Comcast/NBC Caught Intentionally Misspelling Show Names To Help Hide Sagging Nielsen Ratings

from the obvious-integrity dept

Thu, Jul 13th 2017 10:40am — Karl Bode

The cable and broadcast industry goes to some amusing lengths to downplay cord cutting and streaming competition's impact on ratings and subscriber totals. Initially the impulse was just to insist that cord cutting wasn't real. When the data made outright denial impossible, the industry began insisting cord cutting was only something done by irrelevant nobodies living in mom's basement or Millennials who would see the error of their ways once they procreated. Of course data repeatedly showed that these people were the norm, and now we're looking at potentially one of the biggest quarterly subscriber losses in television history.

As ratings have reflected the industry's dying cash cow, they've also taken consistent aim at viewership measurement systems as well. A bone of particular contention has been Nielsen, which is stuck between trying to accurately measure the damage and cater to myopic cable and broadcast clients that can't hear well with their heads buried firmly in the sand. A few years ago, Nielsen was forced to stop publicizing the rise in broadband-only (not TV) households. More recently, ESPN tried to publicly shame Nielsen when the company accurately highlighted the massive subscriber exodus happening at the channel.

But the cable and broadcast industry has been engaged in some other notable shenanigans to try and protect the illusion that everything is going swimmingly. The Wall Street Journal indicates that the industry has increasingly been going so far as to intentionally misspell their programs in program listings. Why? Because when they know a show is going to see a ratings dip, listing it under another name prevents its core listing from being impacted in the Nielsen ratings:

"That explains the appearance of "NBC Nitely News," which apparently aired on the Friday of Memorial Day weekend this year, when a lot of people were away from their TVs. The retitling of “NBC Nightly News” fooled Nielsen’s automated system, which listed “Nitely” as a separate show. Hiding the May 26 program from Nielsen dramatically improved the show’s average viewership that week," the report adds. "Instead of falling further behind first-place rival 'ABC World News Tonight,' NBC news narrowed the gap."

The Journal goes on to note how this has been a sort of "open secret" in the industry for several years, but as cord cutting has begun to accelerate, its use has increased. At one point, NBC intentionally misspelled "NBC Nitely News" every night for a week. And all of this appears to be happening with the blessing of Nielsen, which again tries to walk a tightrope between being taken seriously as a rating metric system and keeping paying cable and broadcast clients happy with manufactured tales from fantasy land.

For its part, NBC issued a statement that features a number of words, but at no point addresses the issue at hand:

"As is standard industry practice, our broadcast is retitled when there are pre-emptions and inconsistencies or irregularities in the schedule, which can include holiday weekends and special sporting events,” a show spokesman said."

Granted that sounds so much nicer than "we intentionally misspell our own programs to try and pretend our industry isn't facing a massive revolution we're ill-prepared for."

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team

Filed Under: news, nitely news, ratings
Companies: comcast, nbc, nielsen

37 Comments

If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...

Reader Comments

The First Word

“

Fraud By Any Name...

"And all of this appears to be happening with the blessing of Nielsen, which again tries to walk a tightrope between being taken seriously as a rating metric system and keeping paying cable and broadcast clients happy with manufactured tales from fantasy land. "

Or as we should more accurately describe it, "a concerted conspiracy to continue bilking marketers by misrepresenting the actual decline in TV, cable and broadcast, viewership, and thus a large, real reduction in the values of advertising placements on these media distribution channels."

tl;dr: collusive fraud against ad buyers.

—Anonymous Coward

”

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread

Anonymous Coward, 13 Jul 2017 @ 10:53am

TV Executive #1: How did we do in the Neilsen ratings last week, Bob?

