Judge Orders Gov't To Stop Screwing Around And Hand Over Docs In Long-Running Surveillance Case
from the doing-nothing-24/7 dept
One of the longest-running lawsuits over NSA surveillance is still no closer to a final decision, but at least we may get to take a look at a few more Section 702 documents. Jewel vs. NSA (filed in 2008) predates the Snowden leaks by five years and, judging by the speed of the government's responses, will probably hit the 10-year mark before everything is sorted out.
The EFF reports a production order has been handed down by the court, which will hopefully light a fire under the recalcitrant government.
In 2016 the Court had ordered that the plaintiffs could seek discovery. After over a year of government stonewalling, the Court has now ordered the government to comply with a narrowed set of discovery requests by August 9, 2017. The discovery is aimed at whether plaintiffs' communications were subject to the mass NSA program tapping into the Internet backbone called Upstream. The court also ordered the government to file as much of its responses as possible on the public court docket.
Whether or not most of these documents will make their way into the public eye remains to be seen. But the court's order [PDF] contains a hypothetical indicating it's expecting a lot of production.
By 6-2-17: Government counsel to inform the Court if, hypothetically, a career law clerk was granted security clearance, would she be able to view all documents, including those already produced in classified submissions.
The court will still handle some of the discovery behind closed doors, but it's hoping to keep itself from being buried in paperwork. The order tells the government to move forward with its production in phases. It also asks the plaintiffs to narrow their discovery request "significantly." By August, the court would like to have this wrapped up and the case moving forward again.
Of course, this order has been delivered to a government that has argued no one has standing to challenge domestic surveillance and one that conveniently interpreted the Section 215 shutdown as permission to destroy evidence. The DOJ will continue to do everything it can to stem the flow of information to the public. It already spent a year ignoring the court's production order. I'm sure it will find a way to turn two months of discovery obligations into a much longer order -- perhaps even long enough to keep more Section 702 info out of the public's hands until after it obtains the year-end renewal it so badly wants.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: jewel v. nsa, nsa, surveillance
Companies: eff
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
“Evil and good at what we do” does have better optics than “evil and awful at what we do”.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
One of the major problems with the 'Collect it all, sort through it at our leisure' mindset that infects intel agencies is that when they actually do get important information it's almost certain to be drowned out by all the useless stuff.
When you target your investigations and know what you're looking for you're likely to realize immediately when you run across something important and can act on it in time.
When you're grabbing everything you can get your hands on 'just in case' then the overwhelming majority of what you come across is likely to be useless, and if you do manage to accidentally trip over something of importance spotting it in the pile in time to make use of it is more a matter of dumb luck.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
It means that one a terrorist emerges, the intel agencies can retroactively surveil them. Root through their phone, email and social media records and find out everyone they've been communicating with.
Which lets them quickly round up the terrorist's support network and prevent future attacks. But it's too late to stop the initial attack even if there were signs and warnings that seem obvious in hindsight.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re:
Gather everything is almost certainly distracting the Intelligence services from carrying out a targeted investigation when someone is b ought to their attention, and carrying out the much more boring task of watching someone do ordinary things so that they can initiate action when they start to do extraordinary things.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Tactical Pants
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Why do the Courts
If the last few years have taught us anything, it is that all agencies hold themselves "above the law".
Court orders FBI; FBI ignores order - Court Orders DoJ - DoJ laughs.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Why do the Courts
Ruth Bader Ginsburg eats the DoJ. Woman inherits the Earth.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Why do the Courts
Hey now, the judge could possibly maybe consider handing out a sternly worded letter if they ignore him/her, you better believe that government agencies are terrified of being on the receiving end of one of those.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Jailtime
As to the official secrets defense, the Government must approve a court employee (acceptable to both sides) who is read onto all applicable programs, and able to obtain the source documents. No more we can't give it to you because it's a secret defense.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Jailtime
This time, though, it looks like the court might be inclined to draw an adverse inference, should the government continue stonewalling.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Or, if by some miracle that section is not renewed, they will take it as a cue to repeat their Section 215 destruction-of-evidence procedure. Obstruction has worked out well for them in every context so far, so they have very little incentive not to "accidentally" lose more incriminating evidence.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Slow learners
"...as much of its responses as possible..."?!! Judges must be the slowest learners ever. You give the government an option and "as much as possible" always translates to 0.000000000000000%.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]