This Week In Techdirt History: December 24th - 30th
from the EOY dept
Five Years Ago
This week in 2012, we were a bit surprised and confused to see pirated movies being shared from Hollywood IP addresses — and, it soon turned out, from all major record labels, and several government agencies including the DOJ. Whether this was just amateur honeypotting was unclear, but whatever the case, Hollywood still broke records at the box office that year. Meanwhile, the Senate was debating the extension of FISA — which means they were rejecting amendments that could improve it and passing it with all its problems intact.
Ten Years Ago
This week in 2007, we took a look at Hollywood's ongoing crusade to convince ISPs around the world to block sites it doesn't like, and also at how the industry's supposed challenges with digitally archiving films are caused by their obsession with ownership and copyright, not technological limitations. The MPAA, at least, realized (after years of complaints) that elaborately DRM-laden DVD screeners for the Oscars are not worth the effort. Meanwhile, as the EU began looking to destroy fashion innovation by enforcing fashion copyrights, we were even more distressed to hear copyright mentioned in the same breath as the great pyramids of Egypt and the works of Michelangelo.
Fifteen Years Ago
This week in 2002, people were telling the Copyright Office just what they think about the terrible parts of the DMCA, as Declan McCullough was treading the line of fearmongering but still providing a good look at some of the injustices the law enables. Cablevision's Optimum Online broadband was threatening to ban customers who use file trading services (regardless of the purpose of their use), and Hollywood was still obsessed with DRM — and this is an industry smart enough to fire the guy who convinced them selling DVDs might be a good idea!
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Yeah, this website is apparently insignificant, irrelevant. Yet you tools keep coming back for more and bitch about the piracy you think is happening. It's like a surgeon recommending a lobotomy and amputation for the common cold.
And there's also the fact that Shiva Ayyadurai tried to take down this website (guess somebody gave a fuck after all, unlike what you'd like to believe) and got his ass kicked. Sucks to be you, don't it?
Have a good year being a dick, antidirt, or whichever you non-logging-in knuckledraggers this is. Don't forget to step in the wood chipper on your way out...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Wow, re-reading those first two articles it was positively staggering how much blatant hypocrisy, fake cluelessness and special pleading was on display by the contrarian squad.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: how much blatant hypocrisy, fake cluelessness and special pleading was on display
Eventually, those people realized that that viewpoint wasn’t going to fly. Or maybe they gave up and went somewhere more friendly to their prejudices.
These days, it seems the pro-“intellectual-property”-ers have given up trying to claim that the facts are on their side. So they are reduced to responding more along the lines of sullen passive-aggressiveness and loud sulking. Basically, insinuating that there must be something wrong with all the evidence, without being able to actually come out and say what it is.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Wow, re-reading those first two articles it was positively staggering how much blatant hypocrisy, fake cluelessness and special pleading was on display by the contrarian squad.
Wow. That was a trip down troll memory lane...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]