Seeking To Root Out Leakers, The Intelligence Community Is Destroying Official Routes For Whistleblowers
from the ensuring-there's-only-one-way-out dept
The Trump Administration is continuing its war on leakers. It's probably meant to keep whistleblowers at bay as well. This isn't necessarily a trait unique to Trump's White House. There really hasn't been a whistleblower-friendly administration in pretty much ever, but this particular administration has been awash in leaked documents, each one prompting more severe crackdowns.
But it's going to come to a head at the national security level. The "Intelligence Community" -- sixteen agencies participating and partaking in intelligence analysis and collection under the Office of the Director of National Intelligence -- is basically ousting its internal oversight. Jenna McLaughlin, writing for Foreign Policy, has the details.
[Dan] Meyer, whose job is to talk to intelligence community whistleblowers, can no longer talk to whistleblowers. He has been barred from communicating with whistleblowers, the main responsibility of his job as the executive director for intelligence community whistleblowing and source protection. He is currently working on an instructional pamphlet for whistleblowers, and he will have no duties to perform after he’s completed that work.
He can also no longer brief the agencies or the congressional committees on his work as he’s done in the past, send out his whistleblower newsletter, or conduct outreach. And he has no deputy or staff.
This is the end result of internal struggles and the continual sidelining of the so-called "proper channels." They weren't worth much when Snowden decided to leak. They were relatively worthless when others leaked documents years before Snowden began changing the intelligence community from the far outside. And if they were ever going to be worth anything, that effort has been derailed in favor of hunting down leakers.
This is incredibly stupid. If the administration wants to stop leaks, one of the better tools is proper channels that actually work -- ones that get results and shield whistleblowers from retaliation. Instead, intelligence officials have decided leaking and whistleblowing are pretty much the same thing and have headed off attempts to build an official whistleblowing outfit worth a damn
What's being ousted, bit by bit, is the IC's Inspector General's office. Elimination of whistleblower outlets may only be part of the plan. Once rendered toothless, it may be prevented from performing other oversight duties. But the war of leakers starts where it always starts: with whistleblowers. If the Inspector General's office is completely neutralized, the only option will be leaking, not exactly the best news for this particularly sieve-like administration.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: inspector general, intelligence community, leaks, whistleblowers
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
The beatings will continue until moral improves.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
The beatings will continue until morale improves and morals are destroyed!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Good.
The way to deal with an active volcano is to plug it up. Look ma, no more leaks.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Good.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Good.
Ahh, so that's what those human sacrifices into volcanoes were for. Looks like this administration is trying something similar.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Ummm - wut? Perhaps a review of history is in order
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
The U.S. did not just fight Germany in WWII. Now bringing WWI into it seems indeed like sort of a stretch as that wasn't as much a clash of doctrines.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Not only did they take away any additional work, but the pamphlet can really only consist of a couple of recommendations:
Option 1) Don't blow the whistle. It will probably ruin your life.
Option 2) Take the following steps:
- Gather your evidence
- Immediately leave the country and seek refuge in a country that will not extradite
- Pass your evidence to a news outlet outside of the US
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Leaks/Whistle-blowing
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
If you see something bad, you are supposed to take it up the chain.
The chain is told to crush you & discredit you, ignore & cover-up and wrong doing reported.
Lets get rid of someone who might actually punish us for attacking people reporting on crimes we commit.
So with this ideal system they are SHOCKED just SHOCKED that people run the risk of taking things public. The system is broken, it protects law breakers, & the entire system is on the side of hiding bad acts.
Maybe if they stopped lying to the public and their alleged oversight we could trust them to keep their own house clean... but yeah that's not happening.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Why not get rid of the whistleblower hotline?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Brilliant!
Take away the 'official' channels so that the handful of people that were still naive enough to think that they would accomplish anything other than painting a target on their backs by going through the 'official channels' are faced with either keeping quiet or dumping anything directly to the public.
That'll certainly cut down on that whistle-blower problem.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Uhm... If you blow the whistle and nobody is there to hear it, is there a sound?
Or was it about when you open the box and can hear a whistle, the cat is a traitor?
No, I forgot the punch line. But it was something about whistleblowers being imaginary. If they effect any change, they are traitors, and if they don't, they aren't whistleblowers but fired. Something like that. But no, they are fired either way.
Somebody remind me?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
If you blow the whistle and an anvil lands on your head, is there a sound?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]