Spanish Hate/Anti-Terrorism Speech Laws Doing Little But Locking Up Comedians, Artists, And Dissidents

from the it-will-get-a-whole-lot-worse-before-it-gets-even-worse dept

Fri, Mar 23rd 2018 3:23am — Tim Cushing

As Spain continues to expand its (anti-)speech laws, the rights of its citizens continue to contract. Not content with making it illegal to insult a cop or government officials, the Spanish government has decided to tackle hate speech and terrorism with the same ineptitude.

There's no punchline here. People are being arrested and charged with speech having nothing to with promoting hate or terrorism. And this is in addition to people who've found themselves targeted by vindictive public servants for daring to publicly criticize their words or actions.

It's gotten so bad Amnesty International -- an entity that usually spends its time decrying the acts of dictators and brutal authoritarians -- has felt compelled to speak up about Spain's terrible speech laws. Mathew Ingram has more details at Columbia Journalism Review.

In a new report on the phenomenon, entitled “Tweet… If You Dare,” Amnesty International looks at the rise in prosecutions under Article 578 of the country’s criminal code, which prohibits “glorifying terrorism” and “humiliating the victims of terrorism.” The law has been around since 2000, but was amended in 2015 and since then prosecutions and convictions have risen sharply.

So, who's been doing all this glorifying and humiliating? Well, it's not supporters of terrorism. Instead, it's musicians, artists, people telling jokes -- pretty much everybody but actual terrorists or proponents of hate.

Among those who have been hit by the law are a musician who tweeted a joke about sending the king a cake-bomb for his birthday and was sentenced to a year in prison, and a rapper who was sentenced to three-and-a-half years in jail for writing songs that the government said glorified terrorism and insulted the crown. A filmmaker and a journalist have also been charged under the anti-terrorism law, and a student who tweeted jokes about the assassination of the Spanish prime minister in 1973 was also sentenced to a year in prison, although her sentence was suspended after a public outcry.

Don't read too much into the into the post-outcry suspended sentence. Spain's government is still busy ensuring satire, commentary, and anything else that might wander into the territory of offensive remains a criminal offense. Anything that has been walked back has been the result of public outcry. Amnesty National's report "Tweet… if you dare" [PDF] notes hate speech and anti-terrorism speech law violations have resulted in 70 convictions over the past two years.

The student, (Cassandra Vera) who was arrested and sentenced for joking about a 45-year-old assassination, notes the government is still involved in acts of censorship that would be ridiculous if they weren't backed by threats of jail time.

Vera expressed similar views after her sentence was overturned. She pointed to the recent censorship of a work at a Madrid art fair and the seizure, on a judge’s orders, of Fariña, a book about drug-trafficking in Galicia, as proof that something was seriously wrong with free speech in Spain.

“People shouldn’t have to be afraid of expressing their opinions,” she told the Guardian. “What happened with Valtonyc and Fariña and the art exhibition showed that freedom of expression is under serious attack. I think freedom of expression has been dealt an almost fatal blow in Spain.”

Amnesty International is demanding the law be repealed. It has done little to deter acts of terrorism or successfully counter hate speech. Instead, it has been used to target dissidents, activists, and others who criticize the government. Whatever terrorism happens to be addressed under the law apparently only considers certain acts by domestic terrorists to be worthy of enforcement. Content and communications glorifying foreign terrorist groups is usually ignored by the government. As its report points out, the speech laws enacted by the Spanish government violate the rights of its citizens.

By using these laws to criminalize lawful expression, the Spanish authorities are disregarding international human rights law and standards. The impact of Article 578 is devastating to individuals – ranging from hefty fines, to lengthy periods of exclusion from the public sector, to prison sentences.

But even beyond these sanctions, such misuse of counter-terrorism provisions leads people to engage in self-censorship for fear that they may be targeted. The criminalization of such a wide range of expression has a general chilling effect and can create an environment where individuals are afraid of expressing unpopular views, or even making controversial jokes.

The report also notes several other European countries are also beginning to curtail the rights of their citizens in their quest to target hate speech and international terrorism. Germany's hate speech law roll out has been an unmitigated disaster and other countries like France and Italy seem all too willing to join Spain and Germany in killing satire, parody, and content they just don't agree with. All of this is being done under the heading of "public safety," but in reality, the public is no safer and will develop an unhealthy fear of their own governments.

