Netflix Is No Longer Worried About Net Neutrality Now That It's Massive And Successful
from the sorry,-I-got-mine dept
Once upon a time, Netflix was among the fiercest supporters of net neutrality, and a consistent critic of arbitrary and unnecessary broadband usage caps. So much so that the company effectively became public enemy number one at many of the nation's broadband providers, resulting in a steady stream of bizarre policy and lobbying attacks on the company. Netflix, we were told by a rotating crop of ISP-tied mouthpieces (even by current FCC boss Ajit Pai), was a dirty freeloader, and a nasty company responsible for most of the internet's ills.
But as Netflix has grown larger and more powerful, the company's positions on usage caps and net neutrality has, well, softened.
Back in January, a company letter to shareholders downplayed the looming death of net neutrality, suggesting that Netflix was so popular -- any attack on it would be seppuku:
"Weakening of US net neutrality laws, should that occur, is unlikely to materially affect our domestic margins or service quality because we are now popular enough with consumers to keep our relationships with ISPs stable."
Of course, what Netflix actually meant was that it's now powerful and wealthy enough to go toe to toe with giant ISPs on interconnection and other disputes. The problem: while Netflix may now be strong enough to survive a world without net neutrality, that's not necessarily going to be true for the next Netflix. Smaller companies will absolutely be hampered by the rising spread of usage caps and zero rating, which as we've long noted are increasingly being used as anti-competitive weapons against them. And the current government has made it very clear that's perfectly ok.
Netflix CEO Reed Hastings reiterated the company's confidence on this subject in a meeting with reporters last week at the company's headquarters, where he insisted the company was "not too worried" about the government's plans to gut net neutrality:
"Netflix CEO Reed Hastings says he’s “not too worried” about what will happen if new FCC chairman Ajit Pai eliminates the Title II regulations that have guaranteed a neutral internet experience for US consumers in recent years.
Speaking to a group of journalists at Netflix’s headquarters in Los Gatos, California, earlier today, Hastings said he believes “the culture around net neutrality is very strong. The expectations of consumers are very strong. So even if the formal framework gets weakened,” he continued, “we don’t see a big risk actualizing, because consumers know they’re entitled to getting all of the web services."
Hastings believes that Netflix is just so damn popular, consumer outrage will magically keep ISPs on their best behavior even if Pai, Trump and the GOP kill all telecom consumer protections. But as we saw during recent interconnection feuds, ISPs have become clever at dodging blame for the congestion they intentionally caused in order to kill settlement-free peering and extract additional funds from transit and content companies (detailed in the New York AG's recent lawsuit against Charter). You'd be hard pressed to think that 10% of the population actually understood what was happening during these feuds.
That said, consumers, startups and people that care about a healthy, open internet should worry.
The new FCC has already killed an inquiry into zero rating, which means incumbent ISPs are now free to use caps to hamper competing streaming services. And with AT&T, Verizon, Comcast and Charter now effectively dictating government internet policy, you can be sure broadband competition issues will be placed on a far back burner -- resulting in a steady expansion of usage caps and overage fees. And Congress is cooking up one or more bills that will not only kill net neutrality and consumer privacy protections, but gut regulatory oversight of one of the least competitive industries in America.
But gosh, now that Netflix is large and successful (with 94 million subscribers worldwide), this is all just something that's apparently going to work itself out. We've tracked a similar trajectory at Google, where net neutrality principles slowly but surely disappeared as the company jumped into the wireless industry. With net neutrality's two biggest and wealthiest proponents wavering on net neutrality now that they've got theirs, the idea of an internet free of incumbent ISP control needs all the help it can damn well get.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: competition, fcc, innovation, monpolies, net neutrality, open internet, reed hastings
Companies: netflix
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Sit tight Netflix, this is going to bite you where it hurts the most: the pockets. Good thing you can survive the bite. But it's going to bleed.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
https://boingboing.net/2016/06/24/how-to-protect-the-future-web.html
[ link to this | view in thread ]
You're slowly taking "a similar trajectory" to nearly everyone who looks at BIG business...
Yes, you're aging out of "libertarianism". Late, but inevitable.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
You're slowly taking "a similar trajectory" to nearly everyone who looks at BIG business...
Yes, you're aging out of "libertarianism". Late, but inevitable.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: You're slowly taking "a similar trajectory" to nearly everyone who looks at BIG business...
With plenty of real regulation and HIGH income taxes.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Kind of similar to Google
It's like these companies are living beings... (let that sink in) that act in their best interests and turn their backs on society and community and all those that came before them that created the infrastructure, tools and opportunities for them to grow and grow and grow into pathological entities.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Kind of similar to Google
That's a good way of making people disregard everything you've said or are about to say.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Kind of similar to Google
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Redundant statement is redundant.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
Communism and Capitalism have a lot of the same core foundations (including support for free public education). Just because Communism failed doesn't mean all it's ideas were bad, 8 out of 10 of Karl Marx's core principles of communism are well practiced in all capitalist countries in the world.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
Your move.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
I doubt that 1/100 of 1% of the population has the intellectual capability and educational background required to even BEGIN to comprehend this -- even if it is explained to them using a fifth-grade vocabulary. The masses of inferior people out there are simply too dull, lazy, and ignorant to comprehend anything that doesn't fit in a tweet.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
Without such rule, you communication provider can control your world view, by deciding what information sources yoy can use.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re:
Not only distort your world view but also extort users (both consumers and businesses) for more and more money. ISPs are quickly becoming the one delivery mechanism through which we get access to all media and communications so that's obviously a lot of leverage.
Funny thing. It's 2017 and if you live in the US you have more access to various dial-up providers than broadband providers. Let that sink in for a second.
Now imagine if those same rules applied and everyone had access to 6 or 12 broadband ISPs that weren't geo-locked like landline ISPs are today. Providers would have to compete on things like actual speed (not "up to" speed), customer service, up time, etc., On no, what a horrible world where companies have to compete...
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: You're slowly taking "a similar trajectory" to nearly everyone who looks at BIG business...
Read Isayah Berlins beautiful definitions of negative and positive freedoms (A lot of the rest he wrote is less thought through).
Read about debt bondage. Ulf von Lilienfeld-Toal has a good contemporate paper on a related topic (though not that beuatiful!).
Read some stakeholder theory as a modern tool to understand political process.
If you do that with an open mind, the more extreme end of libertarian ideals is looking far less attractive.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re:
Checkmate
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Technology to the rescue
The next Netflix won't be using centralised Content-Delivery-Networks. It will be using decentralised protocols to route the traffic to the shortest path. Check IPFS.
Add in a local neighbourhood mesh network to avoid ISP-lines whenever possible and there is your breeding ground for competition.
Glad to help.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Technology to the rescue
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re: You're slowly taking "a similar trajectory" to nearly everyone who looks at BIG business...
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
Sounds about right.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: You're slowly taking "a similar trajectory" to nearly everyone who looks at BIG business...
It's the Ayn Rand "Selfishness is a virtue" ethos that is responsible for the state of the planet. She's not even an original thinker: Laissez-faire corporatism predates her writings, all she did was polish the turd.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Cockcroft's Law
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]