AT&T Unveils A Fake 5G Network In The Hopes You'll Ignore T-Mobile Is Kicking Its Ass
from the 5G-is-whatever-I-say-it-is dept
To be clear: fifth generation (5G) wireless should be really impressive when it actually arrives, providing significantly faster mobile broadband speeds at lower latencies. The catch: the 5G standard hasn't even been created yet, and any real deployment of the ultra-fast technology isn't expected to even seriously begin until 2020. That hasn't stopped wireless carrier and hardware vendor marketing departments, which have been hyping the technology as the second coming for several years now. Sure, these salesmen don't know what 5G really even is yet, but they're pretty sure it's going to fix everything.
As these carriers rush to begin tests on the hardware and software advancements that may someday make up the 5G standard, the real yeoman's work is now being done in marketing. All of the big carriers are tripping over themselves, trying desperately to convince the public that they're going to be the first to offer the amazing new benefits 5G can provide. Verizon has traditionally been at the forefront of this hype, telling anyone who'll listen it hopes to offer gigabit speeds over wireless sometime this year (to a limited number of trial participants).
Not to be outdone, AT&T has upped the ante this week with a proclamation that the company is first to market with "5G Evolution." What is 5G evolution? It's a largely meaningless marketing term concocted by AT&T to describe 4x4 MIMO (multiple input, multiple output) antennas and 256 QAM technologies that can be used to make existing LTE networks faster. It really has nothing whatsoever to do with "5G," but you wouldn't know that from reading AT&T's marketing missives this week:
"AT&T* today announced 5G Evolution plans to pave the way to the next generation of faster speeds for its wireless customers with the latest devices in over 20 major metro areas by the end of this year. We continue to lay the foundation for our evolution to 5G while the 5G standards are being finalized."
"Our 5G Evolution in Austin gives our customers a taste of the future," said David Christopher, chief marketing officer, AT&T Entertainment Group. "With 5G Evolution from AT&T you don’t have to wait to experience endless entertainment possibilities on the next generation network when you have the latest devices."
Except you will wait. For some time. A closer look reveals that the trials are only currently available in a limited part of Austin, and only accessible from those that have one of two mobile devices: the Samsung Galaxy S8 or S8+. And while 4x4 MIMO and 256 QAM advancements are a useful improvement for existing networks, they're not really new, either. T-Mobile has been implementing the upgrades on its own network since last fall.
The features AT&T is calling "5G Evolution" have been live on T-Mobile since 2016. It's not even like this stuff is that new.
— David Ruddock (@RDR0b11) April 25, 2017
And again, this has absolutely nothing to do with "5G." So why are carriers like AT&T and Verizon pushing so hard to hype a technology that doesn't technically exist? For years both carriers justified their higher prices by claiming their networks offered users superior connectivity. But as T-Mobile has ramped up competition, gobbled up their frustrated customers and closed the network coverage and performance gap -- these companies have been forced to find some other way to justify what are fairly consistently some of the highest LTE broadband prices among all developed nations. Their solution for this justification gap? Good, old-fashioned hype.
With "4G" networks, we watched as carrier marketing departments slowly but surely convinced the ITU to let them call pretty much everything short of carrier pigeons 4G. Not to be outdone, you can expect the marketing bastardization of the term "5G" to be dramatically more misleading and annoying.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: 5g, 5g evolution, hype, marketing, wireless
Companies: at&t, t-mobile
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Any bets on AT&T et al being punished for lying? I bet 1 trillion they won't. What are you looking at?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Snapsave Android
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
You never hear the companies explain what the LTE in "4G LTE" stands for. Why? Because it means "Long-Term Evolution." In other words, "we'll get around to implementing 4G eventually, but for now here's the bits and pieces we've got working."
And now this?!?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
AT&T deserves a good public mocking for this.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Why does the FTC allow this flagrantly misleading labeling by AT&T? This isn't "confusion" between major beverage categories (i.e. beer fanciful labels being confused with similarly sounding wine fanciful labels), it is a false and misleading label within one (cellular communications) category. "Grape Nuts" is not from grapes, nor nuts. The FTC justified allowing "Grape Nuts" as a food description because it was considered "fanciful". There is nothing fanciful here about AT&T's marketing campaign. "5G Evolution" is designed to mislead.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
T-Mobile has been implementing the upgrades on its own network since last fall.
To be fair here, this is pretty brand spanking new for an infrastructure roll-out. Yes, T-Mobile got it out faster, but 6-8 months isn't very long at all when looking at regulated infrastructure project timelines.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Shannon's Law
Shannon's law is not optional, it applies regardless of technology, regardless of what the marketing department says, for ever. There is no substitute for putting up more and more radio towers, all hooked up with good old optical fibers, in trenches, in the ground. Of course, you could just do FTTP (Fibre To The Premises) and render all this messing about with 4G-5G-etc moot. But that would be too much like hard work, wouldn't it?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Shannon's Law
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Shannon's Law
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Dial 611
For help with your telephone service, dial 611.
But it really should be dial 666 to reach AT&T.
AT&T: How may I abuse you today?
Me: My 5G seems to be five times slower than 4G?
AT&T: That's what our 5G is supposed to be. Did you read the fine print on page 223 of your service agreement?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
What Is AT&T?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: What Is AT&T?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
"Sure you can take the supercharged race-car for a spin, just remember if you go faster than 40 mph you'll be fined."
No discussion about blazing fast theoretical speeds would be complete without bringing up the huge, massive, and industry caused flaw that makes it an entirely moot point:
Usage caps.
You could have a 100 gig per second connection and it wouldn't do you any good as you'd almost immediately slam right into the usage caps so many of the companies in the industry love so much, such that you'd either be paying vast sums in 'overage' fees and/or quickly have your connection throttled down to the point where you might as well still be using dial-up.
Beyond the fact that they're hyping something that doesn't exist at this point, even if it did they've ensured that the extra speed is useless as anyone who actually put it to use to any real extent would be swiftly and harshly penalized for doing so.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
CMS
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]