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team

Filed Under: art, censorship, comedy, free speech, hate speech, satire, spain

76 Comments

If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...

Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread

That One Guy (profile), 23 Mar 2018 @ 2:06am

Makes perfect, if twisted sense
To would-be dictators and tyrants the worst form of 'terrorism' is not inflicting deaths among the general public, it's dissent, challenging or calling out those in power.

After all there's millions of the unwashed masses and more always popping up, but criticizing the ruling class, those who 'know better' and are the country, well that threatens everyone(but especially those that really count), and is therefore far more serious a crime, one that needs to be nipped right in the bud and/or thrown in a cell.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 23 Mar 2018 @ 3:47am

but aren't all governments trying to do the same thing? stop as many as possible from saying anything/everything the government doesn't like? making any excuse to turn the country in question into a dictatorship, where no one is allowed to have an opinion, to state an opinion, to have free speech, freedom or privacy? the planet is being turned into what the likes of Hitler tried to do but without using guns (at the moment!), one where the government rules everything, the people have nothing and can be jailed in an instance at a whim!! total planetary slavery is just around the corner!!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Anonymous Coward, 23 Mar 2018 @ 7:41am
  
  Re:
  "the government rules everything,"
  
  Just a proxy for the uber riche.
  Let's put the blame where it belongs.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - Wendy Cockcroft, 26 Mar 2018 @ 5:54am
    
    Re: Re:
    That's only the case where people aren't politically engaged. Most of us outsource democracy to our representatives instead of holding them to account for their actions. Imagine a world in which all politicians were kept on a short leash by their constituents.
    
    As it is, they're toeing the line for their campaign donors. There's your problem, sort that out.
    
    Fearing the government on principle doesn't solve problems.
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
David, 23 Mar 2018 @ 4:31am

Working as expected.

It has done little to deter acts of terrorism or successfully counter hate speech. Instead, it has been used to target dissidents, activists, and others who criticize the government.

Actual terrorism will always be the exception, singular cases. Otherwise it stops being terrorism and starts being civil war, a brutal normality.

So any law addressing terrorism in particular can only address precursors rather than terrorism itself (which is effectively dealt with using less specific laws) if it is supposed to have a noticeable effect.

"Dissidents, activists, and others who criticize the government." are precursors. That's particularly relevant for Spain which is under pressure from various separatist political movements driven by dissent with a central Castilian government.

So yes, the laws are applied according to the intent and purpose they have been drafted for. Which makes obvious that any measures specifically drafted for dealing with terrorism at a different level than the crimes committed in the name of terrorism itself are very likely to address any kind of serious criticism against the powers that be.

Which is actually water on the mills of opposition up to the level of senseless terrorism.

If you outlaw criticism, the only people uttering it will be criminals.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Anonymous Coward, 23 Mar 2018 @ 7:44am
  
  Re: Working as expected.
  precursors ... yeah, pre-crime is still their wet dream right?
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - David, 23 Mar 2018 @ 8:35am
    
    Re: Re: Working as expected.
    
    precursors ... yeah, pre-crime is still their wet dream right?
    
    Why wouldn't it always be? You don't want to wait until the damage (or actual crime) is done, and jailing on pre-crime is much faster (and a sell much better matching government periods) than waiting decades for the unreliable harvest of comprehensive education.
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
    - Anonymous Coward, 23 Mar 2018 @ 8:42am
      
      Re: Re: Re: Working as expected.
      I guess they already have their early versions of pre-crime -aka probable cause. And the perp does not even have to be charged in order to be burdened with the repercussions of being accused.
      [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Yes, I know I'm commenting anonymously, 23 Mar 2018 @ 4:52am

I would post my opinion on this topic..
but I, too, live in the EU.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 23 Mar 2018 @ 5:27am

More from the great minds over in...
...Spain, the same people who brought us the "Google tax."
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- David, 23 Mar 2018 @ 5:44am
  
