NSA Official Says It Might Have Been Nice If The Agency Had Handled The Public Disclosure Of The Section 215 Program
from the see-also:-snooze-v.-lose dept
Now that Edward Snowden has done all the leg work, the Intelligence Community is admitting that, yeah, maybe it should have been more upfront about the phone metadata collection. The soon-to-be-former NSA Deputy Director says it might have been better for the agency to be out ahead of the disclosures, rather than forced to play defense.
Richard Ledgett, who is retiring next month, said in an interview with Reuters that disclosing the secret program would have been difficult. But, he said, doing so might have mitigated the damage done by Snowden.
"That's one where I might have to say, yes," Ledgett said in his office at NSA headquarters in Fort Meade, Maryland. "That's one where maybe it would have been less shocking when Snowden did what he did."
Ledgett's not alone in feeling this way. Since the leaking began back in June 2013, several current and former officials have made similar statements. For one thing, controlling the disclosure means controlling the narrative. The IC could have pointed to several things in defense of the bulk domestic collection program, including:
a.) the lawfulness of the collection
b.) the rigorous oversight
c.) the strict compliance with FISA and the FISA court
d.) it's "just metadata"
Doing so might have headed off Snowden and other leakers. Possibly. At the very least, it would have bought the NSA some time and some narrative leeway before documents began being published showing:
a.) the collection's lawfulness was dubious at best
b.) the oversight was a joke
c.) the FISA court routinely discovered abuse by the NSA
d.) metadata exposes quite a bit of a person's life, actually.
Not quite as straightforward were Ledgett's comments on the Section 702 program, which provides backdoor domestic searches for a variety of government agencies, as well as harvests millions of communications from internet backbones. During the run-up to the Section 215 reauthorization two years ago, it sometimes appeared the NSA was willing to make deep compromises on the telephone metadata program in order to spare the internet collection the same sort of Congressional scrutiny.
Since 2011, oversight committee members (well, just a couple of them, actually) have been demanding an estimate of the amount of American communications incidentally-collected by the NSA with this program. Six years later, there have been promises made but none kept. At this point, Ledgett is just another IC official making promises no one seems to have any intent of keeping.
Privacy advocates have repeatedly demanded that the government share an estimate of how many Americans are ensnared by programs authorized under Section 702.
Intelligence officials have declined to do so. But Ledgett, in remarks earlier Tuesday at a forum sponsored by the Aspen Institute, said "yes" when asked if an estimate would be provided before year end.
We'll see. Deadlines have been ignored in the past and Ledgett's on his way out the door, so these are promises he can't be held responsible for not keeping.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: disclosure, ed snowden, mass surveillance, nsa, richard ledgett, section 215
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
And they will keep ignoring the law and their supposed bosses as long as nobody is severely punished (jailed until the demands are met). If one steals and gets away even if everybody knows he/she stole something what's going to prevent them from repeating it forever? Nothing.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Snowden's place in history
Joe McCarthy repeatedly lied, destroying the careers of truly patriotic citizens. His name became descriptive of the evils of the whole era. I'm wondering if Clapper's phrase "least untruthful" will be remembered as the emblematic phrase of this era.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
That's called "spin". He doesn't truly believe that they should have revealed the program, he just wants to look good after they got caught with their hand in the cookie jar.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
A lot of the scandal was blown up by the people around NSA (judges/politicians) starting to question if the system works, which is absolute poison for a secret service. Arguable NSA is by definition breaking the wall between domestic/foreign secret services. Historically such a combination has been a system with kingmaking powers and therefore a real threat to democracy.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Dishonesty now or later
Given they would have been lying either way, I'm not sure how effective their damage control would have been had they been more proactive.
Sure they would have been able to get their version/lies out first, allowing them to better shape the narrative, but so long as the leaks still happened they still would have been dealing with evidence that contradicted what they were saying, as I don't imagine they would have been any more honest going first rather than reacting. The leaks were bad enough PR for them on their own, but their response to the leaks, doubling down and getting caught out on lie after lie after lie really did a number on their credibility, and I don't see that changing either way it went down.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
I would believe him...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
The damage was done in the creation and and purpose of these programs, no matter what agency or nation
Pratt
[ link to this | view in chronology ]