Australian Government Wants To Punish Whistleblowers And Journalists Who Leak Classified Documents With Up To 20 Years In Prison
from the maybe-they-haven't-heard-about-this-internet-thing dept
Whistleblowing stories have become something of a commonplace, as a stream of Techdirt posts attests. Some leaks offer massive revelations, like the documents released by Chelsea Manning, or Edward Snowden. Others are smaller scale, but expose unsuspected activities that powerful people were trying to keep in the shadows. Here, for example, is a recent leak published in the Guardian about big companies spying on law-abiding organizations that dare to disagree with them:
They shine a rare light on a habitually secretive industry in which large firms hire covert operatives to monitor and infiltrate political groups that object to their commercial activities. At a premium is advance information, tipping off the firms about protests that are being organised against them.
As the Snowden files proved, leaks about government activities can have particularly important knock-on consequences in terms of improving the balance of power between citizens and their supposed representatives. Perhaps because of that effect, the Australian government plans to bring in new laws that could see whistleblowers jailed for 20 years:
Australian government and intelligence whistleblowers -- and potentially even journalists -- may face up to 20 years in jail for disclosing classified information, under the most sweeping changes to the country's secrecy laws since they were introduced.
BuzzFeed reports the legislation will be extremely broad:
The new laws will apply to anyone, not just government officials. They could easily apply to journalists and organisations like WikiLeaks that "communicate" or "deal" with information, instead of just government officials. They will also close a longstanding gap around contractors working on behalf of government agencies, who will also be subject to the new offences.
The good news is:
Journalists will have a defence available to them if publication of information is considered to be in the public interest and is "in the person’s capacity as a journalist engaged in fair and accurate reporting".
But the bad news is the onus will be on journalists to show that they satisfy those conditions -- likely to be expensive and maybe even impossible. Despite that issue, it seems doubtful that the new law will have much impact on leaking. After all, most whistleblowers know and accept that they are taking a risk when they release sensitive material, but have already decided it is worth it. Manning and Snowden were not deterred by the threat of extremely serious penalties, and there will always be people brave enough to follow in their footsteps, whatever the consequences.
As far as news organizations are concerned, while it is true that Australian titles may think twice before publishing leaked government documents, there are plenty of other outlets around the world that won't. Even if other newspapers are reluctant to risk the wrath of the Australian government -- perhaps because they have offices and journalists in the country that would be vulnerable to retaliation -- it is easy to set up a dedicated site for the leaks, and then use social media to spread the word. That's essentially what WikiLeaks does, which is unlikely to take any notice of the new law either.
If the Australian government -- or indeed any government -- wants to reduce leaks it should place as much information as possible in the public domain, and seek to protect only the extremely sensitive stuff. Trying to enforce excessive and unnecessary secrecy with manifestly vindictive punishments simply undermines people's respect for the whole system, and probably provokes even more whistleblowers to leak.
Follow me @glynmoody on Twitter or identi.ca, and +glynmoody on Google+
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: australia, classified documents, crime, free speech, journalism, whistleblowers
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
'Just in case' I'm sure
It might just be me, but a government putting in place a threat of 20 years in jail for whistleblowers/leakers has me immediately wondering just what they are doing that is so bad and that they are apparently so desperate to hide.
You don't threaten two decades for minor secrets, for a response like that I can't help but suspect that they are worried some really damning stuff might be made public and they're trying to prevent that from happening by scaring people off.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: 'Just in case' I'm sure
In other news, any attempted independent audit or public scrutiny of our records will be met with a 20-year prison sentence."
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
"fair and accurate" standard is biased
Any engineer will tell you that one-way rectification of noise will yield a biased result. You don't get unbiased without permitting negative values at all.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
join the dark side
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
step 2, make anything "we" deed national security or classified illegal to report to the news, that release of classified information gave us the perfect excuse to do it!
step 3, wait for something else bad to happen and make a law to protect things that removes more of their liberty.
Don't feel bad Aussies, you are not the only cuntry in the world becoming a tyranny under the guise of being a "democracy" heh heh.
People are so easy to trick.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
If it is classified for national security purposes, it shouldn't be revealed. If it is classified to protect people for doing the wrong thing, it shouldn't be classified.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
REAL freedom of press means anything can be legally given to the press so that it may be exposed to the light of day, NO EXCEPTION, otherwise it's nothing more than a gateway to human corruption.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
So yes, all "weapons information" probably falls under it, except launch codes and other keys.
Second, the locations where alien bodies lie are rather well known, for instance: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chinese_massacre_of_1871 There's more of these, where alien immigrants were massacred, like the Ludlow Massacre.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: excessive and unnecessary secrecy
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Crooks shielding crooks, i.e., themselves.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Never Mind Legal Restrictions ...
... Aussie media just lacks enthusiasm for reporting some uncomfortable things ...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
This can be seen by the various draconian legislation that has been passed in the last couple of years. All sides have supported such with only a handful actually objecting.
The Soap Opera called Australian Parliament and Governance is all about fooling the citizens of Australia into thinking that any of the major parties care about the citizens and the well being of the country.
There only care is who is seen as the good guy without ever having to reveal that they are all bad guys.
At a state level, we have corruption in high places. Whether its Adani in Queensland or Safe Schools in Victoria, power infrastructure in South Australia or youth detention in Northern Territory or just the endemic corruption in New South Wales, the citizens are being blind-sided by those who are supposed to be responsible for the care and maintenance of the respective states.
Australia is heading down into the pit of hell following in the footsteps of the USA ,Europe, China, Russia and all those other hellholes.
There is a place called Hellhole and it is starting to appear to be a better place to live than many of the technologically advanced locations around the world.
So keep up the "good" fight and keep believing in the lies and deceptions the party you follow promulgates (irrespective of left or right of politics).
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]