EFF Sues FBI For Refusing To Turn Over Documents About Its Geek Squad Informants
from the best-buys,-best-friends dept
A child porn indictment in California has led to a full-fledged examination of the FBI's use of "private searches." Private searches, performed by citizens, can be used to instigate investigations and obtain warrants. In this case, the private searches were performed by Best Buy Geek Squad members, who came across alleged child porn images while fixing the defendant's computer.
Private searches during computer repairs are normal. But they're not roughly analogous to searches performed with a warrant. Companies that repair electronic devices are legally required to report discovered child porn to law enforcement. What they're not supposed to do, however, is dig through devices they're repairing in hopes of finding something illegal.
Most techs don't go looking for child porn. But the FBI's close relationship with Best Buy turned private searches into searches performed by paid informants. Once government money is introduced into the equation, the search can no longer be considered "private." The introduction of cash rewards also skews the incentives, possibly encouraging Geek Squad members to spend more time looking for illicit images than focusing on the repair job at hand.
Documents uncovered in this case strongly suggest the FBI has been using Best Buy repair center techs as confidential informants, paying them for their discoveries while claiming these warrantless, secondhand searches are nothing more than completely legal "private searches."
The EFF wants to know what the FBI knows about its long-running Best Buy partnership. The FBI isn't nearly as interested in making this information public. It sent a FOIA request to the FBI in early February. The FBI's first response was a Glomar. From the EFF's FOIA lawsuit [PDF]:
By letter to Plaintiff dated April 18, 2017, the FBI denied EFF’s request for agency records. The FBI stated, inter alia, that “it is the FBI’s policy to neither confirm nor deny the existence of any records which would tend to indicate or reveal whether an individual or organization is of investigatory interest to the FBI.”
The EFF immediately appealed this determination. Since then, the FBI has yet to respond. The EFF's lawsuit seeks a better response to its FOIA request, as well as a ruling finding in favor of its requested fee waiver. The EFF's decision to move forward with a FOIA lawsuit is the unfortunate result of the government's disinterest in fulfilling its FOIA obligations. There's hardly any action a citizen can take to speed up this process. Lawsuits are only marginally better than firing off reminder emails. Unfortunately, they're also a lot more expensive.
There's a good chance these documents -- should they ever be released by the FBI -- will show this sort of thing isn't limited to Best Buy repair centers.
We think that the FBI's use of Geek Squad informants is not an isolated event. Rather, it is a regular investigative tactic law enforcement employ to obtain digital evidence without first getting a warrant as the Fourth Amendment generally requires.
This bears watching. The FBI loves parallel construction and law enforcement in general loves anything that allows it to bypass obtaining warrants. Turning repair crews into informants serves these interests well.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: 4th amendment, fbi, foia, geek squad, informants, private searches
Companies: best buy, eff
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Planting Evidence
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Planting Evidence
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Planting Evidence
The chain of custody should be considered instantly broken in such cases, unfortunately there can be a rather large divide between 'should be' and 'is' at times.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Planting Evidence
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
look on the bright side...
It will start to get around to be nice or risk becoming a sex offender!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: look on the bright side...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
An idea
For example, if you won't divulge the information about Geek Squad members and payments from the FBI, courts will assume all cases related to Geek Squad discoveries are illegal searches and all of them are thrown out with prejudice.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: An idea
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: An idea
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
State Actors
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: State Actors
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Standung
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Standung
FTFY
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Standung
You didn't fix anything. You just added slant. Why not address the issue of standing?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Standung
What a load. One doesn't have to "fix" a situation in order to comment on it.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Standung
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Standung
EFF has had cases kicked out before in similar circumstances because they were unable to produce a single person who was impacted by government action. This case seems to be about the same with EFF not really representing anyone except themselves but they don't show that they have been affected.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Standung
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Standung
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Standung
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Or auto mechanics for finding contraband in cars.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fair_use#U.S._fair_use_factors
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Fishing For Facts
I am starting to think that EFF is working for the headline "EFF sues government" and not really worrying about the end result as much. It's all about getting your attention.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Fishing For Facts
So how's that sense of irony working out for you, My_Name_Here?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Or as it's known when someone else does it, "perjury."
[ link to this | view in chronology ]