  Re: More from the great minds over in...
  Well, it was basically the country in Europe retaining (instead of eventually getting a relapse) fascism after WWII. So they are working from an ongoing (if changing) continuity of laws and political leanings rather than a clean break.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Anonymous Coward, 23 Mar 2018 @ 7:45am
  
  Re: More from the great minds over in...
  Generalissimo Francisco Franco is still dead
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - David, 23 Mar 2018 @ 10:08am
    
    Re: Re: More from the great minds over in...
    When they buried him they didn't realize he was a seed.
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - Anonymous Coward, 24 Mar 2018 @ 7:38pm
    
    Re: Re: More from the great minds over in...
    But still proud.
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 23 Mar 2018 @ 6:55am

So lovely...
to see the government people asked to protect them oppressing them instead.

I hate to say this, but Spain is just ANOTHER walking example of comeuppance for humans. This is what we constantly do to ourselves in the pursuit of "security".

When the government drives a dagger in our backs, it is only because we gave it to them! History is repeating itself, people have grown tired of peace and have foolishly forgotten the price of liberty and refuse to pay the tab.

You either pay the tab, or become the currency!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Anonymous Coward, 23 Mar 2018 @ 7:48am
  
  Re: So lovely...
  Did you major in psychology or political science?
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - Anonymous Coward, 23 Mar 2018 @ 7:55am
    
    Re: Re: So lovely...
    neither
    
    but I do major in watching humans constantly sabotage themselves.
    
    People will literally jump off a cliff and bitch at all the others falling with them that they are falling and expect someone else to fix the problem without doing anything about it themselves.
    
    By the time everyone hits the bottom they have banded together to do only one thing... Curse not the ones that made them perish, but those they expected to save them!
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
    - Anonymous Coward, 23 Mar 2018 @ 8:10am
      
      Re: Re: Re: So lovely...
      Perhaps society is a bit more complex than you allude.
      
      Also, your analogies are lame. Everyone knows that a good analogy has a car in it, come on now - give it the good old college try.
      [ link to this | view in chronology ]
      - Anonymous Coward, 23 Mar 2018 @ 8:13am
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re: So lovely...
        lol....
        
        Okay... so every drove off the cliff and landed in the junk yard below honking at each other on the way down!
        
        Humans are not so complex. Individuals, yes the individual is indeed complex... but humans collectively? No. There is a reason they call it the "mob mentality" and why humans naturally form "groups" and follow the hive mind even when it not to their actual benefit.
        
        Go ahead step out of line... see what you get!
        [ link to this | view in chronology ]
        
        Anonymous Coward, 23 Mar 2018 @ 8:46am
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: So lovely...
        "Go ahead step out of line... see what you get!"
        
        Yes, and taken to its extreme will cause downfall of the civilization. Oh, and not everyone is a minion. Need to choose your battles.
        [ link to this | view in chronology ]
        
        Anonymous Coward, 23 Mar 2018 @ 9:06am
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: So lovely...
        Not everyone, just most. The failure to understand that is what keeps this problem going.
        
        Just take this exchange for example. We are in the middle of fussing about well understood human nature as though people are prone to resisting tyranny when they are in fact prone to just accept it. Government knows this, and they know that putting a boot on the back of everyone necks is easy to do, so long as they slowly approach you to do it.
        
        It's only when it comes rushing at us do we choose to defend.
        
        I guarantee that you would let me enslave your family as long as I promised to save them from someone that would destroy them. Government will use you against them and them against you, it will work, and it will work amazingly well!
        [ link to this | view in chronology ]
        
        Anonymous Coward, 23 Mar 2018 @ 11:16am
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: So lovely...
        I recall watching many people out in the streets protesting on several issues and they did not look as though they were accepting any tyranny.
        
