One Down: Instagram Caves To Russian Censorship As All Eyes Turn To YouTube
from the don't-be-evil dept
We had just been talking about Instagram and YouTube facing site blocks in Russia all because a billionaire didn't like his dirty laundry exposed online. For brief background, a noted Russian dissident, Alexy Navalny, had published photos of billionaire Oleg Deripaska and Deputy Prime Minister Sergey Prikhodko relaxing on a yacht with a young woman variously described as a model and escort fawning over them. Importantly, the salacious nature of the photos and videos is only half of the reason Navalny is drawing attention to them. The other reason is his accusations of corruption in government, as a massively wealthy oligarch consorts in this fashion with a high-ranking member of the federal government. Despite that, or perhaps because of it, Russian courts had handed Deripaska a legal victory and ordered sites hosting the images, including Instagram and YouTube, to take them down. Russia's notoriously corrupt site-blocking agency, Rozcomnadzor, issued an edict that the images be removed or the sites would face a potential full block in Russia.
In that post as well, we posited that American companies should not be assisting authoritarian regimes in political censorship of this sort. Well, it seems that Facebook's Instagram has decided to cave to the censors.
A spokeswoman for Facebook would not discuss the specifics of the case but confirmed that it had decided to comply with Roskomnadzor's demands.
"When governments believe that something on the internet violates their laws, they may contact companies and ask us to restrict access to that content," she said. "We review such requests carefully in light of local laws and where appropriate, we make it unavailable in the relevant country or territory. We are transparent about any content restrictions we make for government requests with local law in our Transparency Report."
Let's be clear about what happened here. A political opponent of the current Russian regime posted embarrassing photos showing both a potentially salacious act with a young woman and, more importantly, a potentially inappropriate relationship between government and a wealthy businessman. Whatever level of transparency Facebook desires to have on this matter, the simple fact is that an American company has chosen to bow to what certainly seems like pure political censorship. Whatever the privacy concerns Deripaska may have raised in court, it should be clear to anyone that similar pictures of some every-day person in Russia would not have been treated with so heavy a hand. This all looks to have been done to avoid political embarrassment above anything else.
And, so, now all eyes turn to Google.
Its response contrasts with that of Google's YouTube service. It had been ordered to block several clips before the end of Wednesday. But it has taken no such action.
Will Google cave as well? If I were to bet on the matter, that seems an outcome at least as likely as any other, but the company certainly shouldn't give into such demands. And, frankly, if any company has the power to get into a staring contest with the Russian government, it's Google. Whether it has the backbone for it remains to be seen, but I would guess there would be far too much backlash over a full block of YouTube in Russia to be worth the government blocking the site in full.
And, again, it's just not a good look to have an American company support this kind of corruption and censorship. It's a shame Facebook couldn't find its stance on the matter, but perhaps Google can do better.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: alexy navalny, censorship, oleg deripaska, rozcomnadzor, russia, sergey prikhodko
Companies: facebook, instagram, youtube
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Streisand Effect
Not saying they should or shouldn't have gone along with it, just pointing that out.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Streisand Effect
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
A political opponent of the current Russian regime posted embarrassing photos
I haven't looked to see about which exact photos these are, but frequently they are posted initially by the persons being exposed, or related parties, then discovered out in the open or by using OSInt methods connecting social accounts to particular people. It would not surprise me to see the very same photos still up, in accounts held those on the side of power. They are brazen mofos.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Navalny drew audience's attention to those photos and discovered the connection between people involved in this case.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
I guess Rozcomnadzor is going to have to burn Rybka's book as well.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
If this is about the politician
He is in the footsteps of of George Osborne
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/7693241.stm
and Peter Mandelson
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/7690459.stm
The fact is that Deripaska seems to have entertained a large proportion of Europe's politicians at some time or other.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: If this is about the politician
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
It is actually called Roscomnadzor or Roskomnadzor. Definitely not "Roz". Here "Ros" (Рос) is short for "Rossia" (Россия), "com" or "kom" (ком) is short for "kommunikatsia" (коммуникация – communication) and "nadzor" (надзор) means "supervision".
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
... it's just not a good look to have an American company support this kind of corruption and censorship
So what kind of corruption and censorship do you think they should support?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Depends. They could, taking what little backlash there will be from those in the know, but not much else.
Or they could say no, and then take on whatever Russia does. Which, could be real interesting to watch.
My money is on the one that causes Google to lose the least amount of money.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Software training in medavakkam chennai
-Rangasri
http://glimtechnologies.in/sap-sd-training-in-chennai.html
[ link to this | view in chronology ]