TV Executive #2: Not bad. An average week for us. But you should have seen how we did in the Neelson ratings. 200 million households per show! And people like to pretend cord cutting is real.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Anonymous Coward, 13 Jul 2017 @ 11:05am
  
  Re:
  And Kneel, son, was even better!
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 13 Jul 2017 @ 10:53am

Are you saying
that NBC has been caught with "fake views"?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Anonymous Coward, 13 Jul 2017 @ 11:31am
  
  Re: Are you saying
  alternative ratings
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Anonymous Coward, 14 Jul 2017 @ 7:13am
  
  Re: Are you saying
  Exactly! Come on people we all know NBC is Fake News, of course they add some makeup to their ratings too.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Whoever, 13 Jul 2017 @ 11:05am

Short sighted because of TIVO.
The other effect of renaming is that it will reduce actual viewership. All those TIVO users will find that the program has not recorded, so fewer actual viewers. Also, if this happens in the middle of a story arc, viewers who can't find the missing episode may not bother with later episodes.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Anonymous Coward, 13 Jul 2017 @ 11:17am
  
  Re: Short sighted because of TIVO.
  True, but they're doing this to programs that they already expect to perform poorly. Assuming they do a decent job of predicting which programs will do poorly, reducing the numerator (number of viewers for this episode) doesn't hurt them nearly as much as not reducing the denominator (number of times this series aired). Depending on the formula Nielsen uses, it might be the case that the misnamed episode would need to do better than average for this practice to have any adverse impact on the network's numbers. If the program gets exactly average viewing, including or excluding it has no effect. If it gets below average viewing, excluding it helps. If it gets above average viewing, excluding it hurts. What are the odds that they would get above-average viewing on a night that history says is routinely below-average (due to holidays, competing big-name events, etc.)?
  
  As an aside, as a PVR user, the latter has happened to me. I have one series (that I can recall offhand) on indefinite hiatus (with a slowly climbing chance I'll just delete all remaining episodes unwatched) because one episode midseason failed to record and there was no way to get it from other legal sources: streaming didn't have it, no reruns airing on any channel, etc.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - Hugh Jasohl (profile), 13 Jul 2017 @ 11:31am
    
    Re: Re: Short sighted because of TIVO.
    What show and which episode? This is the internet and people might point to a copy.
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Carrie (profile), 13 Jul 2017 @ 11:14am

True Story. My friend's 5-year-old, raised on iPads with Netflix, said this yesterday:

"You know how Grandma's TV has something called...channels? Yeah, I think it's called channels. And there are breaks where they play commercials?"
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
stderric (profile), 13 Jul 2017 @ 11:32am

Next headline:

"ABC Has Best Nielsen Week In Years, Apparently Has No Shows Whatsoever"
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Hugh Jasohl (profile), 13 Jul 2017 @ 11:35am

Being force fed commercials
Consumers adapt to the ever growing pressure of ads. We have shows split up even when we pay a premium to watch them in many formats. Smart consumers see the options and go with the one that inconvenience them the least overall. Traditional cable TV seems to be trying to wring blood out of a stone with the remaining subscribers they have left. Two more years is the maximum that this state will last before it fragments and consumers benefit from lower costs and more choices, with very few, if any ads.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Cowardly Lion, 14 Jul 2017 @ 4:48am
  
  Re: Being force fed commercials
  On a similar note, I gave up with physical media after getting thoroughly cheesed off with the unskippable FBI and Interpol anti-piracy warnings.
  
  Naturally having laid out 10-15€, I resented being treated like a crook.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Anonymous Coward, 14 Jul 2017 @ 7:19am
  
  Re: Being force fed commercials
  Yes it is ridiculous the mere existence of ads in subscription-based TV, I mean the whole point of subscription was to avoid the ads and here we are (at least some of us) paying for a subscription that is full of ads (and many other hidden costs).
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 13 Jul 2017 @ 11:42am

Money Talks...
and the bullshit gets up and walks...

There is no institution of man immune.
Science, Education, News & General Media, Government, Law Enforcement, Courts, your son and your daughter are all subject to doing things...

when the price is right
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
SirWired (profile), 13 Jul 2017 @ 11:47am

I'll take Shortsighted Thinking for $1,000 Alex...
Yes, Nielsen, your direct customers (the ones paying the bills) are the networks you collect statistics on. But THEIR customers (the advertisers) are the eventual consumers of the data.