        You can not guarantee me anything and you assume way too much.
        [ link to this | view in chronology ]
        
        PlagueSD (profile), 23 Mar 2018 @ 10:08am
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: So lovely...
        Reminds me of the experiment with monkeys, a ladder, some bananas, and a water hose...
        
        http://www.wisdompills.com/2014/05/28/the-famous-social-experiment-5-monkeys-a-ladder/
        [ link to this | view in chronology ]
        
        Anonymous Coward, 23 Mar 2018 @ 11:18am
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: So lovely...
        So yer sayin the rich elite ruling class is nothing but a bunch of monkeys? lol
        [ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Anonymous Coward, 24 Mar 2018 @ 6:15pm
  
  Re: So lovely...
  Yep and american children have been co-oped into the gov't needs to protect me too movement, to their own detriment by
  adults unwilling to have the balls to take their own protection into their own hands .
  They are basically laying the bricks for their own gas chambers and are willfully marching right into them .
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - Anonymous Coward, 25 Mar 2018 @ 6:43am
    
    Re: Re: So lovely...
    Why do you think the government need to protect the meetoo movement and from whom? Is this protection over and above what a typical citizen would be afforded? In what way?
    
    So, I guess you are one of those gun toting racist misogynistic blabber mouths I keep hearing about. Did the government fill all those FEMA camps in Texas during Jade Helm? That must be where the gas chambers are being built.
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
    - Wendy Cockcroft, 26 Mar 2018 @ 5:58am
      
      Re: Re: Re: So lovely...
      Here's a dirty secret: anarchy ==> tyranny. How? First they collapse the institutions of government in the name of ending tyranny. In the vacuum that ensues power brokers move in promising to put an end to the chaos. Result: tyranny. See Russian history post Revolution for details, comrades.
      [ link to this | view in chronology ]
      - Anonymous Coward, 26 Mar 2018 @ 6:00pm
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re: So lovely...
        We don't even need to go back so far in time to see examples of this process. After the US invaded and conquered Iraq and forcibly dismantled all government entities, including military and police, the predictable chaos and crime wave that resulted paved the way to the people accepting rule that was in many ways even more repressive and incompetent than the previous government.
        
        http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/03/19/AR2007031900421.html
        [ link to this | view in chronology ]
        
        Wendy Cockcroft, 27 Mar 2018 @ 5:31am
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: So lovely...
        Indeed. The anti-Big Government types aren't interested in learning from history. For them it's about the principle of the thing, empiricism be damned.
        [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Christenson, 23 Mar 2018 @ 7:03am

But the law itself glorifies terrorism...from the Gub'mint!
That is, a law that enables officials to terrorize the citizentry over innocent tweets is a law glorifying terrorism, and, by its own terms, must be illegal!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Anonymous Coward, 23 Mar 2018 @ 8:11am
  
  Re: But the law itself glorifies terrorism...from the Gub'mint!
  otoh, we have a prez that terrorizes the citizenry with tweets.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
DONT MAKE ME LAUGH ( will i get arrested), 23 Mar 2018 @ 7:14am

these evil people need to be executed next
lol /s
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Anonymous Coward, 23 Mar 2018 @ 7:24am
  
  Re: these evil people need to be executed next
  you are under arrest!
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Ninja (profile), 23 Mar 2018 @ 7:32am

Terrorists have won. Even if they don't build their own califate or whatever you call it, they have succeeded into eroding the rights and the freedom we once held dear. Dark times.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Anonymous Coward, 23 Mar 2018 @ 7:42am
  
  Re:
  No, the terrorists did not win... the politicians did!
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - Anonymous Coward, 23 Mar 2018 @ 7:49am
    
    Re: Re:
    What's the diff?
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
    - Anonymous Coward, 23 Mar 2018 @ 8:16am
      
      Re: Re: Re:
      lol, not a bad point ha ha!
      
      The difference is the label being applied. We humans like labels because it justifies our immediate reactions no matter how wrong that label is.
      [ link to this | view in chronology ]
      - David, 23 Mar 2018 @ 10:10am
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re:
        The difference is that people deserve their politicians while the terrorists are a present.
        [ link to this | view in chronology ]
        
        Anonymous Coward, 23 Mar 2018 @ 11:20am
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
        Hahahaha - you mean I do not get the terrorists I deserve?
        [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 23 Mar 2018 @ 7:51am

I do not see anything in their law that addresses sarcasm.

Can the deterioration of society be tracked as a function of sarcasm usage in by the general public?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Anonymous Coward, 23 Mar 2018 @ 8:19am
  
  Re:
  Nail on the head!
  
