enough, it was these companies which helped get SOPA defeated by simply preventing access to their services and replacing their default home page with contact information of their government.
It's extremely unlikely this will happen again.
If companies were smart, they'd use this tactic to their advantage, say to remove an idiotic executive order written by an idiot?
The way to make America great again is through education, something we've sorely lacked for over 30 years.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Lets see....
How many people can take off 1 month at work..
How many times can you Cross the nation to DO IT..
Do you want to take the KIDS WITH YOU??
Cost of:
Fuel
Living, Camping, Parking, Tim eoff work, Child sitter,
Washington DC isnt the SLUM it was Supposed to be..
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
THEY HAVE THEIR SAY,,
These folks keep running Rough shod over Civilian Wants/needs and regulations that were INSTALLED for a reason...
Lets change things..
TIME for a VOTE from the Citizens..
HOURLY PAY ONLY...
$40,000 per year
T&A system IN PLACE...(time and attendance)
The Job USED to be Honorable and only paid travel and living Expenses.. AND DC wasnt to BAD to live around..(they DIDNT have HOMES in DC)
They VOTED their OWN wages, and increases and the LAND VALUE ion DC AREA, is over the TOP..EXCEPT where all the SERVICE WORKERS LIVE..
If you get enough VOTES in STATE, they HAVE TO CHANGE IT..
IF we get enough NATIONALLY...WE WIN..
[ link to this | view in chronology ]