Sex History Educational Site Wants To Know If It's Going To Be Bricked Up Behind UK's Porn Wall
from the are-you-old-enough-to-LEARN? dept
As the UK's porn filter move from "voluntold" to mandatory, questions are being raised (again) about the potential for overblocking. As is the case with any filtering system, things that should be allowed to go through sometimes end up caught in the netting.
In addition to the opt-out porn filtering system in place at UK internet service providers, the government is also demanding any site that meets its vague definition of pornographic verify users' ages before allowing them access. This will apparently be tied to credit cards and/or mobile phones, so the government can strip porn viewers of anonymity it will be slightly more difficult for the under-18 crowd to avail themselves of over-18 web goodies. (But not really.)
Because the blockaded content is so vaguely defined, education sites -- like the Whores of Yore site -- are likely to end up on the government's ID-please naughty list.
Whores of Yore is a website, run by academic Kate Lister, which describes itself as follows: “We are proudly sex-positive. An inter-disciplinary, pro-sex worker rights hub, dedicated to exploring the history of human sexuality and challenging shame and stigma.”
The site is slightly NSFW but not really the sort of thing that should be targeted when targeting porn. Unfortunately, the UK government prefers shotguns to sniper rifles and is apparently comfortable with collateral damage. The provision -- tied up with lots of other stupid/bad stuff in the Digital Economy Act -- says anything covered the government's R18 and 18 certificates (roughly XXX and R-rated, respectively) will need to be blocked with a government-ordained registration wall. Harder porn is covered by the R18. The 18 certification covers simple things like nudity, if the government decides the content is "titillating."
There certainly are some titillating things at Whores of Yore, but there's also a great deal of educational material. Concerned her site might be blocked, Lister asked the blocking government body directly for its view on her site's content. Results were inconclusive.
So Kate contacted the BBFC, the UK’s soon-to-be Internet censor with a simple question: will she be a criminal, and will her site be blocked, under the new regime? After all, these rules are set to become law within a few months, and have been under discussion for years. Predictably, the BBFC responded to say they simply can’t answer:
“Work in this area has not yet begun and so we are not in a position to advice [sic] you on your website. Pages 23 and 24 of our Classification Guidelines detail the standards applied when classifying sex works at 18 and R18 however and may be of interest to you.”
In other words, the censoring agency has no idea. It simply asks questioners to read the same guidelines it will apparently be enforcing. As Lister says, reading the guidelines in hopes of finding clear delineations in content regulation is "about as useful as a chocolate dildo." Given this non-response, it's safe to assume when the blockade goes live, writers might need to search for less titillating metaphors if they're not behind an age verification wall.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: porn, porn filter, porn wall, sex education, uk, websites
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
It's worth clarifying a few things here, for the non-British audience.
When dealing with DVDs, most titles (there are some narrow exceptions) have to be classified by the BBFC. The two highest ratings available are 18 and R18 (the work can also be rejected outright, and it's illegal to supply a non-certificated non-exempt work in the UK). 18 is roughly equivalent to R, but stricter in implementation (unlike the US R rating, the age limit is a hard 18, you can't get younger people into a cinema to see an 18 movie with a parent, for example).
R18, on the other hand, can only be legally supplied in specially licenced premises (usually sex shops) with extra restrictions on how they operate. In the past this has meant porn, but there's some very different rules to the US and some wooly implementations that have been introduced over the last couple of decades - for example, some hardcore porn used to be banned at even the R18 level, while some art movies have been accepted uncut at the 18 level despite containing hardcore footage (e.g. some versions of Caligula, Baise-Moi, The Idiots, etc.).
Obviously, now we have a number of issues with how the government plan to implement this with regard to websites, but I think the latter point is the most concerning. While the BBFC do have some hard guidelines for what is allowed at each level, some of it is very subjective and subject to the whims of whoever's in charge at a particular time. The owner of this website could find themselves at the wrong end of legality for any reason at any time.