  Look at the people arrested for making jokes in the presence of law enforcement or the TSA in America alone.
  
  the more you have to face government agency as subservient instead of as the citizen authorizing their existence the worse it gets.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - Wendy Cockcroft, 26 Mar 2018 @ 6:01am
    
    Re: Re:
    Finally a sensible comment on the subject. We the people confirm the authority of the government via the democratic process. It's not enough to vote for the candidate you hope will effect the change you want, you need to take part in campaigns on the issues you're interested in. People power works, you've just got to keep the pressure on.
    
    For many of us, it's too much bother but I don't think giving up and resigning ourselves to a crap status quo is the answer.
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
    - Anonymous Coward, 26 Mar 2018 @ 9:15am
      
      Re: Re: Re:
      In theory, yes. However, "the vote" has been manipulated beyond recognition and certainly is not what many refer to as a democratic process, it's more like an auction.
      
      In addition, I do not recall being afforded a vote upon whether the big banks and wallstreet types should screw the world economy for their own benefit. I did not get to vote upon whether the perpetrators should be prosecuted.
      
      I hear that everyone is lazy and this explains the shit situation of today but this simply does not add up. There were plenty of people out in the streets expressing their desires for less murdering of children. Plenty of folk doing lots of stuff is very encouraging until they get tossed in jail.
      [ link to this | view in chronology ]
This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it

Anonymous Coward, 23 Mar 2018 @ 8:00am

RED ALERT! RECORD-BREAKING ZOMBIE! "BAlbrecht or Bruce A."
SEVEN AND HALF YEAR GAP! LAST SEEN IN 2010!

https://www.techdirt.com/user/balbrecht

HA, HA! -- OH, NO! NO ASTRO-TURFING ON THIS WEIRD SITE!

In another topic, but ANY HUMANS HERE NEED WARNED.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it

Anonymous Coward, 23 Mar 2018 @ 8:00am

Pro-tips for Techdirt Zombie Killers (TM):
#1: This gets latest, starting on ALL over a million comments:

https://www.techdirt.com/comments.php?start=0

#2: The lite mode lets see all comments, though apparently loses useful gravatar so can't tell among the many ACs, ALSO, sets a cookie so you're stuck in that mode:

https://www.techdirt.com/?_format=lite

#3 Most important: don't take this site seriously! It's just entertainment, like pro-wrestling.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 23 Mar 2018 @ 8:01am

the inevitable result of our own complacency
"It's gotten so bad Amnesty International -- an entity that usually spends its time decrying the acts of dictators and brutal authoritarians -- has felt compelled to speak up about Spain's terrible speech laws."

Amnesty International is a huge hypocrite. They have no problem about Germany jailing people for years for making stupid Nazi salutes, or for Austria handing down long prison sentences for history professors who disagree with the official version of WWII history.

Amnesty International fully supported the arrests and lengthy imprisonments of people like David Irving, Ernst Zundel, Robert Faurisson, and many more ant-PC dissidents whose only crime was writing things that offended people.

Of course many of you believe that anyone who thinks kooky things like the Holocaust being untrue are haters, bigots, and nazis who deserves to be silenced by whatever means necessary. The problem is that when we start locking up "very bad" people for their thoughts, it grows to include "less bad" people, and then we eventually will start locking up many good people for their speech.

It's a slow insidious process, and it's ironic that we're only just now starting to demand free speech, a universal ideal whose repression in 1st world countries has been slowly growing and expanding and becoming entrenched for many years, when suddenly we wake up and realize that it's not just "them" who are going to jail for their speech -- but "us."
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Anonymous Coward, 23 Mar 2018 @ 8:42am
  
  Re: the inevitable result of our own complacency
  People are simply afraid of liberty. The cost drives them mad with fear and they will soon clamor for protection even if they lose liberty for it!
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - Anonymous Coward, 23 Mar 2018 @ 8:49am
    
    Re: Re: the inevitable result of our own complacency
    bullshit
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
    - Anonymous Coward, 23 Mar 2018 @ 9:12am
      
      Re: Re: Re: the inevitable result of our own complacency
      Lets put you to the test?
      
      Should citizens have the right to publish classified information or state secrets to the press?
      Should citizens have the right call other citizens any name they want?
      Should citizens have the right to carry weapons to use as they see fit?
      Would you STOP a police officer from arresting someone you KNOW to be innocent but all KNOW will be unfairly prosecuted?
      
