After Bill Gates Backs Open Access, Steve Ballmer Discovers The Joys Of Open Data
from the who's-up-for-some-open-source,now? dept
A few months ago, we noted that the Gates Foundation has emerged as one of the leaders in requiring the research that it funds to be released as open access and open data -- an interesting application of the money that Bill Gates made from closed-source software. Now it seems that his successor as Microsoft CEO, Steve Ballmer, has had a similar epiphany about openness. Back in 2001, Ballmer famously called GNU/Linux "a cancer". Although he later softened his views on software somewhat, that was largely because he optimistically claimed that the threat to Microsoft from free software was "in the rearview mirror". Not really: today, the Linux-based Android has almost two orders of magnitude more market share than Windows Phone. However, there's one area of openness that Ballmer seems to have embraced whole-heartedly for his new project USAFacts, which launched this week -- open data:
USAFacts is a new data-driven portrait of the American population, our government's finances, and government's impact on society. We are a non-partisan, not-for-profit civic initiative and have no political agenda or commercial motive. We provide this information as a free public service and are committed to maintaining and expanding it in the future.
We rely exclusively on publicly available government data sources. We don’t make judgments or prescribe specific policies. Whether government money is spent wisely or not, whether our quality of life is improving or getting worse -- that's for you to decide. We hope to spur serious, reasoned, and informed debate on the purpose and functions of government. Such debate is vital to our democracy. We hope that USAFacts will make a modest contribution toward building consensus and finding solutions.
In addition to allowing a wide range of public data sets to be queried using a site-specific search engine, USAFacts also offers synoptic views:
an annual report, a summary report, and a "10-K" modeled on the document public companies submit annually to the SEC for transparency and accountability to their investors.
In an age where "fake news," AKA lies, are common currency, and where the Trump administration is making government more, not less, opaque, Ballmer's philanthropic, fact-based endeavor is particularly welcome. It's also nice to see him following Gates and implicitly acknowledging that open is more powerful than closed.
Follow me @glynmoody on Twitter or identi.ca, and +glynmoody on Google+
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: bill gates, open access, open data, steve ballmer
Companies: usafacts
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Heck, what was it, around 2005 that we started to roll over onto Linux - in "I'm a real boy" corporate time mode? There would be no "cloud" scale without it. I can't see how any e-economy could possibly flourish otherwise.
And for what it's worth Android is just one side of a coin toss. I still believe WebOS(imho) was more pure and more fun and boy don't I wish it was OSS. "Piss off, I'll run whatever I want. My phone, my adventure."
.. aaand now you got me onto the ISP donkeys. Holding up the got. damn. show. ahgain. The entire bloody thing is resting on their shoulders and we get Pai. Whelp, I guess we're just a bunch of schleps so fuck us. Gee, thanks mister. You nefarious ignorant bastard. Ride it now, bitch, because the storm in coming.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Fact based almost never is
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Full disclosure?
The goal appears noble. It however looks more like something that can easily be twisted to tell whatever narrative they want to tell.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Full disclosure?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
All sources have an inherent bias
Government is biased to state funded institutions and the people attracted to government always have a bias of the use of coercive force to get funding. Large businesses like the coerciveness of government to get their way.
Non government entities such as individuals may make different, and also valid solutions that get short shrift when large data powerful entities produce ideas, boundaries and studies that conflict with the interests of the state or large corporation.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: All sources have an inherent bias
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: All sources have an inherent bias
Everything you think you "know" with certainty... is unverifiable, ultimately. You deal only with "relative" facts, based upon arbitrary but common assumptions (in your mind).
The only thing you know with certainty is that your consciousness exists (Cogito Ergo Sum). All else you perceive ... could well be illusory.
("Reality is an illusion, albeit a persistent one" -- Albert Einstein)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: All sources have an inherent bias
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Pull up the ladder after they're in the Tree House
You two have money to slosh around and take away opportunity from the next aspiring monopolist, just for the good of mankind as a whole. Have you no heart?!?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Pull up the ladder after they're in the Tree House
Good heavens! I'll be they have a monopoly on smart phones and social media too!
/s
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Friendly Hugs
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
>and have no political agenda or commercial motive.
Note this is coming from a man who gave buckets of money to back I-491, restricting the civil rights of Washington residents.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Ballmer is the cancer.
The truth is known, data is, or data is not.
The cancer always was the Ballmer as Ballmer is the cancer it is most basic form.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Except it's not really *open* data
In many ways, it's a black box - it tells you what they say the numbers say, but if you want to be certain, you don't have any way to query the data properly.
It's a useful start, but it's honestly hard to see it as $10m worth of a start. Three things that would improve it at once: 1) link back to the source material for each dataset; 2) show the working (and any conflicts in the data; 3) make the datasets downloadable in something other than PDF.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Ballmers Data
Check out smartprocure.us
[ link to this | view in chronology ]