The whole thing is idiotic, and essentially a new version of the video nasties witch hunt that utterly failed the Tories in the 80s (though as someone who grew up at the time, I appreciated the list of "must have" titles to hunt down as a teenager - them being banned really helped the thrill of the hunt!). It will fail just as badly, but I suppose it helps as a distraction from all the other ways they're destroying the country in the meantime.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
There's also the point you raised so well: porn is widely available on the internet from sources the UK government can have limited control at best. So yeah, it's just fireworks.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
I'm perfectly capable of complaining about more than one thing at once! ;)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
Certain types of works, yes. Always has been, which is why it's been so important for the US to ensure that freedom of speech transcends media. Look up the 1959 Obscene Publications Act and its use against Lady Chatterley's Lover and the 1984 Video Recordings Act and its use during the video nasties scare for examples - and both of those acts were intended to clarify and improve rules already in existence, not introduce new forms of censorship. Whenever the Tories are in power, they will tend to bow more toward the Mary Whitehouse way of thinking, which is not positive for a free society.
When Orwell was writing 1984, and when Moore wrote V For Vendetta to update it to the Thatcher era, they were basing it on things that were really happening. Recent developments in China are not new in the UK, or in many other countries, they usually just happen to be better as making it less obviously authoritarian.
"There's also the point you raised so well: porn is widely available on the internet from sources the UK government can have limited control at best"
As mentioned, I was a teenager during the late 80s/early 90s and the list of "video nasties" produced by the 1984 VRA were something I was very interested in collecting. I was able to get hold of most of them on VHS via post. Online blocks won't be any more effective, especially if the target is "everything pornographic" rather than "these specific 39 or 72 films".
But, "fireworks" or not, there's some very real problems that will be caused by these kinds of moves, be it censorship of otherwise legitimate material (such as the educational content in question here) or other unintended consequences.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
Beyond that, the age limits are hard limits. A 14 year old cannot legally get in to see a movie rated 15, a 17 year old cannot get into see an 18 rated movie.
The comparison between R and 18 therefore tends to be variable. It used to be that most movies that were released as an R in the US would be released as an 18 in the UK. In recent years, distributors have tended to cut the movie slightly to get a 15, or the BBFC's stance has softened to the point where they don't mind passing things as a 15, so long as the violence isn't too extreme and there's no explicit sex or sexual violence. So, Deadpool was a 15 uncut in the UK, while some films that were traditionally released as 18 have been reclassified as 15 when resubmitted (sometimes with hilarious effect - some films that were banned as video nasties are not avaialable uncut as 15 rated!).
I hope that all makes sense. The BBFC's official website (http://bbfc.co.uk/) is an excellent resource.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
At the same time our lawyers got nervous about outgoing emails and liability so had a disclaimer automatically appended to every email which included the phrase that the "distribution was restricted to the intended recipients".
We spend a few days in happy ignorance that every single one of our our outgoing emails was being blocked.
That was fixed but we noticed certain emails were not getting through to us. We eventually worked out that every time someone replied to our email, it included the disclaimer and so got automatically trashed.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
They could fine the card owner whenever their card used that way, like how they fine vehicle owners when someone (whether the owner or not) runs a red light in the vehicle. But why would the kids be looking for British porn specifically, rather than using the millions of other sites?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
They could require credit card companies to detect and block "suspicious" uses of the card for verification. They wouldn't necessarily define what that means, they'd just leave it vague so credit card companies would over-block to avoid fines.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
"Of all tyrannies, a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies.
The robber baron’s cruelty may sometimes sleep, his cupidity may at some point be satiated; but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end for they do so with the approval of their own conscience.
They may be more likely to go to Heaven yet at the same time likelier to make a Hell of earth. This very kindness stings with intolerable insult. To be “cured” against one’s will and cured of states which we may not regard as disease is to be put on a level of those who have not yet reached the age of reason or those who never will; to be classed with infants, imbeciles, and domestic animals."