      Tell us? How far will YOU go to secure liberty?
      [ link to this | view in chronology ]
      - Anonymous Coward, 23 Mar 2018 @ 10:37am
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re: the inevitable result of our own complacency
        No matter how far I go you'll scream about how it isn't enough, it's too much, or I'm not doing it the way that fits your bloody nebulous criteria.
        
        Fuck me, you are boring.
        [ link to this | view in chronology ]
        
        Anonymous Coward, 23 Mar 2018 @ 11:38am
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: the inevitable result of our own complacency
        Oh... touched a nerve did I?
        
        Okay, go ahead and be bored, but when you start getting fucked up by the problems that arise from all of this, don't get bitchy about it, though we all know you will be one of the first crybabies whining!
        [ link to this | view in chronology ]
        
        Anonymous Coward, 23 Mar 2018 @ 6:45pm
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: the inevitable result of our own complacency
        You scream about it any and every time you post.
        
        You complain about crybabies, but every time an article comes up you're running ahead of the race crowing about the fact that are crybabies. Which nobody ever denied, but keep strutting around like you've discovered penicillin or something.
        [ link to this | view in chronology ]
      - Anonymous Coward, 23 Mar 2018 @ 11:31am
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re: the inevitable result of our own complacency
        Not sure how that relates to the prior post with the claim "People are simply afraid of liberty."
        
        Perhaps I underestimated the scope of your "liberty" usage.
        
        It is generally accepted that one is not allowed (or has been given the liberty) to do anything that infringes upon the rights of others. Your rights end where mine begin is a common phrase that many do not understand or think is correct.
        
        Are you one of those sovCit types?
        [ link to this | view in chronology ]
        
        Anonymous Coward, 23 Mar 2018 @ 11:47am
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: the inevitable result of our own complacency
        No, I am independent, I am closer to the founder type.
        
        and I agree with your statement that liberty ends when another's rights are infringed.
        
        The problem is that most people think that their fears should trump my liberty. Hence the "fear of liberty" comment.
        
        "If Tyranny and Oppression come to this land, it will be in the guise of fighting a foreign enemy."
        
        ~James Madison
        
        This quote echoes what I say. It is the fear of the cowards of every nation that politicians will latch onto to justify their power grabs. Just like another post in this thread that said the politicians themselves were terrorists for using terror to goad people to agree with their politics.
        
        I can assure you that the vast majority of people would run instead of stand and fight if a shooter showed up. If you don't believe it, just watch all of the video of people running, running, and still running away from danger rather than risking their lives to stop it. Not only that, their fear of collateral damage from people willing to stand and fight often time lead to laws the turn people into eternal victims.
        
        Politicians LOVE victims. They can be used to justify anything, and the more of them you have the easier it is to enact tyranical laws... just like DHS/TSA after 9/11.
        
        ---Not sure how that relates to the prior post with the claim "People are simply afraid of liberty."---
        
        Now you know how it relates!
        [ link to this | view in chronology ]
        
        Anonymous Coward, 23 Mar 2018 @ 2:34pm
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: the inevitable result of our own complacency
        "The problem is that most people think that their fears should trump my liberty. Hence the "fear of liberty" comment."
        
        Would that "liberty" to which you refer include things like not making a cake, renting only to whites and being tough on crime ... that sort of thing?
        [ link to this | view in chronology ]
        
        Anonymous Coward, 24 Mar 2018 @ 6:36pm
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: the inevitable result of our own complacency
        Be fucking real .
        Liberty is the right for your little piss filled life to be taken by someone else because your too scared to defend it AND your not allowed to have your fear impend my right to legally carry a firearm to defend myself while you cower in a corner crying for someone else to protect you .
        [ link to this | view in chronology ]
        
        Anonymous Coward, 25 Mar 2018 @ 6:48am
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: the inevitable result of our own complacency
        I am rather certain that you are not clairvoyant, and yet it appears you think you are. Perhaps you need professional help? Have you ever thought that you were Ethel Mermann?
        [ link to this | view in chronology ]
        