If the advertisers lose confidence in the data, they'll get their data from somebody else (instead of letting the networks pass it on), and it's unlikely that source is going to end up being Nielsen.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Thad, 13 Jul 2017 @ 12:12pm
  
  Re: I'll take Shortsighted Thinking for $1,000 Alex...
  But who else is there? I don't see a burgeoning competitive market for analyzing broadcast/cable TV viewership numbers, with a lot of new entrants eager to get a slice of that pie.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - Jeff Green (profile), 14 Jul 2017 @ 2:33am
    
    Re: Re: I'll take Shortsighted Thinking for $1,000 Alex...
    Nielson are only market leaders in North America, elsewhere Kantar Media dominate, there are two or three other players too.
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
    - Thad, 14 Jul 2017 @ 10:08am
      
      Re: Re: Re: I'll take Shortsighted Thinking for $1,000 Alex...
      Good to know, but do they have a foothold in America, and if not, do they want one?
      [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Hugh Jasohl (profile), 13 Jul 2017 @ 11:49am

Trust Vaccuum
Since Nielsen is no longer trustworthy, it sounds like we need a new 3rd party aggregate counter to keep track of various entertainment trends. It should include viewership from youtube channels, netflix, amazon, and other internet only systems along with cable, over the air and none of the above. We should be able to see popular music trends and music videos as well.

When a system starts being manipulated, we can't trust it to reform itself any longer.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Thad, 13 Jul 2017 @ 12:15pm
  
  Re: Trust Vaccuum
  But websites don't need a sampling organization to determine their viewership numbers; they already have them. What benefit would they see in sharing or publishing those numbers?
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
TechDescartes (profile), 13 Jul 2017 @ 12:05pm

A Better Mousetrap
If the ratings are that bad, wouldn't it be more effective for NBC just to rename the show "ABC World News Tonight"?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Arthur Moore (profile), 13 Jul 2017 @ 12:17pm
  
  Re: A Better Mousetrap
  Not really, because the ratings aren't all bad. Nightly News probably has reasonable ratings, but they wanted it just a bit higher. So, they used the intentional misspelling to not have a weekend that they knew would have bad ratings counted.
  
  Of course, as has been mentioned this screws anyone with a DVR, since the show doesn't get recorded. It's also relatively easy for Nielsen to fix. Just add a step where the data is cleaned up. Possibly have someone set up a mapping by hand to re-name the shows.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - JoeCool (profile), 13 Jul 2017 @ 2:01pm
    
    Re: Re: A Better Mousetrap
    The way to deal with that is that any show previously submitted but not officially canceled will get a 0 if not resubmitted. Do that a few times and they'll correct their spelling rather quickly, as low ratings are better than 0.
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
    - Anonymous Coward, 14 Jul 2017 @ 7:27am
      
      Re: Re: Re: A Better Mousetrap
      Agree, but that is exactly the point about Nielsen, why haven't they fixed it? After all, the industry itself has admitted that it is an industry-wide practice that has been going on for years, and Nielsen has chosen all those years to run along with such maneuvers, proof of their guilt and corruption.
      [ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Anonymous Coward, 14 Jul 2017 @ 7:23am
  
  Re: A Better Mousetrap
  No because of one word, Branding. They already have a brand, a name that is giving them (at least some) ratings and money.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 13 Jul 2017 @ 1:20pm

Fraud By Any Name...
"And all of this appears to be happening with the blessing of Nielsen, which again tries to walk a tightrope between being taken seriously as a rating metric system and keeping paying cable and broadcast clients happy with manufactured tales from fantasy land. "

Or as we should more accurately describe it, "a concerted conspiracy to continue bilking marketers by misrepresenting the actual decline in TV, cable and broadcast, viewership, and thus a large, real reduction in the values of advertising placements on these media distribution channels."

tl;dr: collusive fraud against ad buyers.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
YoursFaithfully, 13 Jul 2017 @ 3:40pm

"As is standard industry practice, our broadcast is retitled when there are pre-emptions and inconsistencies or irregularities in the schedule, which can include holiday weekends and special sporting events,” a show spokesman said."