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
But, the flaws are so obvious, you have to wonder if there's more to the plan. It's a really stupid plan if the idea is to stop kids from accessing porn. But, as a backdoor way towards forcing mandatory individual ID, online tracking, censorship of politically undesirable speech, squashing dissent, etc., it might be quite handy.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Response to: Anonymous Coward on Jul 27th, 2017 @ 4:10am
"I swear, that wasn't me, I would never go on that sort of site."
"Well if it wasn't you, who was it?"
[Silence for a few seconds then both slowly look towards teenager's bedroom door]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
So let me get this straight...
You want to make it so that everyone who participates in this activity, which you consider vulgar, has to be registered, identified and verified.
...I forgot, what was this taboo subject that was so serious that you need to identify everyone who shows an interest in it? Was it pornography, or drugs, or terrorism, or a certain religion, or a certain country, or...?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: So let me get this straight...
Yes, absolutely! People who want to blow their nose or pass gas should absolutely have to be registered with a government registry. For the protection of us all. Think of the children!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Who didn't see this coming?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
That is being far to generous. At least with a chocolate dildo you still have some tasty chocolate. In fact it would be very useful for getting the bad taste out of your mouth that has been left by these regulations.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Only if you consider a blunderbuss to be a shotgun...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Just put it in the freezer for a couple hours and it should be good for at least one session.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
One adult chat room I like to go to, a lot of chatters from Britain are already using VPNs to evade the new porn wall
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
What I want to know is how this will validate age, as all it requires, is knowledge of the card number belonging to someone over the age of 18. its not as if the person presenting the evidence actually has to present the card, so all it takes is one person in a peer group to get the card information to enable the whole group to use it to 'validate' age.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
I used this historical site as one of the main references to write an essay and after their suspending, I decided to order full work in one custom writing service (https://pro-papers.com/) to save my own time.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Thank you
http://www.pillsuppliers.com/kamagra
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Is this possible?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Well Said!
http://www.medscolony.com/caverta.aspx
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
This changed into a totally useful web page and I am so grateful for it. I need to write an essay for intercourse records quickly and this website
Dissertation Writers is virtually helping me out with my observations. I wish extra humans will discover this page within the future due to the fact it's so helpful.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Well done!
Bunches of individuals are not well thinking about the impacts of the sexual medical problem. Extremely numerous youthful understudies are confronting the sexual medical problems, because of the pornography habit. Be that as it may, the sexual issue is effectively relieved by utilizing the pills.
Visit: https://www.kamagraoriginal.biz/
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
However, students and others from the academic campus have called for the dismissal of man. https://www.speedyessay.co.uk/british-essay-writers.php
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
<a href='www.youtube.com'>youtube</a>
<link=www.youtube.com>youtube</link>
[url=ww w.youtube.com]youtube[/url]
www.youtube.com
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Tech Help
From beginning to moment you're frustrated with email services, Yahoo offers 24x7 customer support for Yahoo users you just need to contact them to reach their support assistance.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
information
Thanks for answering to short answer questions. It was my pleasure to read all of the answers. I will use someof the answers to write an article for https://elitewritings.com/.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Yahoo Phone Number
Are you finding a technical expert to fix your all Yahoo mail glitches and errors instantly via online or troubleshooting without any hassles to fix it? Yahoo Phone number is avail 24*7 hours in a day to fix your Yahoo problems.
https://contact2yahoo.com/
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Distinguish If Its Sexual Harassment
Despite the notice and up to date media coverage, there's still an oversized section of the population that's entirely unaware of their rights. They fail to grasp what molestation means and the way they need to raise their voice against it. Therefore, if you are feeling even slightly uncomfortable or unsafe within the presence of the opposite gender and you are feeling the requirement to lift this concern to official authority, then bear it in your mind that it's harassment. Sarcastic or vulgar comments, whistles, and subtle touching are all signs of harassment. Hence, if you are feeling threatened or violated in any way possible, then you must contact the HR department of the corporate for a political candidate complaint.
Resource: Online Best Dissertation Help UK
[ link to this | view in chronology ]