        Anonymous Coward, 25 Mar 2018 @ 11:30am
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: the inevitable result of our own complacency
        Also ... did you just threaten me?
        [ link to this | view in chronology ]
        
        Anonymous Coward, 25 Mar 2018 @ 11:32am
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: the inevitable result of our own complacency
        Ever heard of the Hatfield–McCoy feud? That is where everybody being responsible for their own defense all too often leads.
        [ link to this | view in chronology ]
        
        Anonymous Coward, 26 Mar 2018 @ 9:21am
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: the inevitable result of our own complacency
        Like a kindergarten free for all because they all want the same toy.
        [ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Hugo S Cunningham (profile), 23 Mar 2018 @ 10:03am
  
  Re: the inevitable result of our own complacency
  Holocaust deniers are the scum of the Earth.
  
  Nevertheless, outside of Israel, in no country are they more isolated and powerless than in the USA, where Holocaust denial is legal. "Sunlight is the best disinfectant."
  
  Antisemites in Europe are not shamed into reexamining their views by bans on Holocaust denial. Instead, they choose to believe that such bans merely reflect political muscle, and seek to employ their own political muscle to ban speech they don't like.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
PlagueSD (profile), 23 Mar 2018 @ 9:52am

Looks like Spain is finally realizing how profitable it is running a prison system. Now they need an easy way to overfill their prisons...Just like the US.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Anonymous Coward, 26 Mar 2018 @ 9:24am
  
  Re:
  These prison privateers lack foresight in that their business model is not scalable nor is it sustainable at high levels of "participation". What will these brainiacs do when everyone is in jail - who will pay the taxes required to sustain the business?
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 23 Mar 2018 @ 2:19pm

The problems with not cleaning house
I personally blame the behavior post Spanish Civil War and dictatorship. They were never held responsible for their crimes so they try to do it again whenever they can get away with it. Not cleaning house emboldened them to do this shit. Reminds me of the criminalization of ACAB and going after a woman with a "All Cats Are Beautiful" shirt. The pigs there really proved the point of "All Cops Are Bastards" by not just enforcing laws criminalizing it but jumping the gun at anything that looks like it.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 24 Mar 2018 @ 3:06am

Legally Spain MUST immediately be suspended by the European Parliament pending a MAXIMUM 3month investigation on whether Spain is to be permanently removed.

But the EU is sitting on it's ass ignoring one of it's own most primary rules, that joined states must BE and STAY a democracy. WHich spain isn't, because criticizing the government is illegal.

And criticism is defined now as "not voting for them"
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Anonymous Coward, 24 Mar 2018 @ 10:26am
  
  Re:
  Well, if that was the case, then the whole EU would fall apart.
  
  For starters, because it ain't that easy to remove a country from the EU.
  
  Also, every EU Member State has their own internal rules regarding speech. It's one of the things that isn't being harmonized by the EU (Remember why ACTA had to be a mixed treaty and not ratified only by the EU? Because it had provisions regarding criminal procedures that aren't in the scope of the EU).
  
  On the other hand, remember that Spain isn't the only one that does this in some degree, and I'm talking about countries like Germany or France.
  
  Many of other countries do have lese majeste provisions, and they apply them to varied degrees:
  
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/L%C3%A8se-majest%C3%A9
  
  Terrorism, hate speech and others are pretty common in the EU.
  
  And there is also the fact that removing Spain from the EU would have a big impact on EU economy. In fact, we still aren't out of the Brexit fallout (wait when the UK materializes it) and removing Spain forcefully might have worse effects.
  
  In the end, the brits wanted out of the EU, so they'll have to come to an agreement. If you remove a country forcefully, it's harder to hammer an agreement and to get back the debt with it.
  
  Only if it was a VERY obvious case of dictatorship (like a coup d'etat) you might have enough grounds to remove a country in a flashy way.
  
  While such actions are illegal, and that's why Spain will have to follow the ECHR ruling (give back the fine imposed), that doesn't mean it has to change their laws (the judiciary has no power to force the legislative to change a law, save in cases covered by the Constitution, like the Constitutional Court or maybe the EUCJ labelling that law as against EU Law).
  
  So, in the eyes of the law, Spain is a democratic country, as it has the proper institutions to keep a control of it (Constitutional Court, EUCJ, ECHR...) and follows their rulings (even if to the letter and using loopholes).
  
