Mozilla Study: Zero Rating Isn't The Miracle Broadband Duopolies And Facebook Pretend It Is
from the on-ramp-to-nowhere dept
For years now we've explored how large ISPs have (ab)used the lack of competition in the broadband market by imposing completely arbitrary and unnecessary usage caps and overage fees. But in addition to these glorified price hikes, ISPs have also long taken to exempting their own content from usage caps, while penalizing competitors -- allowing them to use this lack of broadband competition to tilt the content playing field in their favor. Incumbent ISPs have long tried to twist and distort this narrative, claiming that zero rating is the bits and bytes equivalent of a 1-800 data or free shipping.
Of course that's simply not the case, and zero rating simply shifts costs around to the benefit of entrenched mono/duopolists. Since caps and overage fees are arbitrary implementations not tied to any sound, real-world economics, the consumer isn't technically really saving anything (especially in the States, where we already pay more for data than most developed nations). And because content companies are often penalized while ISPs exempt themselves, this reduction in overall competition has very real negative cost impact on the end user.
This gross distortion of the market doesn't just benefit ISPs. Overseas, companies like Facebook have partnered with mobile carriers to cook up their own, poorly-received zero rating efforts, providing an AOL-esque portal to the internet stocked with Facebook-chosen content. Facebook tried to convince folks in India that it wasn't just trying to corner the international ad market, it was simply worried about the plight of the impoverished farmers.
When Facebook's plan was being debated last year, Mozilla quite-correctly pointed out that if Facebook was so worried about the poor getting access to the internet, it could... you know... actually help fund connections to the actual internet. Mozilla's now back with a new study that further deflates some of the common, bunk narratives surrounding zero rating, particularly the Facebook and ISP claim that zero rating is a wonderful "on ramp to the internet" that showers immeasurable benefits upon the backs of the poor.
More specifically, Mozilla and its international research partners found that zero rating isn't really an on ramp to anywhere useful:
"In all countries surveyed — excluding India where zero rating has been banned by the regulator — focus groups revealed that users are not coming online through zero rated services. While more research is needed, if zero rating is not actually serving as an on-ramp to bring people online, the benefits seem low, while the resulting risk of these offerings creating an anti-competitive environment is extremely high."
The study also gets to the real reason companies like Facebook are so breathlessly in love with zero rating -- it tends to keep users focused on just a handful of websites (and obviously the advertising companies like Facebook want seen). It should probably go without saying that users who are stuck with only a limited window to the internet, aren't getting the full benefits the internet has to offer. But one of Mozilla's research partners (pdf) also noted that many users of these walled garden, zero rated services wind up conflating "Facebook" with "the internet," which is one of Facebook's primary goals:
"In discussing promotions and Internet-use more broadly, respondents focus on Facebook. Some respondents from rural focus groups use Facebook and the Internet interchangeably, as, for example Internet search for them means searching within Facebook...Our findings raise concern of Facebook’s influence within Myanmar, as these zerorated promotions may serve to perpetuate its dominance and undermine widespread understanding of the distinction between its services and the ‘open Internet’.
Of course the decision to drive users to a handful of websites instead of the entire internet has a dramatic, negative impact on overall content competition. That's why India banned Facebook from engaging in this behavior, hoping to encourage efforts that help bring the real internet to the poor, not bizarre walled gardens where Facebook, Google or your ISP has the final say when it comes to the content and services you're seeing. Here in the States, where we're facing both a gutting of net neutrality rules and a looming reduction in competition thanks to mindless merger mania, we're about to get a crash course in how the "help" provided by zero rating is no real help at all.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: broadband, broadband access, net neutrality, zero rating
Companies: facebook, mozilla
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Can I say I "told ya so"?
Wheeler was never your friend, he just knows how to make it look like he is your friend!
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Don't take him out of context
Rather, the FCC is looking at cases where companies like AT&T and Verizon, which control significant chunks of broadband, favor their own "downstream" services (like DirecTV or go90) over competitors.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
What sad is that there are numerous people in our government that think the same thing of google... that google and the internet can be used interchangeably.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Facebook merely failed to grease the correct palms and include the correct government officials in the plan. Otherwise it would have gone through like salsa through a goose.
For what it's worth, it seems all of the links in this sort link back to this story. Sort of hard to read a report that isn't linked.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
This is why usage caps are not used in modern countries as people understand that caps are artificial and just an excuse to charge more for nothing.
A simple way to explain how it works is that you have a water pump and you are pumping water between two buckets...add a little colouring and the pump will continue as though nothing has changed. The water is the natural data stream you have when you switch on your internet connection.
Also with speeds, if you have say 20 people sharing a stream of data. the quicker the speed the sooner each person using that one stream will finish what they are downloading meaning that everyone benefits as the chance of congestion is lower the higher the speed, so higher speeds could mean that isps could instead of having 20 people using the same stream having 30 people using it and not seeing any change in congestion.The problem is that isps will increase speeds and use less hardware but charge more even though they are saving, they will also put more people on a single stream over what is reasonable causing congestion.
It is all a scam and the reason that google could give 1 gb download and upload speeds for the price one of the big isp's will charge for there slowest connection.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Don't take him out of context
They way you wrote your response you are okay with smaller ISP's getting away with things but not the bigger ones. A customer being cheated is a customer being cheated. It does not matter if it is AT&T or Jonny Appleseeds ISP Orchard!
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Google-funded research
Totally.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Don't take him out of context
It does fit into the larger context of that ac saying nothing but "i told you so", and "you are all idiots", and "Wheeler blah blah", and "regulations bad". Without evidence of anything. I can't keep track, but the ac may also be one who thinks everyone is a "leftist". (In a current climate where Saint Ronnie would be a "leftist", mind you.)
I also don't see the response indicating anything you say it seems to do.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Google-funded research
Yes, whatever it is you wish to imply is no surprise at all.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
(Was there a problem? Looking at the article again today, links seem to point to different articles, although two point to the same one, and none of them self-reference.)
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Google-funded research
Wow, hook me up with your dealer.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Usage caps are, to put it simply, nothing but a rip-off
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Usage caps are, to put it simply, nothing but a rip-off
If you want to keep the meter pegged, then you can and should pay more.
[ link to this | view in thread ]