MON,20h: NOW ON NBC, GAME OF BONES!

TUE,21h: NOW ON NBC, GAME OF ZONES!

WED,18h: NOW ON NBC, GAME OF CONES!

THU,19h: NOW ON NBC, GAME OF DRONES!

FRI,22h: NOW ON NBC, GAME OF MOANS!

SAT,24: NOW ON NBC, GAME OF LOANS!

SUN,1h: NOW ON NBC, GAME OF CLONES!

Yeeeeeahhhh ... no ... because ... like ... IT'S STILL THE SAME SHOW, GODDANGIT!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Anonymous Coward (profile), 13 Jul 2017 @ 4:03pm

Drop?
I am having a hard time understanding how a misspelling of a show name helps. If the show watched has the correct name, then the misspelled show get a zero rating, and the correctly spelled show name gets whatever the viewership was. If the show watched has a misspelled name, how can anyone claim it is the same show? How does the misspelling of the name actually help? Are the advertisers fooled? Are the networks fooled? Is Neilsen fooled?

Maybe, maybe, the end consumer is fooled, but other than paying the cable bill, or not as the case may be, who is actually fooled? The money lays with the advertisers, through the networks, who will be caught at their gamesmanship.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Dan Audy (profile), 13 Jul 2017 @ 10:52pm
  
  Re: Drop?
  The money is with the advertisers who pay a rate based on Nielens average viewership numbers. By cutting out a poor performing episode from the 'average' calculation it creates an artificially inflated value that the network gets paid for commercials during that show. If a news show that airs 5 days a week normally gets 500,000 viewers but only 250,000 viewers when scheduled against a football game 'misspelling' the shows name means that the rate they are being paid for commercial time during a week with a football game is at the 500,000 viewers/show rate (2 mil / 4 shows) rather than 450,000 viewers/show (2.25 mil / 5 shows) or roughly 11% more than they should be getting paid based on the contracts with the advertisers.
  
  It is the same strategy that some schools use by encouraging poor performers to drop out school to artificially inflate their test scores on the standardized testing. By eliminating (through unethical means) the worst performers the reported average goes up despite not actually doing a better job.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Anonymous Coward, 14 Jul 2017 @ 7:31am
  
  Re: Drop?
  The misspell the episodes with lowest ratings so those do not count to the average rating calculation.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - Anonymous Coward, 14 Jul 2017 @ 7:32am
    
    Re: Re: Drop?
    They misspell...
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 13 Jul 2017 @ 4:30pm

how is this not a felony?
fraud
misrepresentation
truth in advertising
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- PaulT (profile), 14 Jul 2017 @ 1:05am
  
  Re: how is this not a felony?
  At the very least, I'd expect it to be a breach of contract, so it would be interesting to see how the advertisers respond to this news.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
David, 14 Jul 2017 @ 1:02am

What do you expect?
They are consistently misspelling "net neuralgy" too.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 14 Jul 2017 @ 7:29am

THIS for lol of the week.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Not Drew Carey, 14 Jul 2017 @ 1:11pm

Welcome to Neilsen ratings, where everything's made up and the points don't matter.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
John85851 (profile), 17 Jul 2017 @ 11:13am

Why stop with Nitely News
If the networks were smart, they'd just rename the show to "The News". Then when every network does this, "The News" becomes the largest-watched show in history.
Of course, Neilson would show that it aired at 6:00pm. 7:00pm, and 11:00pm on every channel, but why nit-pick?

Or Neilson could figure out that the same news show airs every weekday at the same time, no matter what the network decides to call it, and then average the ratings together.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]