  That doesn't mean, of course, that Spain is a perfect country or whatever. It isn't. But no, the EU won't remove Spain from the EU.
  
  At best, as said above, you can expect an EUCJ ruling (and that's only if the case is brought to them).
  
  Still, what the ECHR has brought into the table is grounds for:
  - A national judge to bring the case to the EUCJ.
  - Grounds for the EUCJ to declare that article as contrary to the EU Law.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Cobarde anónimo, 24 Mar 2018 @ 5:40pm

Fixed that for you.

Amnesty International -- an entity that usually spends its time promoting régime-change war in Syria ....

Sad, but recently quite true.

As for Spain's lèse-self-importance laws, I've heard that only legislators with very low IQs and tiny penises vote for stuff like that.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
mik, 25 Mar 2018 @ 1:31am

Good old lese-majeste. Bureaucracies around the world are bringing this gem of monarchic detritus back in full force. It all started once law enforcement agencies were hailed as heroes instead of the public servants they are.
Now we have actual bureaucrats demanding they be treated like royalty and the politicians that the majority of brain dead dumbasses vote in because they are scared of practically everything go along with because they know power when they snort it
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Anonymous Coward, 25 Mar 2018 @ 6:50am
  
  Re:
  What are you scared of?
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - Anonymous Coward, 25 Mar 2018 @ 7:09am
    
    Re: Re:
    Why are you scared to allow me to defend myself .
    I'm not scared for you not to defend yourself .
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
    - Anonymous Coward, 25 Mar 2018 @ 11:40am
      
      Re: Re: Re:
      I suppose it depends upon what is considered to be defense. Some people think that attacking those you dislike is a good defense even when said dislike is not warranted but is simply some bigoted personality fault.
      
      In such situations, why should you be afforded what you consider to be a defense when others claim it is murder? Why do you think you are under attack when it is plainly clear to not be the case? What are they doing to you?
      
      Do you think you are Judge Dredd? If so why do you think this? Do you try to talk like Sylvester Stallone?
      [ link to this | view in chronology ]
      - Anonymous Coward, 26 Mar 2018 @ 6:55am
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re:
        Oh Please there you are putting your own fears into it .
        So your line thinking goes
        "I'm walking down the street and don't like that hat the person is wearing So I attack the hat and remove it "
        That is the WAY YOU THINK not me .
        So You are one who is afraid and lashing out before anyone else does anything to you .
        So you are operating on fear alone .
        So yes if I'm walking down the street wearing the funny hat you don't like and you attack me to remove it of course It's my right to defend against it .
        If on the other hand you kept your fear of my funny hat to yourself and just walked on by , I would have walked on by oblivious to your fears and hence nothing would have occurred .
        It's you who are minority report projecting .
        It's your acting out of irrational fear that motivates you while I only react to an actual threat .
        [ link to this | view in chronology ]
        
        Anonymous Coward, 26 Mar 2018 @ 9:31am
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
        Yeah, pretty much what I expected.
        
        I see your projection and wonder what you are afraid of, and why lashing out at others is considered a rational response.
        [ link to this | view in chronology ]
        
        Anonymous Coward, 26 Mar 2018 @ 9:57am
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
        Lashing out ?
        Please take your head out of your arse and join the real world , not the land of unicorns and fairy dust you live in
        Your world revolves around how you wish it were not how it is .
        I hope you are never attacked by a predator because clearly you are unprepared to defend yourself and rather believe that it won't , can't, ever happen to you till it does .
        Just because it's never happened to you doesn't mean that it doesn't happen .
        You must be like the politicians who don't believe in gay rights till they find out their child is gay , then they're all for it .
        Unfortunately by the time you get it it's usually too late .
        [ link to this | view in chronology ]
        
        Anonymous Coward, 26 Mar 2018 @ 10:48am
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
        It's good to see you have it all figured out, good luck on your adventures.
        [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Cohencidence, 25 Mar 2018 @ 8:10am

Is this related?

http://www.latimes.com/world/europe/la-fg-spain-sephardic-jews-20151001-story.html

Or is it cohencidence...or... Lashon hara!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]