Elsevier's Latest Brilliant Idea: Adding Geoblocking To Open Access

from the how-about-no? dept

Wed, Oct 4th 2017 7:34pm — Glyn Moody

We've just written about a troubling move by Elsevier to create its own, watered-down version of Wikipedia in the field of science. If you are wondering what other plans it has for the academic world, here's a post from Elsevier’s Vice President, Policy and Communications, Gemma Hersh, that offers some clues. She's "responsible for developing and refreshing policies in areas related to open access, open data, text mining and others," and in "Working towards a transition to open access", Hersh meditates upon the two main kinds of open access, "gold" and "green". She observes:

While gold open access offers immediate access to the final published article, the trade-off is cost. For those that can't or don't wish to pay the article publishing charge (APC) for gold open access, green open access -- making a version of the subscription article widely available after a time delay or embargo period -- remains a viable alternative to enabling widespread public access.

She has a suggestion for how the transition from green open access to gold open access might be effected:

Europe is a region where a transition to fully gold open access is likely to be most cost-neutral and, perhaps for this reason, where gold OA currently has the highest policy focus. This is in stark contrast to other research-intensive countries such as the US, China and Japan, which on the whole have pursued the subscription/green open access path. Therefore one possible first step for Europe to explore would be to enable European articles to be available gold open access within Europe and green open access outside of Europe.

Blithely ignoring the technical impossibility of enforcing an online geographical gold/green border, Hersh is proposing to add all the horrors of geoblocking -- a long-standing blight on the video world -- to open access. But gold open access papers that aren't fully accessible outside Europe simply aren't open access at all. The whole point of open access is that it makes academic work freely available to everyone, everywhere, without restriction -- unlike today, where only the privileged few can afford wide access to research that is often paid for by the public.

It's hard to know why Elsevier is putting forward an idea that is self-evidently preposterous. Perhaps it now feels it has such a stranglehold on the entire academic knowledge production process that it doesn't even need to hide its contempt for open access and those who support it.

Follow me @glynmoody on Twitter or identi.ca, and +glynmoody on Google+

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team

Filed Under: academic research, geoblocking, gold open access, green open access, open access
Companies: elsevier

14 Comments

If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...

Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread

Anonymous Coward, 4 Oct 2017 @ 9:16pm

Or in other words, Elsevier thinks that if they use high quality wholemeal bread instead of white and a solid gold plate instead of boring old ceramic, maybe nobody will notice that the shit sandwich they're serving to everyone else is, at the end of the day, still a shit sandwich.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 4 Oct 2017 @ 10:55pm

Long past time for the US government to mandate in law that all research funded with tax payer grants will be released in full in the public domain, open access, and remain either unpatented or patents to be granted solely to the government in repayment of the trust of grants for the furtherance of future research. After all, it's bought and paid for by the public, the public should directly benefit without greedy gatekeepers who only live high off the public trough.

That would permanently pull the teeth of such vipers as Elsevier. With prejudice.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- hamillhair (profile), 4 Oct 2017 @ 11:48pm
  
  Re:
  It's interesting, because I worked in engineering academic research in the UK until very recently and have published a few papers with Elsevier (since they own all the big journals).
  
  One of the requirements of the UK funding councils (public bodies) was that all research must be published open access. Part of the conditions for getting our research grant was that we had to allocate funds to cover the costs of publishing open access, precisely because it is publicly funded and must therefore be publicly available.
  
  The other thing that we used to do was just upload the unpublished version to the university's institutional repository. The content was basically identical to the public version, but not covered by copyright and covered in highlights and unformatted, so you could read that version and just cite the published version.
  
  It is a matter of great confusion to me as to why these kind of paywalls exist in academia at all. All the papers I've written I want to be read as widely as possible and as many copies to be made as possible so more people read them. As a researcher, "protection" does not help me at all. Unless I wanted to patent it or something, but then why would I publish at all?
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Daydream, 5 Oct 2017 @ 12:11am

If you're not sure about piracy...
If you're still uncertain whether you should pirate stuff as a matter of principle, if you think that starving creators rightfully deserve to be compensated for all their hard work...

Just remember that 'geoblocking' is a politically correct way to say 'we discriminate against people based on their country of origin'.

And I'd be very interested to know how much Elsevier pays to authors when people pay to download their publications.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Lawrence D’Oliveiro, 5 Oct 2017 @ 12:41am
  
  Re: how much Elsevier pays to authors
  Nothing. Authors pay Elsevier for the privilege of being published. In journals which subscribers need to pay an arm and a leg for. This includes the authors themselves.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Mc, 5 Oct 2017 @ 12:41am
  
  Re: If you're not sure about piracy...
  > And I'd be very interested to know how much Elsevier pays to authors when people pay to download their publications.
  
  0.
  
  The job of scientific publishers is:
  - to take papers written by government-payed scientists, optionaly even have them pay for submissions,
  - hand those papers to other public-money-funded scientists to review and ensure they are good quality (for free)
  - put the pdf online and charge (again) public institutions hundred of thousands of dollars for access or individuals about $30/pdf.
  
  Every cent in this process goes exclusively to the publisher.
  
  (Scientific publishers are among the most profitable companies in the world)
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
- PaulT (profile), 5 Oct 2017 @ 2:53am
  
  Re: If you're not sure about piracy...
  "Just remember that 'geoblocking' is a politically correct way to say 'we discriminate against people based on their country of origin'."
  
  Correction: discriminate against people depending on where they happen to be sitting. Nobody will check your passport before blocking you from accessing Hulu after you land in a foreign airport, for example, though as a tourist I've made use of a free trial or 2 while I've been in the US.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 5 Oct 2017 @ 1:13am

To Elsevier, open access is a premium service, and so I bet they are working on a way to charge a premium for access to open access publications.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
PaulT (profile), 5 Oct 2017 @ 2:51am

It's always fascinating to me that not only do these kinds of people insist on applying things that really haven't worked in other industries, but they insist on making the same mistakes. Even if it worked, that kinds of "border" between different regions will be circumvented constantly by people angry at having different access depending on where they happen to be seated at the time. As with video geoblocking, it only makes sense if you ignore the fact that people travel, and I can imagine that European scientists who regularly travel outside the continent will be annoyed very quickly at different kinds of access and circumvent them quickly.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 5 Oct 2017 @ 3:46am

And this is why...
...we should all be uploading every Elsevier publication that we can, any way we can, anywhere we can. Every paper, every book, every set of conference proceedings: redistribute all of it. What's bad for Elsevier is good for the Internet, good for research, and good for the planet.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- GrafdeGue, 5 Oct 2017 @ 3:43pm
  
  Re: And this is why...
  try scihub.cc
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Jason, 5 Oct 2017 @ 5:38am

They keep using that word...
If they have to qualify "open" access with various levels of restrictions, then isn't it---by definition---not open any more?

As the man said: "I don't think it means what you think it means."
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Ninja (profile), 5 Oct 2017 @ 6:01am

Good, they are making stuff like Sci-hub even more attractive and hpefully speeding up their death. Good I tell you.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Tom Mink (profile), 6 Oct 2017 @ 10:31am

Prestigious international campuses
Since the big thing these days is for universities to establish international cooperatives with other schools or even full blown satellite campuses, geoblocking is going to play merry hell with library IT departments. As bad as it is for collaboration in general, the visiting professor whose VPN resolves to a foreign IP is gonna be pissed when they can't participate in a departmental discussion
[ link to this | view in chronology ]